search for: estabilishment

Greetings, We are currently experiencing logon problems with a trusted domain user(s). Example: We have DomainA and DomainB DomainA and DomainB both have workstations joined on their respective domain. DomainA and DomainB both have trust relationships. DomainA trusts DomainB and vise versa. DomainA is where being served by a Samba PDC, while DomainB has a PDC using Windows NT 4.0 Server When

At the moment I have 2 network connected in a VPN and I'm planning to extend this. Actual status: Network A has a public IP Network B is behind a provider-scale NAT. Actually I'm using openvpn with a single UDP connection from B to A, and hosts inside Network A can communicate with B. I tried with tinc, and I saw tinc has to go TCP-Only for accomplish this. This is because Tinc

Hello, 1) Thanks - shorewall save me a lot of time! 2) I try - exactly: I must :-) - configure a VPN server behind 2 NATs. My situation: RoadWarior - INet - ISP Router (NAT+PortForwarding) - Inetranal Router (running Shorewal, NAT+PortForwarding) - Inetranl VPN Server If RoadWariror try to connect Internal VPN Server then connection failed with "GRE: Bad check chcksum from pppd"

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164 Bug ID: 1164 Summary: FTP NAT fails in a specific scenario after upgrade to kernel 4.7+ Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi all !!! I have a firewall bridge (not router) with two nics that filter p2p with ipp2p. All works fine but now I need to add a third nic to route all p2p traffic through this nic. It is that possible with a bridge ? Later (with other server) connect to this nic I do loading balancing with two adsl lines to route all p2p traffic. Any hint ? Any howto ? Thanks in advance. roberto --

Hello! passwd, shadow and group looks as follows in nsswitch.conf: passwd: files winbind shadow: files group: files group What really confuses me is that when my AD server is up and running, root or any local user logs in with no problem. And even when AD server is down, after trying a zillion times, root and other local users login, and then if I log them out and try again a few minutes

Hello everyone, this is my first post, so please be kind :) I've a working Samba AD DC 4.7.6 installed on Ubuntu 18.04 I can join Windows Machine, manage everything with RSAT. Yesterday I tried to estabilish a Domain Trust between my Samba Domain and a Windows 2008 domain, using "Active Directory Domains and Trusts". The Win2008 AD is one-way on outgoing trust, and my Samba is

Hi all, running beta 5 doesn't allow ssl connections: SASL authentication failed Same config runs well with beta3. I tried as well latest CVS, but this gives me the same error. Verbose debug output: dovecot: 2006-04-09 17:17:51 Info: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=IMAP secured lip=192.168.200.1 rip=192.168.200.202 dovecot: 2006-04-09 17:17:51 Info:

Hi all I am in this strange situation: we had ser configured to relay calls to numbers to asterisk extensions and all used to work nicely, with both ser and asterisk running on the same machine with public ip (ser on port 5060 and * on 5061). We had to move temporarily our server to another provider which put our server on a dmz, so that now we have our server with private ip but reachable from

We have ISDN PCI Adapter from Billion(using mISDN). When we connect it to the PSTN the incoming calls are OK. When we try to make a call we can't do that because the ISDN port is Down: CLI> misdn show port 1 BEGIN STACK_LIST: * Stack Addr: 40400001 Port 1 Type TE Prot. PMP L2Link DOWN L1Link:DOWN Idx: 0

Hello, i need help because my samba server is not working. I have a Samba TNG server which SUCCEEDS in authenticating all users stored in a LDAP Directory. They (admins before me) installed in a RH7.3 Box the rpms of Samba HEAD 2.2.3a which *sholud* make available some shares (e.g. users' home) while authenticating against the TNG. The previous version of Samba HEAD did work but since its

Hi. I'm trying to estabilish a trust between Win2k configured in mixed mode with SAMBA 3 server. I followed instructions from SAMBA HOWTO, however the trust is not working - I don't have any clue why is it not working - I didn't find any usefull message in SAMBA logs - I will continue debugging today evening. I want to achive that users from SMBDC domain can login into computers

3.0.21c on RHEL3. I use smbclient to transfer files from Samba to WIN PCs, name resolution is through bcast on local LAN. The network is not managed by me, all PC's are connected through switches (no routers). Sometimes ago network admins started decreasing the MAC addr table timeout in the switches setting it to 300 secs, this increased dramatically the chances a MAC is not in the switch

Hi all, Description: As most (if not all) of us known already Samba allows people to execute a program before (exec) and after (postexec) a user connect to a share. In our network due to certain requirement we have to find some way to run a program when the user login to NT domain, then run another program when he log out. A natural solution is to setup a Samba server and change the NT login

Hello! I've configured samba with winbind and pam_winbind module to authenticate users that connect to my linux box against MS AD. Works like a charm. If a user exists both in AD and locally, login should assume local users. Again, it works pretty well (It seems at least with my current config). If my AD server goes down for any reason, local users should be able to login. For example, root

...the network until a certain point, when in some ack the window size of the connection begins to shrink until it reaches 0! This is a window frozen problem, and afterwards all sorts of problems happen, until the workstation sends a RST to the server, which is immediately accomplished leading to the estabilishment of a new NBT session with the workstation. The problem is locking-independent, as the trace done with the sniffer has already shown. Conservative options like "use strict locking" make no difference. Someone has a clue about the shrinking of the window size only in the *second time* t...

Hi, First, never compare a linux box with a cheap and dumb broadband router. I''m not sure if i understand very well your scenario but I asume is like this: 192.168.0.1--------- -----------| ipsec | | --------- 128.X.X.X --------- 192.168.0.254 | ISP ----------| linux |------------------| --------- | ---------

hi all, I have a little question about meetme in Asterisk. One of my client ask me that all call can, if is necessary, become conference for 3-4 user during conversation. I think that are 2 way for make this: 1- all call (instead if the users are only 2) are conference 2- using n-way call (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+n-way+call+HOWTO) I decide to implement the first way because

Hello, I am running into this error: /Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded (mail_max_userip_connections=10)/ The suggested solution in hundreds of support requests on this mailing list and throughout the internet is to increase the number of maximum userip connections. But this is not curing the problem, it is just postponing it to the moment when the new limit is reached. When i

IF you are not stuck to IPSec, you might want to take a look at OpenVPN (www.openvpn.org). I found OpenVPN easier to install than FreeSWAN (an IPSEC VPN) and have setup an OpenVPN solution between my German office and our mainoffice in a matter of hours. Thom van der Boon E-Mail: Thom.van.der.Boon at vdb.nl ===== Thom.H. van der Boon b.v. Havens 563 Jan Evertsenweg 2-4 NL-3115 JA Schiedam