search for: eth1

Lables: Gateway = 209.5.171.65 Netmask = 255.255.255.192 Eth0 = net = 209.5.171.66 Eth1 = loc = 192.168.0.1 There is no NAT clients, in essence loc is dmz. I can rename loc to dmz if that helps. Proxy/ARP is used for IP addresses 209.5.171.67-126 Problem: Using the Shorewall Action AllowFTP does not result in desired behavior when connecting from Internet to machines behind firewall...

...uld i do it? Here is my nat.sh script just in case someone wants it.. (comments r in spanish.. and not right) Thanks in advance, #!/bin/sh echo "AthoS LaN Generando iptables..." > /dev/tty12 #limpiamos las tablas de iptables iptables -F iptables -t nat -F iptables -t filter -F #eth1 sera la interfaz de internet iptables --table nat --append POSTROUTING --out-interface eth1 -j MASQUERADE #eth0 la interfaz de la red local iptables --append FORWARD --in-interface eth0 -j ACCEPT #activamos el forward echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward #reglas para enrutado de paketes.....

I am having an issue where eth1 is throwing some messages and stops responding. Restarting networking doesn't work and also just bringing down eth1 with 'ifdown' doesn't fix it. I have never seen anything like these messages: eth1: no IPv6 routers present r8169 0000:03:00.0: eth1: rtl_counters_cond == 1 (loop: 10...

I am trying to transport a dd image between to hosts over a cross linked gigabit connection. Both hosts have an eth1 configured to a non routable ip addr on a shared network. No other devices exist on this link. When transferring via sftp I received a stall warning. Checking the logs I see this: dmesg | grep eth e1000e 0000:00:19.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:1c:c0:f2:1f:bb e1000e 0000:00:19.0:...

...ssage at a HP DL360 Server. The kernel log says: ----------------------------------- /var/log/messages ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mar 19 15:45:06 server kernel: do_IRQ: 2.168 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Mar 19 15:45:17 server kernel: bnx2 0000:02:00.1: eth1: DEBUG: intr_sem[0] PCI_CMD[00100446] Mar 19 15:45:17 server kernel: bnx2 0000:02:00.1: eth1: DEBUG: PCI_PM[19002108] PCI_MISC_CFG[92000088] Mar 19 15:45:17 server kernel: bnx2 0000:02:00.1: eth1: DEBUG: EMAC_TX_STATUS[00000008] EMAC_RX_STATUS[00000006] Mar 19 15:45:17 server kernel: bnx2 0000:02:0...

Have you experienced this? What's going on when this occurs? What do I need to do to keep it from occurring? Please advise. Thanks. Dec 4 10:18:17 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:19 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Dec 4 10:18:21 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Down Dec 4 10:18:23 localhost kernel: e1000: eth1 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Dec 4 10:18:...

Hallo, I have running xen-4.2/linux-3.8 (compiled) on any hosts. - dell pe r720: drac, eth0-3:igb squeeze -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:ok - dell pe R620: drac=eth0, eth1-3:tg3 wheezy -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:fail So i running "xend start" (or "xenbridges start") on my patient (R620 with broadcom tg3) network will be lost: RTNETLINK answers: File exists Failed to bring up eth1. It seen to be a problem near scripts/network-bridge:do_...

Hi, I´m shaping traffic using htb on both interfaces, I noticed that shaping download traffic is workinggreat but shaping upload traffic is not working at all (no sent packets, no dropped, no overlimits)I have eth0 facing the backbone and eth1 facing the LAN. Thanks for your help.These are the commands I run:tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 10 r2q 5 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 3Mbit tc...

...raffic using HTB and mark packets within iptables using PREROUTING. But the filterrules seems to ignore the marks set with PREROUTING Only POSTROUTING marks are accepted. First my configuration I have a router connected to the internet via ADSL over interface ppp0. eth0 is a tunnel to ppp0 and eth1 serves the LAN. LAN is 192.168.57.0/24 on 10Mbit ppp0 is 80.126.16.44 on 320Kbit upstream and 2048Kbit downstream These are the kernel/programs involved: Kernel 2.4.20 (Suse 8.2) iproute version 2.4.7 iptables version 1.2.7a Underneath the HTB script and a snapshot of the iptables script. The...

...s stats reset. and iptraf shows that there is only 50% bandwith usage. What could be the problem ? root@gecon:/home/bernard# cat /etc/rc.d/rc.htb #!/bin/sh HIGHSPEED="19 " CLIENTS="01 05 07 11 12 13 15 18 63" SLOW="20 21 22" htb_start() { echo "tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 12" tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 12 echo "tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: tbf rate 230kbit latency 50ms burst 1540" tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: tbf rate 230kbit latency 50ms burst 1540 echo "tc class add dev eth1...

> First off, I assume you can ping your link-local address: > > ping6 -I eth1 fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a > > Second, you never mentioned how eth1 was assigned its IPv6 address. > Given that you've tried to embed an IPv4 address within an IPv6 address > (which is normally done with a 0:0:0:0:0: prefix), I'd guess you did it > manually. If so, with wh...

I shape my upstream cable link with HTB from a script. My voip traffic (from the 192.168.0.14 host) gets priority over everything else to the near-starvation of other classes; the rest of the traffic is split up based on some priority rules (qos, empty ack packets, etc). eth1 is the uplink I''ve been using HTB and fw marking for the job until recently, when I changed the queue structure around a bit, and moved to tc filters (no marking). None of my filters are working, in fact none are being applied, or respecting the ''parent'' attribute that...

...hing goes to the default class. The error might be obvious, but I cannot find it. I would really appreciate your help. this works, nothing goes to "1:9999": ############################################################################# /sbin/iptables -F -t mangle /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth1 root > /dev/null 2>&1 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 9999 /sbin/tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit ceil 100Mbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:9999 htb rate 128kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:4 htb r...

> Try > > ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 Thanks for the response. I tried. However, It did not resolve.... # ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 PING 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8(2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8) from fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a eth1: 56 data bytes On 2015/11/13 2:22, Paul Heinlein wrote: &gt...

Hi ! What is the best way to use eth1 of my dom0 in my domU ? i tried that in Dom0 but bridge don''t want comes up : ./xen-network-common.sh "network-bridge net-dev=eth1 bridge=brint virtnum=1" Thanks Michael _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http:...

...ARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A lay7PRE -m layer7 --l7proto smtp -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A lay7PRE -m layer7 --l7proto ssh -j MARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t mangle -A lay7PRE -m mark --mark 2 -j CONNMARK --save-mark ### POSTROUTING RULES ### iptables -t mangle -A ipp2pPOST -o eth1 -m mark --mark 3 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:30 iptables -t mangle -A lay7POST -o eth1 -m mark --mark 1 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:20 iptables -t mangle -A lay7POST -o eth1 -m mark --mark 2 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:10 ### ### iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j lay7PRE iptables -t mangle -A POSTR...

I wan to share internet to these 12 PCs. But my traffic control is not working. I''m using IP Masquerading to route internet to the LAN eth0 - LAN interface eth1 - Internet interface this is my firs htb script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root handle 1: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 25kbps ceil 48kbps #tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 4kbps ceil 48kbps...

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. My problem is: When I ping to P3.teql0 from P2 ("[P2]# ping 16.119.144.66"), the traffic can never go from P2.eth1, and all traffic only goes to P1.eth0. What P2.eth1 (16.119.144.33) did is broadcasting an ARP asking for the MAC address of 16.119.144.66, although I have specified the route to 16.119.144.64/30 is through gateway 16.119.144.32, as shown below. Similarly, when I use ttcp ("ttcp -t -s -n -T -v...

Dear all, Has anyone experienced this whilst running DRBD over eth1 between two CentOS 5.7 servers? eth1 is a private IP address, unroutable. eth0 is the public address. CentOS will reply sometimes once every 3 days or every 14mins~ saying "My public IP is on eth1" to arp requests when it's not, it's eth0. This freezes traffic and causes issues....

Currently using physdev on a bridge to try and isolate certain paths across and to the bridge. It all works except when trying to stop the flow in one direction on the FORWARD chain?? Can someone please help?? Below is the testing done so far. eth1 <---> BRIDGE <---> eth0 # Block (eth0 ---> eth1) - blocks both directions and not just one?? iptables -A FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -p icmp -j DROP # Block (eth0 <--- eth1) - blocks both directions and not just one?? iptables -A FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-out eth1...