search for: essentiali

Hi, I' m experiencing many problems with oplocks break failure and Error: no route to host.essentialy onto \profiles dir and \netlogon dir. So My clients cannot update many files on the SAMBA/PDC and cannot read the NTconfig.pol file to update their policies. I have many PC that are old computers with Win2k and have an Antivirus and are slower machines ... This problem less occurs on newer

Hi all, I've been battling this for weeks. I have one samba server joined to our windows 2k3 domain that is happily using Active Directory for authenication via Winbind and kerberos. Ok great, but now I want to have two Samba boxs on the domain with consistant uid/rid mapping between. My question essentialy is can two samba servers use share a common uid/rid idmap when joined to a Windows

Hi! I'm running a Samba server at a University Department. I'd like to let my users change their "Samba password" through SWAT. So i've done a few hacks in swat.c Nothing much, essentialy i've adapted the interface and removed the other stuff. I don't have password sync between Samba and the system, because i want to let my users have separate passwords. Well...

I wrote a ruby script that parses a file into key-values like so: class Parser table = { } IO.foreach(''Localizable.strings'') { |line| if line =~ /^ \s* " (.*?) " \s* = \s* " (.*?) "/x table[ $1 ] = $2 end } end I want to store the key-values in different colums on my database so that when I enter a key, it gives me the corresponding value...how

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:58:30PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > If there is no hook registering to inode_init_security, theoretically > the LSM infrastructure should return -EOPNOTSUPP, which causes ocfs2 to > set si->enable to zero, and not execute the line that causes the kernel > to panic. > > The problem would arise if somehow the LSM infrastructure returns zero, >

Hello, we have a setup with a main samba server an an emergency server which synchronizes its data via rsync. Recently, I got the idea to run the emergency server under a different server name parallel to the main server so that users can easily recover deleted files etc. This lead to massive problems; the reason was that the clients randomly connected to the main or the backup server !

Hello I have a problem with POSIX ACLs. I have created a directory with these ACLs: > getfacl . # file: . # owner: testuser # group: tls user::rwx group::rwx group:ptls:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:group:tls:rwx default:group:ptls:r-x default:mask::rwx default:other::--- When I create a file in it, it inherits the containing directory's default

If you start Rterm/Rgui from the cmd (NT4.4) command line, the .Rhistory and .RData files are created/used in the current directory. I think, R should honor HOME or even the USERPROFILE variable. Regards Karl PS: is this the correct list for such reports or would it be better to use r-devel? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list --

If you start Rterm/Rgui from the cmd (NT4.4) command line, the .Rhistory and .RData files are created/used in the current directory. I think, R should honor HOME or even the USERPROFILE variable. Regards Karl PS: is this the correct list for such reports or would it be better to use r-devel? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list --

1. The function "KalmanLike" seems to change its inputs AND PREVIOUSLY MADE copies of the inputs. Consider the following (using R 2.1.0 patched under Windows XP): > Fig2.1 <- StructTS(x=Nile, type="level") > unlist(Fig2.1$model0[2:3]) a P 1120 286379470 > tst2 <- tst <- Fig2.1$model0 > tst23 <- tst[2:3] > tst23u <-

hi, i am new to xen. pls. guide me what is best os should be used with xen. also let me know if there is any baremetal xen hypervisor available as i read that i require one OS on which xen hypervisor will be installed. want to use it with 32 bit machine. thanks for your help. -- With Best Wishes Balwant _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

In porting some Common LISP code to R, I am trying to found out whether special care must be taken for the let* function. In Common LISP, "the let* block is like let except it is guaranteed to evaluate the initialization of its local variables in sequentially nested scopes, i.e. it provides an order to the binding and visibility of preceding variables.". I have included the recursive

Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl

I have a function in R that takes another function as argument: f <- function(g, ...) { #g is expected to be a function } I want to see if there is a way to implement "f" in C and calling it from R using ".C" interface. I know that I can use function pointers for my C implementation, but I imagine it's going to be nearly impossible to pass a function from R to C. Are

Hello, I am running SAMBA 2.0.7.0 on AIX 4.3.3.0 I have a 1 Tera Byte filesystem on AIX made available to NT and MAC. There is heavy IO activity on this filesystem and all of a sudden the NT's and MAC's can't read or write any file on this shared filesystem. Also AIX is running out of memory whenever this happens and files cannot be copied onto the said filesystem even at unix

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:56:35PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck