search for: ermok

I''m finding that I''m writing sets of very similar scenarios to check access permissions for each of my actions. Does anyone have suggestions on how to dry this up: Given an existing Account And a logged in Admin When the user visits account/manage Then he should get access Given an existing Account And a logged in Manager When the user visits account/manage Then he should get

I''ve developed a module to include in ActiveRecord derived classes. Can I test the module without having to tie it to a particular class? atm, I''m including it in my User class and writing the tests in user_spec.rb, but I don''t like the idea of tying the module tests to those of the class. I may extract the specs to a shared description and include that in the specs for

I see that rails handles exceptions in stories by rendering public/500.html, whereas in controller specs exceptions are re-raised. Is it possible to have this same behaviour in stories so I can check the correct exceptions are being raised? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/re-raise-exceptions-in-stories--tp15076254p15076254.html Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive

hi all I''m running background tasks using BJ 1.0.1 (gem version). On some requests, the tasks are executed as expected. On others, I get the following error: RuntimeError (no bj found in ["/u/apps/igniter/releases/20080408205801/ script", "/bin", "/usr/bin", "/sbin", "/usr/sbin"]): when it runs, it runs fine but does anyone know what