search for: error_data_list

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "error_data_list".

2017 Jun 27
0
[PATCH v3 3/5] threads: Use thread-local storage for errors.
...r_cb_stack *p, *next_p; + + free (error_data->last_error); + for (p = error_data->error_cb_stack; p != NULL; p = next_p) { + next_p = p->next; + free (p); + } + free (error_data); +} + +/* Free all the error_data structs created for a particular handle. */ +void +guestfs_int_free_error_data_list (guestfs_h *g) +{ + struct error_data *p, *next_p; + + gl_lock_lock (g->error_data_list_lock); + + for (p = g->error_data_list; p != NULL; p = next_p) { + next_p = p->next; + free_error_data (p); + } + + g->error_data_list = NULL; + + gl_lock_unlock (g->error_data_list_lo...
2015 Jun 06
0
[PATCH 3/5] threads: Use thread-local storage for errors.
...r_cb_stack *p, *next_p; + + free (error_data->last_error); + for (p = error_data->error_cb_stack; p != NULL; p = next_p) { + next_p = p->next; + free (p); + } + free (error_data); +} + +/* Free all the error_data structs created for a particular handle. */ +void +guestfs_int_free_error_data_list (guestfs_h *g) +{ + struct error_data *p, *next_p; + + gl_lock_lock (g->error_data_list_lock); + + for (p = g->error_data_list; p != NULL; p = next_p) { + next_p = p->next; + free_error_data (p); + } + + g->error_data_list = NULL; + + gl_lock_unlock (g->error_data_list_lo...
2015 Jun 16
5
[PATCH threads v2 0/5] Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previous discussion here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/thread.html#00048 v2: - Use a cleanup handler to release the lock. - Rebase to upstream. Note I have not fixed the problem(s) with error handling (patch 3).
2017 Jun 27
9
[PATCH v3 0/5] threads: Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previously posted in 2015: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html I have rebased and tidied up the patches, fixing a few spelling mistakes, but they are broadly the same as before. I also ran all the tests, which pass. As with the previous versions, this makes a change to the API, where you
2015 Jun 06
7
[PATCH 0/5] Add support for thread-safe handle.
This patch isn't ready to go upstream. In fact, I think we might do a quick 1.30 release soon, and save this patch, and also the extensive changes proposed for the test suite[1], to after 1.30. Currently it is not safe to use the same handle from multiple threads, unless you implement your own mutexes. See: http://libguestfs.org/guestfs.3.html#multiple-handles-and-multiple-threads These
2017 Jul 21
6
[PATCH v3 REPOST 0/5] threads: Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previously posted in 2015: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html This series was posted about 4 weeks ago: v3: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00287.html There is no change in this series except I rebased it against current upstream head and retested. Last time there