search for: equivalen

...`main` and be done with it. But you'll probably find yourself implementing something like this: https://github.com/Leporacanthicus/lacsap/blob/master/runtime/main.c either way, even if it's not precisely called `main`, and isn't written in C. Yes, it's necessary to call `_start` or equivalen, if you want to `stdin` and `stdout`, to initialize those - but sooner or later, you'll end up wanting to buffer I/O a little bit beyond calling the OS read/write operations (`write` is pretty rubbish for implementing `printf` or Pascal's `writeln` - because you get far too many user-kernel...

...ith it. But you'll probably find yourself implementing something like this: > https://github.com/Leporacanthicus/lacsap/blob/master/runtime/main.c > either way, even if it's not precisely called `main`, and isn't written in C. > > Yes, it's necessary to call `_start` or equivalen, if you want to `stdin` and `stdout`, to initialize those - but sooner or later, you'll end up wanting to buffer I/O a little bit beyond calling the OS read/write operations (`write` is pretty rubbish for implementing `printf` or Pascal's `writeln` - because you get far too many user-kernel...

You guys are saying that the library which defines the runtime library is written in C for many languages. The problem is that such functions are in the libc and so the object files have to be linked against the **entire** libc. Sorry if I'm wrong but isn't it a little inefficient or hard to handle? With "hard to handle" I mean the entry point: if I use C's I/O operations,

I would like to do a logistic multiple regression on a binary variate, with what Genstat calls an offset, ie a regression variable with the coefficient constrained=1. I'm far from home and have Splus but not R here, but any information from either source would be very welcome. I'd hate to have to go back to using Genstat . . . Thanks, Ted. --------------- Dr E.A. (Ted) Catchpole

On 23 May 2016, at 12:16, Lorenzo Laneve <lore97drk at icloud.com> wrote: > > I'm not talking about a new library instead of the libc, I'm talking about letting people create a library optimized for a specific frontend, regardless of the target. It sounded as if you were talking about a library that sits underneath such a thing. Lots of languages have their own runtime

...973 -0.0740932834438 Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt 2.6722 2.6716 -0.0224534091759 Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-flt/Searching-flt 3.3246 3.324 -0.0180472838837 Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl 3.3563 3.3558 -0.0148973572088 Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalen 0.9735 0.9734 -0.0102722136620 Applications/Burg/burg 0.0008 0.0008 0.0 Applications/hbd/hbd 0.0018 0.0018 0.0 Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode 0.0243 0.0243...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only