search for: esmtps

armando at mail.bpa.cu The original message was received at Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:46 -0500 from faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <armando at mail.bpa.cu> (reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 554 5.4.6 Too many hops 27 (25 max): from <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk>

This morning I discovered this in the logwatch report for our external MX backup host. STARTTLS: write error=syscall error (-1), errno=32, get_error=error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0), retry=99, ssl_err=5: 206 Time(s) I also see many entries similar to this: 8: fl=0x802, mode=140777: SOCK inet04.mississauga.harte-lyne.ca/34091->(Transport endpoint is not connected): 1 Time(s)

************* eManager Notification ************** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Destination mailbox(es): "samba@samba.org" ******************* End of message ******************* -------------- next part -------------- Received: from 208.8.92.167 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:55:27 -0400 Received: from

Ran into a weird problem, and this seemed a good forum to toss it out into -- if I've gaffed, please let me know. Just upgraded my RH5.0 box to RH5.2. Went well, worked nearly seamlessly. When running 5.0, though, I'd installed the opie-fied ftpd that comes with the most recent opie package (ftp://ftp.inner.net/pub/opie/opie-2.32.tar.gz) and had it work without a hitch. I'd also

Ever since xen-unstable cset 14308 ("pci back: Fix registration of of filters on subsections of config space") I''ve been getting an MCA on the *2nd* boot of a driver domain using an e1000 NIC. Cset 14308 allowed the proper setup of the PM control registers, so the NIC is put in the D3 power state when the driver domain shuts down. Unfortunately, pci_set_power_state()

A character device for accessing (in user-space) pages that have been granted by other domains. Signed-off-by: Derek Murray <Derek.Murray@cl.cam.ac.uk> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, I run a fully updated CentOS 4.4 machine. This morning I got the errors below in my daily Logwatch report (Sendmail part). What has happend? Just some new bogus spammer that cant get the protocol right or is the server under attack? I have googled around but cannot fins any answer or I just suck at googleing... Any ideas ? Jens --------------------- sendmail Begin

Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need to stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today, my maillog look like : 4624 at myserver.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=myserver.com [127.0.0.1] Jun 14 19:07:01 at6412 sendmail[24627]: q5EN71jC024627: from=<>, size=3958, class=0, nrcpts=1,

Hey there, sorry to bug you, I've ran into a little problem conscerning a logcheck-rule I just wrote. I use logcheck and logcheck-database on Debian Etch. When logcheck reports me something I don't want it to, I normally write a rule to match that logentry and put it in a file called my_rules in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ ... that worked perfectly fine. Until that rule: Logcheck

>From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 5 08: 39:46 2006 Received: from spqr.komquats.com (cwfw [10.1.1.254]) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k65Fdk7u034242 for <cy@cwsys.cwsent.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:39:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org) Received: by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) id E55BF4C60B; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:39:45 -0700 (PDT)

Good Day I am having the following serious problem. I am running CentOS 4.1 with dovecot 0.99.11. The users are using POP3 login to retrieve mail. For the last 2 days we have experienced the following problems. I have recreated all the users and reconfigured the dovecot,but the same problems occur. Please see attached /var/log/maillog messages It appears so users login whereas others

Am 25.11.2014 um 21:39 schrieb James B. Byrne: > This morning I discovered this in the logwatch report for our external MX > backup host. > > > STARTTLS: write error=syscall error (-1), errno=32, > get_error=error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0), retry=99, ssl_err=5: 206 > Time(s) > > > > I also see many entries similar to this: > > > > 8:

Hello, I have a client that wants to have a dedicated smtp sending host. But they have 2 separate domains then that don't want to have share IP address. The reasons from this is long and drawn out. Is it possible to setup postfix in a virtual host config, like apache for example, such that, domainA.com listens and sends on one IP address and domainB.com listens and sends on another address.

Hi, When php3 module is compiled in apache, files in any directory will be interpreted by the parser and executed. This is a security breach. There is a way to correct this? Any comments? Thanks, lacj --- <levy@null.net> Levy Carneiro Jr. Linux & Network Admin From mail@mail.redhat.com Sat May 8 02:32:02 1999 Received: (qmail 28372 invoked from network); 8 May 1999 07:05:57

I use the following code to do the depth first search on the DSGraph. And I always got this error message. Couldn't figure out what's wrong. Could you please let me know? Besides, I really have no idea about what those functions do. Is there any documentation about DSGraph functions besides the pool allocation paper? Thanks, xiaodong Code: for( df_iterator<DSNode*> I =

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:14:09 -0800 (PST) From: David Cantrell <david@slackware.com> To: slackware-security@slackware.com Subject: Security Patches for Slackware 7.0 Available There are several security updates available for Slackware 7.0. We will always post bug fixes and security fixes to the /patches subdirectory on the ftp site:

Hi List, I have a postfix server based on CentOS 5 in which I have been trying to add TLS encryption support for SMTP. From the localhost when I do an EHLO, following is the output [root at xxxxxxx ~]# nc localhost 25 220 xxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xx ESMTP Postfix EHLO localhost 250-xxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xx 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 41943040 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-STARTTLS 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-AUTH=PLAIN

Package: logcheck wanted to work on #195935, but found a less than funny issue, easy to reproduce: * remove some lines in front of your logfile * invoke logcheck you'll get a big email with all not matching lines from that log. not setting that to high priority because you are getting also the newer loglines. don't know if i find time that weekend. wanted to document it anyways. a++

Hi all, I having a problem with my sendmail server running on centos 5.7 x64. Sometimes when we send an email to microsoft exchange servers, sendmail says deferred or timeout. I do not know what is happening. Here is some details; [root at avgw ~]# sendmail -v -qRxxx at xxx.gov.qa Running /var/spool/mqueue/q0B7caw9023076 (sequence 1 of 2) <xxx at xxx.gov.qa>... Connecting to

Hi group, I'm trying to configure the email notification when a user leave a voicemail, but don't work (send email notification). I configured esmtp in my linux box, if a try to use it with command line, it works fine. (echo "Hello" | sendmail a@b.com -f b@c.com). My voicemail.conf [general] format=wav49 attach=yes serveremail=anonymous@abc.com fromstring=Asterisk