Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "estotzer".
2018 Jan 09
1
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...ailto:hfinkel at anl.gov]
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2018 9:20 PM
To: Saito, Hideki <hideki.saito at intel.com>; aemerson at apple.com
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>; Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at arm.com>; Stotzer, Eric <estotzer at ti.com>; Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>; Kreitzer, David L <david.l.kreitzer at intel.com>; Nuzman, Dorit <dorit.nuzman at intel.com>; Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com>; James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com>; Sander De Smalen <Sander.DeSmalen at...
2018 Jan 06
2
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...apple.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 3:38 PM
To: Saito, Hideki <hideki.saito at intel.com>
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>; Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>; Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at arm.com>; Stotzer, Eric <estotzer at ti.com>; Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>; Kreitzer, David L <david.l.kreitzer at intel.com>; Nuzman, Dorit <dorit.nuzman at intel.com>; Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com>; James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com>; Sander De Smalen <Sander.DeSmalen at...
2018 Jan 07
0
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...t; Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 3:38 PM
> To: Saito, Hideki <hideki.saito at intel.com>
> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>; Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>; Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at arm.com>; Stotzer, Eric <estotzer at ti.com>; Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>; Kreitzer, David L <david.l.kreitzer at intel.com>; Nuzman, Dorit <dorit.nuzman at intel.com>; Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com>; James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com>; Sander De Smalen <Sander.DeSmalen at...
2018 Jul 23
2
[LoopVectorizer] Improving the performance of dot product reduction loop
On 07/23/2018 06:23 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> On 07/23/2018 05:22 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This code https://godbolt.org/g/tTyxpf is a dot product reduction
>> loop multipying sign extended 16-bit values to produce a 32-bit
>> accumulated result. The x86 backend is currently not able to optimize
>> it as well as gcc and icc.
2018 Jan 05
0
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
> On 5 Jan 2018, at 21:01, Saito, Hideki via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> I'm trying to refactor LoopVectorize such that it has better conformance to VPlan vision going forward
> (http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All VP*Recipe class definitions are now
> moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review
2018 Jul 24
2
[LoopVectorizer] Improving the performance of dot product reduction loop
On 07/24/2018 02:58 AM, Nema, Ashutosh wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 24, 2018 5:05 AM
> *To:* Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>; hideki.saito at intel.com;
> estotzer at ti.com; Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>; Adam
> Nemet <anemet at apple.com>; graham.hunter at arm.com; Michael Kuperstein
> <mkuper at google.com>; Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com>; Simon
> Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk>; Nema, As...
2018 Jan 05
2
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
All,
I'm trying to refactor LoopVectorize such that it has better conformance to VPlan vision going forward
(http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All VP*Recipe class definitions are now
moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review to move LoopVectorizationPlanner class out of
LoopVectorize.cpp (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420).
Next thing I'm working on is
2018 Jul 23
4
[LoopVectorizer] Improving the performance of dot product reduction loop
~Craig
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 4:24 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On 07/23/2018 05:22 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> This code https://godbolt.org/g/tTyxpf is a dot product reduction loop
> multipying sign extended 16-bit values to produce a 32-bit accumulated
> result. The x86 backend is currently not able to optimize it as well as gcc
2018 Jul 24
4
[LoopVectorizer] Improving the performance of dot product reduction loop
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:10 AM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On 07/23/2018 06:37 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>
>
> ~Craig
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 4:24 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 07/23/2018 05:22 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This code https://godbolt.org/g/tTyxpf