search for: ergh

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ergh".

Did you mean: argh
2005 Mar 17
1
[LLVMdev] Adding system libraries to the LLVM build
...bout the exact details later?). > In particular, I don't know the appropriate way to autoconf this, > though I'm sure there is some standard way to do it. Right. I've found a couple of pthreads autoconf macros but the systems I have access to all have autoconf 2.57, not 2.59. Ergh. I'm not going to worry about autoconf for now, but I'll see if I can find a more up to date. > I think that ideally eventually the interpreter should support threads > as well, but it's not worth actually doing the work now, so I wouldn't > worry about it. Hmm... I c...
2004 Aug 11
2
StanaPhone and Asterisks
I am trying to get Asterisks to connect to our StanaPhone so that I can use it to route my outgoing PSTN calls to. We have a free account and if I can get this working are willing to pay for an actual minutes with them. Here is what I have in my sip.conf: [stanaphone] type=friend secret=pAsSwOrD ; skewed for this message. username=3475341914 host=sip.stanaphone.com
2005 Mar 16
0
[LLVMdev] Adding system libraries to the LLVM build
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Evan Jones wrote: > I'm back working on my threading patch for the LLVM JIT after being > distracted by a paper deadline. I think I have things working nicely on Mac > OS X (I just did a CVS up and it will take another hour or two to build), but > I'm having an issue with building on Linux. Specifically, "lli" fails to link > because it now
2005 Mar 16
2
[LLVMdev] Adding system libraries to the LLVM build
I'm back working on my threading patch for the LLVM JIT after being distracted by a paper deadline. I think I have things working nicely on Mac OS X (I just did a CVS up and it will take another hour or two to build), but I'm having an issue with building on Linux. Specifically, "lli" fails to link because it now needs to link against libpthread, because it ends up pulling
2007 Sep 18
10
Routes
hi all, I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest of the routing would be done at the controller level.
2013 Dec 04
3
BIND segway -> python -> first-class ports
On 12/4/13, 9:05 AM, Mark Felder said: ----------------- > There was no alternative; we couldn't keep BIND in base. BIND 9 will > certainly have a EoL before the EoL of FreeBSD 10.x, and we can't use > BIND 10 because it requires importing Python to base. I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that we should have a minimal Python in "base". More and more people