Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "epsilon_ij".
Did you mean:
epsilon_i
2000 Mar 31
2
linear models
...dom effect intercept
term.
The reason why I want to do this is test for the significance of the
random effect intercept term. anova( , ) does not work for an lm model and
lme model together.
2) Is there some nice way of handling linear models which are of the form
response_ij = a_i + b_i x_ij + \epsilon_ij
where a_i and b_i are fixed effects, x_ij is given (continuous) data,
\epsilon_ij ~ N(0, \sigma^2), and the i's range over some group? This is
basically a group of regression models, but I want them handled as one
unit for the purposes of estimation of \sigma^2 etc. I know that lmList()
does...
2006 Nov 17
2
effects in ANCOVA
Dear R users,
I am trying to fit the following ANCOVA model in R2.4.0
Y_ij=mu+alpha_i+beta*(X_ij-X..)+epsilon_ij
Particularly I am interested in obtaining estimates for mu, and the effects
alpha_i
I have this data (from the book Applied Linear Statistical Models by Neter
et al (1996), page 1020)
y<-c(38,43,24,39,38,32,36,38,31,45,27,21,33,34,28)
x<-c(21,34,23,26,26,29,22,29,30,28,18,16,19,25,29)...
2006 Oct 22
1
Multilevel model ("lme") question
...ntra-subject trajectories of Y very close to linear. I'd like to check
whether slope (and maybe also offset) of this line are (in part) predicted
by X.baseline.
Thus, I think the multilevel model specification should be as follows (i =
subject, j=measurement):
y_ij = \beta_i + b_i * TIME_ij + \epsilon_ij,
with
b_i = \zeta_i0 + \zeta_i1 * X.Baseline
Is this correct?
Now, I am completely unsure how to "translate" this into the syntax needed
by lme.
Is there any standard procedure on how to get from e.g. the Laird&Ware'82
matrix model notation to the lme input?
And, in my case, is t...
2000 Mar 28
1
the function lme in package nlme
Dear people,
A somewhat clueless question follows:
I just discovered that the lme function in contrib package nlme for R,
while similar to the lme function in Splus, does not use the cluster
function option. This difference does not appear to be documented in the
V&R `R Complements' file.
I have data which is divided into 6 groups
The lme model is of the form (simplified from the actual