search for: erractic

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "erractic".

2004 Nov 29
1
Terminal Services + VoIP
...lace (every workstation). It's about 25 users, and about 30 phones. At the moment their running on standard 10/100 switches. Nothing special, so I am wondering if I should recommend Layer3 switching for internal QoS? >From my experience with Terminal Services, it's traffic can be 'erractic'. -- Regards, JB Hewitt Business: http://www.stcpl.com.au Blog: http://blade.lansmash.com Best LAN ever: http://www.lansmash.com How to ask a ?: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
2005 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] Still can't compile backend or frontend on Windows
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Matthew Bromberg wrote: > It's a shame this fine tool can't get better installation support for > Windows. If it did I suspect it would get a lot more coverage. After 5 Yup. > months or so I still have no way to compile the backend tools let alone the C > frontend on windows. I have tried both Cygwin and Mingw so far. MingW is > preferrable
2005 Oct 30
3
[LLVMdev] Still can't compile backend or frontend on Windows
It's a shame this fine tool can't get better installation support for Windows. If it did I suspect it would get a lot more coverage. After 5 months or so I still have no way to compile the backend tools let alone the C frontend on windows. I have tried both Cygwin and Mingw so far. MingW is preferrable since distributions of the binaries would not require the cygwin.dll. It
2005 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] Re: Still can't compile backend or frontend on, Windows
...Unfortunately, I haven't got the guts nor >time (and currently no windows/mingw platform) to go deeper into how to >implement this functionality on the Windows platform. > >However, I have kept my notes how to get rid of these warnings and compile >errors (possibly introducing erractic behavior) for the llvm tools. I'll >happily provide these notes and my assistance for whom has the time to >provide the community with binaries for Windows. > >Henrik. > > > >>I don't know what the deal is, because I don't use that platform. However, >...