search for: error_op_pcmpeqq_272

...it for instance, making any error undetected. Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null br i1 %24, label %"assert failed183", label %"assert succeeded184&quot...

...en things-go-wrong, etc.). > Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 > %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null > br i1 %24, label %"assert failed183", label %"asse...

...bout right? > > Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert > succeeded146" > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, > %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 > %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null > br i1 %24, label %"assert failed183", label %"asse...

...gt; Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >> >> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert >> succeeded146" >> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, >> %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align >> 8 >> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null >> br i1 %24, label %"assert failed183...

...o, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >>>> >>>> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" >>>> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >>>> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >>>> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 >>>> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null >>>> br i1 %24, label...

...> > > > > > > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, > > > > > %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** > > >...

...; > > > > > Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 > %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null > br i1 %24, label %"assert failed183", label %"asse...

> On Feb 29, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Alina Sbirlea via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > All, > > To get the discussion going in a focused manner, here is an initial patch with a running test. The test is from the Halide suite and is checking the correctness of several simd operations. > (Notes: the patch is large due to the number of operations being tested;

...ng quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >>> >>> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert >>> succeeded146" >>> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, >>> %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >>> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >>> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, >>> align 8 >>> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null >>> br i1 %24, label %&q...

...>> >> Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >> >> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" >> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 >> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null >> br i1 %24, label %"assert failed183", l...

All, To get the discussion going in a focused manner, here is an initial patch with a running test. The test is from the Halide suite and is checking the correctness of several simd operations. (Notes: the patch is large due to the number of operations being tested; I expect a lot of changes before actually landing it, this is simply to continue the discussion using a concrete example.)