search for: epxlained

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "epxlained".

2017 Oct 01
3
XP auto enrollment error; TEMP profile
Am 01.10.2017 um 22:43 schrieb ToddAndMargo via samba: >> Is the customer using XP for all client machines or just select >> machines that may run some legacy app? > > The app will run on any version of Windows.  The reason for the XP > is that the customer doesn't believe in fixing what ain't broke it's your job to epxlain him *it is broken* because windows XP
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of an Inbounds GetElementPtr
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks - that makes sense. It's interesting that at -O3 the optimizer > can't reduce the below though - I'll dig into it a bit and see if I > can make a patch that fixes it: I'm unsure what you expect to happen below. It's not quite the same testcase. GVN will PRE the loads, so you
2014 Oct 28
4
security settings on [home] share for use in member server
Hi all, I am referring to the official wiki here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_home_share#Setting_up_the_share_and_filesystem_permissions I was struggling around for many hours before I have found out what caused my issue. Well, I have created the [home] share exactly as epxlained on the How-To, in detail: I am creating on the linux prompt at the member server the directory with "mkdir -p /srv/samba/home" and then I apply the Windows ACL settings as shown on the wiki link: "Authenticated Users" have read access on (this folder only) "Domain Admins&q...
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of an Inbounds GetElementPtr
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:57 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi - I've got a question about what optimizations the "inbounds" >> keyword of "getelementptr" allows you to use. In the code below, %five >> is loaded
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of an Inbounds GetElementPtr
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com> wrote: >> It's not quite the same testcase. > Yes - it's an extension of the first test case that I'd expect to be > optimised out in the same way as my earlier example (i.e., store a > value, read it back and branch on it). If you miss out the > "check.first.array.element" block
2017 Sep 30
3
XP auto enrollment error; TEMP profile
If this is a customer rather than your employer you may find that you need to just part ways, which I know isn't easy.   If you provide a customer with your professional advice, and they choose to ignore it, then I think you can't really help them. Is the customer using XP for all client machines or just select machines that may run some legacy app? Do you have at least one Win 7