Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "epitath".
Did you mean:
epitaph
2016 Sep 11
2
[Target] AsmParser Error : key functions missing
Hi All,
I wrote a very crude and simple AsmParser for my backend. llvm-tablegen
also generates asm-matcher .inc file without any error. I have included the
.inc file in my class for AsmParser.
However, while building llvm, in linking stage for LTO, i am getting error
- undefined reference to functions - ComputeAvailableFeatures,
MatchInstructionImpl, MatchRegisterName and
2016 Apr 15
2
Debian release version numbers for the April 2016 sec release
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 15:31 +0100, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 15/04/16 14:54, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> > Yeah, i have an output of log level 10 while i do a wbinfo -u.
> >
> > As for the packages below.
> > 4.1.17, yes, im upgrading these as we speak, but now on hold due to
> > this problem.
> >
> > 4.2.20 .. error typo, is Version 4.2.10-Debian
>
2016 Apr 15
0
Debian release version numbers for the April 2016 sec release
...est CVE fixes.
>> OK, just who in Debian cannot read ??? :-D
> Rowland, please take more care in your statements.
OK, now I must take you to task Andrew, I was confused, the Samba
history web page clearly says 'do not use' but debian seems to be using
the versions that have that epitath, so I said ( in a jocular way, there
is a laughing smiley at the end) 'OK, just who in Debian cannot read
???' if that upsets you, well sorry, but it was not meant in that tone.
A quick post to the Samba mailing explaining everything just after the
CVE release was all that was required,...