search for: equivolent

Tobias, My hope is that now is the time when owners of bots using autoconf will be migrating them to CMake, however I don’t expect that all the autoconf bots need to be migrated. My strong suspicion is that many of the autoconf bots that are remaining have CMake-equivolent bots already, so they can just be deactivated. -Chris > On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:06 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > On 01/12/2016 06:35 PM, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev wrote: >> Now that 3.8 is imminently branching with the newly deprecated autoconf I thin...

...wine or VMWare, but I'd rather use wine for efficiency sake. I've researched and tried numerous dll overrides, to no avail. My company purchased the licenses for this just before I made the platform switch, so I'd like to stick with the tool if possible, and I have yet to find an equivolent application native in Linux. Thanks for any and all help, I'll happily provide whatever information I need to. Happy New Years! Mike. P.S. Distribution: Fedora Core 4 Architecture: i686

Now that 3.8 is imminently branching with the newly deprecated autoconf I think it is time to propose a process and timeline for removing autoconf support from trunk. At this point I believe there should be no users of autoconf for Clang and LLVM that are not supported by CMake, so I would like to propose dropping autoconf support from the cfe and llvm repositories on January 26th (two weeks from