search for: equality

Hi, I installed R 3.0.0 on a Windows 2008 Server. When I submitted the following code in R64, library(tools) testInstalledBasic(scope="devel") I get the following message in the R Console: > library(tools) > testInstalledBasic(scope="devel") running tests of consistency of as/is.* creating ?isas-tests.R? running code in ?isas-tests.R? comparing ?isas-tests.Rout? to

Hi R-devel, The following code: all.equal(baseenv(), baseenv()) gives the error when run in a clean R session with latest R-devel (r66650): kevin:~$ R --vanilla --slave -e "all.equal(baseenv(), baseenv())" Error in all.equal.envRefClass(target[[i]], current[[i]], check.attributes = check.attributes, : attempt to apply non-function Calls: all.equal ...

...s/entities/step_definitions/entity_steps.rb:20 expected #<ActiveSupport::Multibyte::Chars:0x2b4bb29e73d8 @wrapped_string="myuser legal name">, got "myuser legal name" (using .equal?) which to me says that I got what I expected (myuser legal name) but which fails the equality test nonetheless. However, if I switch the test to this: assert_equal(myentity.entity_legal_name,legal.hll_keycase) Then the step definition passes. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, The description of all.equal states "is.all.equal should be used for programming, typically in if expressions. It is a simple wrapper using identical as shown in the documentation there.", but is.all.equal is not explicitly defined there (although there is a hint in the comments that is.all.equal <- function(x,y) isTRUE(all.equal(x,y))). Could the documentation be corrected? (or

...ile to indicate what I'm really doing. I have been using test.equal for a few years in a fairly extensive set of tests for my time series library. My tests never get to the all.equal part of the default method, so I have only just noticed the absence of this function. This approach to testing equality works very well since it allows for a class specific definition of when things are equal. It was originally suggested to me by John Chambers, in the context of a question I had about error trapping which, since I'm on the subject, I will describe shortly in a separate post. One shortcoming of...

Dear All! If I try to compare the attributes of two objects, I find a surprising behaviour of attr.all.equal(). With identical attributes I receive the answert NULL. If the attributes differ, the answer is as expecxted and differences are shown. all.equal(attributes(), attributes()) instead returns TRUE, if attributes are equal. See example: v <- 1:5 attr(v, 'testattribute')

This arose in testing [.terms and has me confused. data(esoph)?? # use a standard data set t0x <- terms(model.frame( ~ tobgp, data=esoph)) t1 <-? terms(model.frame(ncases ~ agegp + tobgp, data=esoph)) t1x <- (delete.response(t1))[-1] > all.equal(t0x, t1x) [1] TRUE # the above is wrong, because they actually are not the same > all.equal(attr(t0x, 'dataClasses'),

I'm trying to set up my LDAP in preparation to configure my Samba PDC. In the Official Samba-3 HOWTO and Reference Guide it give instructions on howto setup slapd.conf (section 10.4.4.3) After modifying the file it instructs to run /sbin/splapindex -f /splapd.conf When I run this I get the following error: /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema: line 423: AttributeType not found:

>>>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>>> on Fri, 5 Apr 2019 11:12:48 -0400 writes: > On 05/04/2019 10:46 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: >> >> >> On 4/5/19 9:39 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>> On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: >>>> Duncan, >>>> ?? I should have

...s an empty result. And using all.equal(X,2.3978953) fails because X and 2.3978953 are of unequal lengths. So it would be nice if there were a function (which I can of course define for myself), say equals(), such that equals(X,2.3978953) (with optional "tol=" argument) would test for equality to within tolerance, and return a vector of TRUE/FALSE according to the values in X. Or, indeed, perhaps I am overlooking something. Ted. ------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at wlandres.net> Date: 01-Sep-2012 Time: 14:48:01 This message was...

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline The attached patch against R 2.2.0 makes the following improvements to the all.equal() function: 1. Check names! Stock R all.equal() (unlike S-Plus) ignores names completely on some objects. I consider this wrong - if the names are different, the object is NOT "the same". 2. When a

Dear all How should one parse all.equal() output? I'm specifically referring to the 'mean relative difference' messages. For example, > all.equal(pi, 355/113) [1] "Mean relative difference: 8.491368e-08" But I'm not sure how to understand these messages. When they're close to 0 (or 1xe-16), then it's intuitive. But when they're big, > all.equal(1, 4)

Try the following function (the name is supposed to be a joke, by the way), which will also do the right thing with NAs and characters. Use it as if(equal.enough(x,y)) rather than if(x==y), e.g. > equal.enough(0.1+0.2, 0.3) [1] TRUE My default of 15 significant figures may be overkill in many applications; be prepared to reduce this. Simon Fear "equal.enough" <- function(x, y,

...an objectclass SambaAccount, which in the LDAP server doesn;t exist. please help , to solve this Alexander ----------------------------------- at last here is the smaba.schema: attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.2.1.24 NAME 'sambaLMPassword' DESC 'LanManager Password' EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26{32} SINGLE-VALUE ) attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.2.1.25 NAME 'sambaNTPassword' DESC 'MD4 hash of the unicode password' EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26{32} SINGLE-V...

Hi! In a function, I may have an instance in which all elements are equal. > x <- rep(1,5) > > x [1] 1 1 1 1 1 > identical(x) Error in .Internal(identical(x, y, num.eq, single.NA, attrib.as.set)) : 'y' is missing > all.equal(x) Error in is.expression(x) : 'x' is missing > I don't care what particular value it is, I just want to know if they are all

Could some kindly tell me if I am supposed to be getting the same test statistic value with var.equal=TRUE and var.equal=FALSE in t.test ? set.seed(1066) x1 <- rnorm(50) x2 <- rnorm(50) t.test(x1, x2, var.equal=FALSE)$statistic # 0.5989774 t.test(x1, x2, var.equal=TRUE)$statistic # 0.5989774 ??? Here are my own calculations that shows that perhaps the result when var.equal=TRUE is

Some doxygen annotations are attached to the wrong entry, which can be misleading. This patch fixes the mistake everywhere I could find it. --- include/llvm/InstrTypes.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- include/llvm/MC/MCDirectives.h | 42 +++++++++++++++--------------- include/llvm/Pass.h | 10 +++--- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff

Below is a third cut at all.equal and the generic function test.equal which is intended to return a T/F value. There was a suggestion that "is.equal" rather than "test.equal" might be considered as a name. I have mixed feelings about this. I associate the "is" functions with inheritance rather than comparisons, but the "equal" part of the name makes it

Hi all, following sample code illustrates the problem : Date1 <- Date2 <- as.POSIXlt(seq.Date(as.Date("2010-04-01"),as.Date("2011-04-01"),by='day')) identical(Date1,Date2) all.equal(Date1,Date2) identical() gives the correct answer. As there is no all.equal method for POSIXlt objects, all.equal.list is used instead. Subsetting using [[]] doesn't work

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network