search for: espcially

...make sure that the results I''m getting are the ones that I want and not something else. I have set this up currently with MRTG, which works great. I also want to say that I have learned so much from using shorewall, the documentation and this list. Thanks everyone who asks questions and espcially Tom for such a wonderfully useful tool. Jamie

All, I''m trying to do some documentation on the models for our interfaces team. I espcially need them to be able to see the relationships belongs_to and validations. However, I must be stupid with rdoc because I can''t seem to get those two things in the generated documentation. Ideas?

...vectors of i1 to memory as being undefined. > > (I recognize that I probably don't want to be doing this in general and wouldn't expect it to necessarily be super efficient.  But this was unusual enough that it seemed worth checking about.) There are longstanding issues with CodeGen (espcially loads/stores) of i1 vectors. One of which is that we never actually decided what the memory representation should be... -Eli

I'm seeing some behavior that surprised me in writing an <8 x i1> vector to memory and reading it back. (Specifically, the surprise is that I didn't get the original value back!). This happens both with TOT and 2.9. This program illustrates the issue: define i32 @foo() { %c = alloca <8 x i1> store <8 x i1> <i1 true, i1 false, i1 false, i1 false, i1 false, i1

...name or a switch enabling the new/changed feature. Since the 4.18.9 ntlm_auth output has an oddly placed colon (:) in the string, as if some text was supposed to come before that, I'll assume this was an inadvertant omission and not a deliberate change to the output response of this program, espcially given that the other responses (full text): NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER: The specified account does not exist. (0xc0000064) NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD: When trying to update a password, this return status indicates that the value provided as the current password is not correct. (0xc000006a) are unchange...

Hi, My question is in refernece to the posting by Jeremy McNamara here.. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-October/022966.html He states that in order for "trunking" to work the type has to be peer.. When I set mine up I did so using type=friend just to make it simple.. So when I read the above posting I thought well maybe my "trunking" has not been

Hi! I'm new on the list, so please, be patient with me! I have a problem for wich I can't find the answer in the FAQ. Until recently I was running a 16 PC-s network with SCO OpenServer 5.0.4 and Samba 1.9.16p11 on the server and mixed clients (Win 3.11 to Win 95 OSR2). The users on the network have access to a PUBLIC directory on they own user directories on the server without

Hi, Im using dovecote as my IMAP interface. However i do have a lot of imap instances. its only 7 user using the system as i get this. please advice. 1230 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1309 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1387 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1388 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1389 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1390 ? S 0:00 imap-login 1391 ? S

I have scripts that runs ntlm_auth. Before upgrading my DC to 4.18.9 I would get text string output from the ntlm_auth command. For example: STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD STATUS_OK My script(s) look for these strings. Now with the new Samba, the first two strings are output as usual in the case of non-existant user and invalid password, respectively, but if the user/pw is OK it

Dear all I was writing some code that needed functions from packages 'MASS' and 'CircStats', and I received a warning saying that the function 'eqscplot' in one of the packages was masked by another 'eqscplot' from the other package (in fact 'eqscplot' from 'CircStats' seems a short version of 'eqscplot' from 'MASS'). This masking of

Declan Kelly <flac-dev at groov.ie> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:50:20AM -0800, giles at thaumas.net wrote: >> I wouldn't worry about it though. It's unfortunate the dbPowerAmp >> developers want to take advantage of the subset of customer who don't >> understand what 'lossless' means. > > I read some of the articles on

I will be deploying Dovecot on OS X shortly. I am looking for clarification on the limits imposed by OS X and sysctl [kern.maxproc]. I understand that it is defaulting to 532, but can be raised to 2500. I believe the OS uses around 100 or so, plus I will have other processes and shells at times. Does Dovecot use one process per user logged in? I find Apple Mail uses about 4 IMAP

...g the new/changed feature. > > Since the 4.18.9 ntlm_auth output has an oddly placed colon (:) in > the string, as if some text was supposed to come before that, I'll > assume this was an inadvertant omission and not a deliberate change > to the output response of this program, espcially given that the > other responses (full text): > > NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER: The specified account does not exist. > (0xc0000064) NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD: When trying to update a > password, this return status indicates that the value provided as the > current password is not corre...

Does anyone know how to make Rails aware of controllers that might exist in directories that exist deeper than one level under the app/controllers directory? I initially figured just adding additional scope information might do the trik (i.e. Tabs::Admin::OneController or Admin::Tabs::OneController), but that does not seem to work. I''m guessing that I can just manually add these

Hi Tim, Thanks for the commentary, you bring a good point to light: I think the asynchronous nature of AJAX needs to be looked at more carefully in our UI assumptions. The key difference between AJAX auto-complete and any other browser/OS autocomplete is that we can''t guarantee having the results ready by the time the user wants to hit TAB. In the old days we used to have everything

...process size in megabytes. If you don't use # login_process_per_connection you might need to grow this. #login_process_size = 16 # Should each login be processed in it's own process (yes), or should one # login process be allowed to process multiple connections (no)? Yes is more # secure, espcially with SSL/TLS enabled. No is faster since there's no need # to create processes all the time. #login_process_per_connection = yes # Number of login processes to create. If login_process_per_user is # yes, this is the number of extra processes waiting for users to log in. #login_processes_count...

...process size in megabytes. If you don't use # login_process_per_connection you might need to grow this. #login_process_size = 16 # Should each login be processed in it's own process (yes), or should one # login process be allowed to process multiple connections (no)? Yes is more # secure, espcially with SSL/TLS enabled. No is faster since there's no need # to create processes all the time. #login_process_per_connection = yes # Number of login processes to create. If login_process_per_user is # yes, this is the number of extra processes waiting for users to log in. #login_processes_count...

...process size in megabytes. If you don't use # login_process_per_connection you might need to grow this. #login_process_size = 16 # Should each login be processed in it's own process (yes), or should one # login process be allowed to process multiple connections (no)? Yes is more # secure, espcially with SSL/TLS enabled. No is faster since there's no need # to create processes all the time. #login_process_per_connection = yes # Number of login processes to create. If login_process_per_user is # yes, this is the number of extra processes waiting for users to log in. #login_processes_count...

...process size in megabytes. If you don't use # login_process_per_connection you might need to grow this. #login_process_size = 16 # Should each login be processed in it's own process (yes), or should one # login process be allowed to process multiple connections (no)? Yes is more # secure, espcially with SSL/TLS enabled. No is faster since there's no need # to create processes all the time. #login_process_per_connection = yes # Number of login processes to create. If login_process_per_user is # yes, this is the number of extra processes waiting for users to log in. #login_processes_count...

.... process size in megabytes. If you don't use # login_process_per_connection you might need to grow this. login_process_size = 32 # Should each login be processed in it's own process (yes), or should one # login process be allowed to process multiple connections (no)? Yes is more # secure, espcially with SSL/TLS enabled. No is faster since there's no need # to create processes all the time. login_process_per_connection = yes # Number of login processes to create. If login_process_per_user is # yes, this is the number of extra processes waiting for users to log in. login_processes_count =...