search for: eskdale

Hi, I'm not trying to rock any boats or make noise and I'm not interested in discussing politics either, but I just wanted to get a general feel for what the rest of the tinc community felt in regards to how the EU looks like it wants to completely break encryption and make tools like tinc unfeasible. Both Germany and France want this to happen and in the UK the snoopers charter has

Hi Jared, I've seen the same while testing on digital ocean, I think it's the context switching that happens when sending a packet. I've done some testing with wireguard and that has a lot better performance but it's still changing quite a lot and only does a subset of what tinc does so probably not a stable solution. Martin On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 18:05 Jared Ledvina <jared at

Just curious if there is any way to set the Subnet of an invitation. Thanks Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20170517/3be76840/attachment.html>

...nt to this topic: https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues/110 If I remember correctly I found that AWS EC2 instances have this problem less than DigitalOcean instances. On bare metal machines with tinc 1.0 and aes-128-cbc, I can get 90% of gigabit line speed over tinc. On 17/05/17 19:17, Martin Eskdale Moen wrote: > Hi Jared, > I've seen the same while testing on digital ocean, I think it's the > context switching that happens when sending a packet. > I've done some testing with wireguard and that has a lot better > performance but it's still changing quite a lot an...

...liepen/tinc/issues/110 > > If I remember correctly I found that AWS EC2 instances have this problem > less than DigitalOcean instances. > > On bare metal machines with tinc 1.0 and aes-128-cbc, I can get 90% of > gigabit line speed over tinc. > > On 17/05/17 19:17, Martin Eskdale Moen wrote: > > Hi Jared, > > I've seen the same while testing on digital ocean, I think it's the > > context switching that happens when sending a packet. > > I've done some testing with wireguard and that has a lot better > > performance but it's stil...