search for: estabilish

Greetings, We are currently experiencing logon problems with a trusted domain user(s). Example: We have DomainA and DomainB DomainA and DomainB both have workstations joined on their respective domain. DomainA and DomainB both have trust relationships. DomainA trusts DomainB and vise versa. DomainA is where being served by a Samba PDC, while DomainB has a PDC using Windows NT 4.0 Server When

...TCP-Only for accomplish this. This is because Tinc can't reutilize incoming UDP connections to reply back - has to set up an outgoing udp connection defined in config (thing that in a NAT-ed environment isn't possible) I saw in git repository that tinc fallbacks to TCP-Only if it can't estabilish a double-UDP connection, that is fine. But shouldn't tinc get the ability to use an inbound tcp connection to answer back the remote host? (maybe setting incoming ip and leaving port blank or something) -- Keiji Costantini

...(NAT+PortForwarding) - Inetranal Router (running Shorewal, NAT+PortForwarding) - Inetranl VPN Server If RoadWariror try to connect Internal VPN Server then connection failed with "GRE: Bad check chcksum from pppd" message. If I try connect to this VPN server from LAN then connection is estabilished well. I have rules DNAT net loc:10.1.4.20 tcp 1723 DNAT net loc:10.1.4.20 gre Can be problem with "double NAT"? Can you help please? Zbynek Cvach

...: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: NAT Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org Reporter: br.larini at gmail.com After upgrading from kernel 4.6.5-300.fc24.x86_64 to 4.10.10-100.fc24.x86_64 I can't estabilish FTP connections that are originated in my LAN to an FTP server, also located in the LAN. The distro is Fedora 24 and the kernel are from official repositories. - My firewall server DNATs FTP connections on port 21 to a server inside the LAN listening on port 2121. - External clients can connect t...

Hi all !!! I have a firewall bridge (not router) with two nics that filter p2p with ipp2p. All works fine but now I need to add a third nic to route all p2p traffic through this nic. It is that possible with a bridge ? Later (with other server) connect to this nic I do loading balancing with two adsl lines to route all p2p traffic. Any hint ? Any howto ? Thanks in advance. roberto --

...dea is that when the AD server is > down and I try to login with root for eg. over and over many times, > after a while it goes (looks like pam config order is right), but a few > minutes later it won't again, which made me thought that perhaps winbind > or pam_winbind are trying to estabilish a connection with AD and somehow > because of that the whole process slows down so much that even local > login times out. > > Samba is configured to catch UID's, GID's from AD using SFU and ad idmap > backend. Only users that are members of a specified AD group are able to &...

Hello everyone, this is my first post, so please be kind :) I've a working Samba AD DC 4.7.6 installed on Ubuntu 18.04 I can join Windows Machine, manage everything with RSAT. Yesterday I tried to estabilish a Domain Trust between my Samba Domain and a Windows 2008 domain, using "Active Directory Domains and Trusts". The Win2008 AD is one-way on outgoing trust, and my Samba is one-way on the incoming side, both as "External" trust After the wizard, everything works as intended, Sam...

...t): client out: CONT 1 dovecot: 2006-04-09 17:17:51 Info: auth(default): client in: CONT<hidden> dovecot: 2006-04-09 17:18:51 Info: imap-login: Disconnected: Inactivity: method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.200.202, lip=192.168.200.1, TLS If I logged in on the dovecot server itself, the connection is estabilished. I guess it's only a change in the config, but which? Elimar -- Do you smell something burning or ist it me?

...* on 5061). We had to move temporarily our server to another provider which put our server on a dmz, so that now we have our server with private ip but reachable from the outside via port forwarding on a public ip. Now every communication with asterisk is mute, calls are relayed by ser, connections estabilished, but no voice either with sip or with demo-echotest (* log says he is playing echotest but I can't hear anything!). I thought this was a dmz firewall + rtp problem but ports in rtp.conf are open with forwarding (udp). This is current network situation: myserver: private ip 10.0.0.229, ser r...

...1 stack->chan: 0 Chan 2 InUse:0 When we try to up manually we have the following: misdn port up 1 NO BC FOR STACK: port:1 TE_FRM_HANDLER: Returning 0 on prim:20382 port:1 Unhandled Message: prim 20382 len 0 from addr 41400001, dinfo 2 on port: 1 How can estabilish the ISDN port to Up ?

...word.c:domain_client_validate(1554) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- - From the log it seems that some information should be wrote to the HEAD server in order to estabilish the PDC credentials - Why it says 'Error' on a SUCCESS assertion ? - Can someone provide me with a LDAP trust relationship ? Stated that TNG works fine as a PDC i desume that trust relationship work fine. - Is it possible that an upgrade would make it ? The openldap server is OpenLDAP 2.0....

Hi. I'm trying to estabilish a trust between Win2k configured in mixed mode with SAMBA 3 server. I followed instructions from SAMBA HOWTO, however the trust is not working - I don't have any clue why is it not working - I didn't find any usefull message in SAMBA logs - I will continue debugging today evening. I want...

...increased dramatically the chances a MAC is not in the switch MAC table, this had some side-effects: - you lose first ping packest (or first 2) when pinging an host whose MAC addr is not in the switch MAC table - smbclient will fail to transfer files since it will immediately exit after failing to estabilish a connection - other apps (ie: telnet) will somehow wait a bit and manage to make the connection at the 1st attempt. So, is there a way to have smbclient wait a bit longer before giving up? I'd like to avoid having to do pings before calling smbclient or calling smbclient multiple times. Than...

...connection will be maintained throughout the user session. The user will never access \\XXX\yyy since no data stored there. When user logoff, the share disconnects and another program runs. In our smb.conf, we have the following lines: deadtime = 0 keepalive = 0 In this way, an estabilished connection won't be disconnected unless the user logoff the domain. This is exactly what we want since we only want to trigger the program at the moment that the user login/logoff. This setup has been running fine, until we extend it to whole the campus which contains 26,000 users. My Samb...

...came up with this idea is that when the AD server is down and I try to login with root for eg. over and over many times, after a while it goes (looks like pam config order is right), but a few minutes later it won't again, which made me thought that perhaps winbind or pam_winbind are trying to estabilish a connection with AD and somehow because of that the whole process slows down so much that even local login times out. Samba is configured to catch UID's, GID's from AD using SFU and ad idmap backend. Only users that are members of a specified AD group are able to login. The purpose of the...

...the network until a certain point, when in some ack the window size of the connection begins to shrink until it reaches 0! This is a window frozen problem, and afterwards all sorts of problems happen, until the workstation sends a RST to the server, which is immediately accomplished leading to the estabilishment of a new NBT session with the workstation. The problem is locking-independent, as the trace done with the sniffer has already shown. Conservative options like "use strict locking" make no difference. Someone has a clue about the shrinking of the window size only in the *second tim...

...e routing has taken place, so your private address is altered. This should do the trick. If you want to forward EVERYTHING to a host, the linux router cannot use the internet itself (acts as a stupid broadband router). This means, the routing works great, but the linux box itself can''t estabilish any connection, since packets destinated to it is forwarded to a lan host. And this is not what we want. Success, Iosif Peterfi, S.C. Forte Systems SRL http://wwww.fortesys.ro/ -----Original Message----- From: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl] On Behalf Of John...

hi all, I have a little question about meetme in Asterisk. One of my client ask me that all call can, if is necessary, become conference for 3-4 user during conversation. I think that are 2 way for make this: 1- all call (instead if the users are only 2) are conference 2- using n-way call (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+n-way+call+HOWTO) I decide to implement the first way because

Hello, I am running into this error: /Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded (mail_max_userip_connections=10)/ The suggested solution in hundreds of support requests on this mailing list and throughout the internet is to increase the number of maximum userip connections. But this is not curing the problem, it is just postponing it to the moment when the new limit is reached. When i

IF you are not stuck to IPSec, you might want to take a look at OpenVPN (www.openvpn.org). I found OpenVPN easier to install than FreeSWAN (an IPSEC VPN) and have setup an OpenVPN solution between my German office and our mainoffice in a matter of hours. Thom van der Boon E-Mail: Thom.van.der.Boon at vdb.nl ===== Thom.H. van der Boon b.v. Havens 563 Jan Evertsenweg 2-4 NL-3115 JA Schiedam