search for: err_find_vq

...for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { callbacks[i] = virtblk_done; @@ -417,7 +411,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); if (err) - goto err_find_vqs; + goto out; for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); @@ -425,16 +419,12 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) } vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; - err_find_vqs: +out: kfree(vqs); - err_vqs: kfree(callbacks); - err_callbacks: kfree(names...

...for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { callbacks[i] = virtblk_done; @@ -417,7 +411,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); if (err) - goto err_find_vqs; + goto out; for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); @@ -425,16 +419,12 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) } vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; - err_find_vqs: +out: kfree(vqs); - err_vqs: kfree(callbacks); - err_callbacks: kfree(names...

...[i * 32]; > + } That 32 and pointer math hurts. Please create a structure and use an array everywhere. > + > + /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ > + err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); > + if (err) > + goto err_find_vqs; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { > + spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); > + vblk->vqs[i].vq = vqs[i]; > + } > + vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; > + > + err_find_vqs: > + kfree(vqs); > + err_vqs: > + kfree(callbacks); > + err_callbacks: > +...

...[i * 32]; > + } That 32 and pointer math hurts. Please create a structure and use an array everywhere. > + > + /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ > + err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); > + if (err) > + goto err_find_vqs; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { > + spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); > + vblk->vqs[i].vq = vqs[i]; > + } > + vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; > + > + err_find_vqs: > + kfree(vqs); > + err_vqs: > + kfree(callbacks); > + err_callbacks: > +...

...lbacks[i] = virtblk_done; + snprintf(&name_array[i * 32], 32, "req.%d", i); + names[i] = &name_array[i * 32]; + } + + /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ + err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); + if (err) + goto err_find_vqs; + + for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { + spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); + vblk->vqs[i].vq = vqs[i]; + } + vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; + + err_find_vqs: + kfree(vqs); + err_vqs: + kfree(callbacks); + err_callbacks: + kfree(names); + err_names: + kfree(name_array); + err_name_array...

...cks[i] = virtblk_done; + snprintf(vblk->vqs[i].name, VQ_NAME_LEN, "req.%d", i); + names[i] = vblk->vqs[i].name; + } + + /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ + err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); + if (err) + goto err_find_vqs; + for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { + spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); + vblk->vqs[i].vq = vqs[i]; + } + vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; + + err_find_vqs: + kfree(vqs); + err_vqs: + kfree(callbacks); + err_callbacks: + kfree(names); + err_names: + if (err) + kfree(vblk->vqs); +...

...for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { callbacks[i] = virtblk_done; @@ -420,7 +414,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); if (err) - goto err_find_vqs; + goto out; for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); @@ -428,16 +422,12 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) } vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; - err_find_vqs: +out: kfree(vqs); - err_vqs: kfree(callbacks); - err_callbacks: kfree(names...

...for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { callbacks[i] = virtblk_done; @@ -420,7 +414,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); if (err) - goto err_find_vqs; + goto out; for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); @@ -428,16 +422,12 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) } vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; - err_find_vqs: +out: kfree(vqs); - err_vqs: kfree(callbacks); - err_callbacks: kfree(names...

...for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { callbacks[i] = virtblk_done; @@ -420,7 +414,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); if (err) - goto err_find_vqs; + goto out; for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); @@ -428,16 +422,12 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) } vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; - err_find_vqs: +out: kfree(vqs); - err_vqs: kfree(callbacks); - err_callbacks: kfree(names...

...for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { callbacks[i] = virtblk_done; @@ -420,7 +414,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names); if (err) - goto err_find_vqs; + goto out; for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock); @@ -428,16 +422,12 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) } vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; - err_find_vqs: +out: kfree(vqs); - err_vqs: kfree(callbacks); - err_callbacks: kfree(names...

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi all, These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. As title said, request for your comments. Play it in Qemu with: -drive file=disk.img,format=raw,if=none,id=D22 \ -device virtio-nvme-pci,drive=D22,serial=1234,num_queues=4 The goal is to have a full NVMe stack from VM guest(virtio-nvme) to host(vhost_nvme) to LIO NVMe-over-fabrics

Hi all, These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. As title said, request for your comments. Play it in Qemu with: -drive file=disk.img,format=raw,if=none,id=D22 \ -device virtio-nvme-pci,drive=D22,serial=1234,num_queues=4 The goal is to have a full NVMe stack from VM guest(virtio-nvme) to host(vhost_nvme) to LIO NVMe-over-fabrics

Hi all: This series try to share MSIX irq for each tx/rx queue pair. This is done through: - introducing virtio pci channel which are group of virtqueues that sharing a single MSIX irq (Patch 1) - expose channel setting to virtio core api (Patch 2) - try to use channel setting in virtio-net (Patch 3) For the transport that does not support channel, channel paramters were simply ignored. For

Hi all: This series try to share MSIX irq for each tx/rx queue pair. This is done through: - introducing virtio pci channel which are group of virtqueues that sharing a single MSIX irq (Patch 1) - expose channel setting to virtio core api (Patch 2) - try to use channel setting in virtio-net (Patch 3) For the transport that does not support channel, channel paramters were simply ignored. For