search for: equivalence_partitioning

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "equivalence_partitioning".

2018 Mar 20
2
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...rts to have them. > > Still not sure I follow all of this - though perhaps the test design > discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad subject/topic/ > name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence > partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning - > helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/ > permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class". > > - Dave   Equivalence classes are a fine way to reduce duplication in manually written tests. They tend to depend on a...
2018 Mar 22
2
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...t sure I follow all of this - though perhaps the test design >> > discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad >> subject/topic/ >> > name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence >> > partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning - >> > helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/ >> > permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class". >> > >> > - Dave >> >> Equivalence classes are a fine way to reduce duplication i...
2018 Mar 22
0
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...t; > Still not sure I follow all of this - though perhaps the test design > > discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad > subject/topic/ > > name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence > > partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning - > > helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/ > > permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class". > > > > - Dave > > Equivalence classes are a fine way to reduce duplication in manually > written...
2018 Mar 23
0
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...all of this - though perhaps the test design >>> > discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad >>> subject/topic/ >>> > name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence >>> > partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning - >>> > helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/ >>> > permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class". >>> > >>> > - Dave >>> >>> Equivalence classes are a fine way...
2018 Mar 20
0
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
On 19 March 2018 at 19:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:10 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> +Chandler who might have some thoughts on this. >> > > FWIW, I have no concerns about updating to a modern googletest. More > modern the better IMO if someone is willing to do
2018 Mar 19
2
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:10 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > +Chandler who might have some thoughts on this. > FWIW, I have no concerns about updating to a modern googletest. More modern the better IMO if someone is willing to do the work to make sure it works on all our platforms, etc. However: > Could you provide an example here of the