Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "equivalence_partitioning".
2018 Mar 20
2
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...rts to have them.
>
> Still not sure I follow all of this - though perhaps the test design
> discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad subject/topic/
> name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence
> partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning -
> helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/
> permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class".
>
> - Dave
Equivalence classes are a fine way to reduce duplication in manually
written tests. They tend to depend on a...
2018 Mar 22
2
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...t sure I follow all of this - though perhaps the test design
>> > discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad
>> subject/topic/
>> > name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence
>> > partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning -
>> > helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/
>> > permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class".
>> >
>> > - Dave
>>
>> Equivalence classes are a fine way to reduce duplication i...
2018 Mar 22
0
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...t; > Still not sure I follow all of this - though perhaps the test design
> > discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad
> subject/topic/
> > name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence
> > partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning -
> > helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/
> > permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class".
> >
> > - Dave
>
> Equivalence classes are a fine way to reduce duplication in manually
> written...
2018 Mar 23
0
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
...all of this - though perhaps the test design
>>> > discussion might be better in its own thread. But the broad
>>> subject/topic/
>>> > name of the stuff I'm interested in applying here is equivalence
>>> > partitioning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_partitioning -
>>> > helps explain the general idea of reducing "test all combinations/
>>> > permutations of cases" to "test representative cases from each class".
>>> >
>>> > - Dave
>>>
>>> Equivalence classes are a fine way...
2018 Mar 20
0
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
On 19 March 2018 at 19:56, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:10 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> +Chandler who might have some thoughts on this.
>>
>
> FWIW, I have no concerns about updating to a modern googletest. More
> modern the better IMO if someone is willing to do
2018 Mar 19
2
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:10 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> +Chandler who might have some thoughts on this.
>
FWIW, I have no concerns about updating to a modern googletest. More modern
the better IMO if someone is willing to do the work to make sure it works
on all our platforms, etc.
However:
> Could you provide an example here of the