search for: er0

...32, the return values are stored in their designated return registers (like how other targets does it). For i64 and f64 types, in the function call, after pushing the function parameters into the stack, the address of the allocated return memory space is assigned to a 16-bit register (In our case, ER0). This is done by assigning the frame pointer register into ER0 and then adding the offset to it. So the output assembly code would somewhat look like the following: Expected Target ASM output for i64 function call with i64 return type: 1 push qr0 ;; 64-bit parameter pushed i...

...have also tried implementing SRET processing similar to x86’s implementation, this saves the Register %0 value into another register but it is stored after the store node (starting from the EntryToken). Refer to dag_sret_proc.pdf for the DAG visualization for this. sret-demotion automatically sets er0(16-bit register, copied into Register %0) as a livein function argument containing the return memory location in LowerFormalArguments. er0 is a sub register of the qr0(i64 register) used in the processing. I think I was not able to inform the backend that if qr0 is modified, er0 is modified as well...

...tically listed which caused the overlapping. This was solved by declaring subregisters of subregisters as Aliases. With this solution, The target now generates assembly for the function as expected. Special thanks to Eli for the help! The problem now is, during function call, there is a CopyToReg(ER0(16-bit Reg), FrameIndex) generated, saving the pointer to the i64 return value memory location in int form into a register. The plan is to extract the frame address and offset from the FrameIndex node and perform CopyToReg(ER0, (frame address + offset)). - These DAG nodes are being created in...

...If I try to login in, with my login and password, I see with ngrep that Dovecot ask the AD for my data AND GET THEM, then I see: T 10.0.46.4:49204 -> 192.168.168.23:389 [AP] 0p...ck."DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=company,DC=local................4....samAccountName..bertoncello....objectClass..user0. # T 192.168.168.23:389 -> 10.0.46.4:49204 [AP] 0........e................000004DC: LdapErr: DSID-0C0906E8, comment: In order to perform this operation a successful bind must be completed on the connection., data 0, v1db1. This is what I see in Dovecot's log: Jun 23 11:26:43 proxy01...

Hi all, I recently upgraded from courier to dovecot 1.1.12 on a Solaris 9 system with about 100 users. We have been testing dovecot for sometime in a mixed Linux/Solaris environment and are aware of the index endianess issue with multiple archs. To solve this, we run with INDEX=MEMORY (as seen in the docs) so that only Linux clients have anything to do with the indexes. We generally have

...436c ser20F..objectCl 0x02f0: 6173 7331 3704 0374 6f70 040c 706f 7369 ass17..top..posi 0x0300: 7841 6363 6f75 6e74 0406 7065 7273 6f6e xAccount..person 0x0310: 0414 6f72 6761 6e69 7a61 7469 6f6e 616c ..organizational 0x0320: 5065 7273 6f6e 0404 7573 6572 301b 0412 Person..user0... 0x0330: 7573 6572 4163 636f 756e 7443 6f6e 7472 userAccountContr 0x0340: 6f6c 3105 0403 3531 3230 2204 0a70 7764 ol1...5120"..pwd 0x0350: 4c61 7374 5365 7431 1404 1231 3331 3234 LastSet1...13124 0x0360: 3139 3936 3137 3030 3030 3030 3030 1304 19961700000000.. 0x...

...vsL-PjnH-q#Q5A6^P}%%x+~Q{juuR zZY6Q=sC!+R-3o=EvX0Sjr<o%%z!Y6%X1<juqM&sgblD18hoIFQG$SB_RwHOF2fbhg zt at Yy8=$u>gmRGzbu{{b_iFoXQqMG`jr+0?h1q%z$=T1-7=`o$2oYRwcdUiQI9ijGG z;_dYD>hS0aOMZ2{ien!7{QyFKDUUH;^?JM-PWA=~t1a^a5&I(WW#ObQb>6LL<rQlz z{2yDQy8n;i&gYN?+!exo(=hA at Qz~#*y-Er0(IW0q3-|AM{NVb18)5yP8W-k3F1QsM zB~Rbd;EHWT1^iDX^FL;;fwEvp?<>SgZBTQqCB{|Q^h9~lEXEaSj4+|$F(VDDZkN#^ zF7g;%QZONG>Psa1&}fNd#+OJ^dL^a%GfJ0LSiL)|6fO&I2d|n{^6AcyIk=4D^5Xh} z`P9SR-L_Gen;{bgG9ar$kOgY_w4oP6FqgOzYjI at cwr#=0g%y>{991VcM4!kC(Ic}| zHD>EWU$Fk$6=r$=mIYEkgA at 27fKA+`v0eiU9%g...