Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "erractic".
2004 Nov 29
1
Terminal Services + VoIP
...lace (every
workstation).
It's about 25 users, and about 30 phones.
At the moment their running on standard 10/100 switches. Nothing
special, so I am wondering if I should recommend Layer3 switching for
internal QoS?
>From my experience with Terminal Services, it's traffic can be 'erractic'.
--
Regards,
JB Hewitt
Business: http://www.stcpl.com.au
Blog: http://blade.lansmash.com
Best LAN ever: http://www.lansmash.com
How to ask a ?: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
2005 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] Still can't compile backend or frontend on Windows
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Matthew Bromberg wrote:
> It's a shame this fine tool can't get better installation support for
> Windows. If it did I suspect it would get a lot more coverage. After 5
Yup.
> months or so I still have no way to compile the backend tools let alone the C
> frontend on windows. I have tried both Cygwin and Mingw so far. MingW is
> preferrable
2005 Oct 30
3
[LLVMdev] Still can't compile backend or frontend on Windows
It's a shame this fine tool can't get better installation support for
Windows. If it did I suspect it would get a lot more coverage. After
5 months or so I still have no way to compile the backend tools let
alone the C frontend on windows. I have tried both Cygwin and Mingw so
far. MingW is preferrable since distributions of the binaries would not
require the cygwin.dll. It
2005 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] Re: Still can't compile backend or frontend on, Windows
...Unfortunately, I haven't got the guts nor
>time (and currently no windows/mingw platform) to go deeper into how to
>implement this functionality on the Windows platform.
>
>However, I have kept my notes how to get rid of these warnings and compile
>errors (possibly introducing erractic behavior) for the llvm tools. I'll
>happily provide these notes and my assistance for whom has the time to
>provide the community with binaries for Windows.
>
>Henrik.
>
>
>
>>I don't know what the deal is, because I don't use that platform. However,
>...