search for: epastor

Are you asking what the parsing rules are, or how you should modify the LLVM code to achieve that result? If the latter, you haven’t really given enough detail here. What code, exactly, have you tried modifying? Do you have any ideas for how it could work? -Eli From: Eric Astor <epastor at google.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 2:44 PM To: Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] MASM & RIP-relative addressing Clarifying a minor copy/paste error, ml64.exe actually outputs: 0:...

Hi all, I'm trying to land (a rebased version of) http://llvm.org/D37461 - which should make it possible to handle x86 Intel assembly like mov eax, offset Foo::ptr + 1 (Currently, omitting the +1 works... but offset doesn't work in compound expressions.) I'm having trouble figuring out what inline assembly I can emit into the LLVM IR that will work properly. So far, the closest

Interesting - the patch doesn't address this yet. It looks like we have a difference (maybe bug?) in how we handle Intel vs. AT&T inline assembly: https://godbolt.org/z/GQw9ED Suppose we're expanding an operand with an 'i' constraint, where the operand is given as, e.g. (i32* @Bar). If the inline assembly is in Intel dialect, this expands as "Bar" in AT&T syntax

...f clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu is complete: Failure [failed test-stage1-compiler] Build details are at http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu/builds/24132 blamelist: Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org>, Matt Arsenault < Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com>, Eric Astor <epastor at google.com>, Craig Topper < craig.topper at intel.com>, Alina build #2255 of lld-x86_64-win is complete: Failure [failed test-check-all] Build details are at http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-win/builds/2255 blamelist: LLVM GN Syncbot <llvmgnsyncbot at gmail.com>, E...

Apologies - I apparently remembered part of the issue incorrectly, so this ended up quite confusing. The problem comes when referencing labels in a different section of the binary. To clarify, if I assemble the code: .data foo BYTE 5 .code mov eax, foo with Microsoft's ml64.exe, it emits an object file disassembling to: 0: 8b 05 00 00 00 00 mov eax, dword ptr [rip]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:32 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:07 PM Nico Weber via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> llvmbb's job is to inform people of build breaks. However, it seems to >> trigger for a big list of bots, and at least one of them seems to always be >>

Hi, folks. I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleeding-edge. They qualify as stable, but I wouldn't call them "production stable" since half the time a new one comes out, a fix for it comes out the next day. So... that said, what's a good version to linger on? I don't *need*

Hi all, While working on alias support for the LLVM-ML project, I ran into a feature implemented back in 2010: default-null weak externals in COFF, a GNU extension. https://reviews.llvm.org/rG17990d56907b I'd like to disable this feature when targeting MSVC compatibility. Does anyone have more context on this, and why it'd be a terrible idea? For context: This seems to be designed to let

Hi again, folks. I've been getting feedback from this list and elsewhere that softphones are generally not considered good enough for hardcore business use. Can someone point me to where I can find more detail on this debate? Is the problem that the technology isn't mature, that the load on the computer is too high, or simply that it doesn't work well in a poorly designed

Hi, folks. I am planning on implementing Asterisk in 2006, and need to budget for it now, so I need to know what I'll need to get. My company has about 50 users, and is currently languishing on a very old Comdial PBX. All of our client computers are Macs; our servers are mostly OS X, with a couple Debians and a Red Hat. I am thoroughly experienced at systems administration, and can

Hi. As recommended by this list, I am setting up Asterisk@Home in order to start learning what I need to learn in order to start learning how to learn how to learn Asterisk, VOIP, telephony, etc.. Or something like that. :) I am following the wonderful instructions on: http://chayden.net/Asterisk/SeUpAsteriskAtHome.htm From that page, it looks like I can just get away with a $5.95/month

I understand this question is over-broad, but hopefully you can have patience with a newbie and toss me a bone... I am in the testing stage of deploying Asterisk. I have successfully configured it to work behind the NAT of my ZyXEL ZyWALL 35 firewall. However, I think there is a lot of tuning I can do to get better reliability, bandwidth management, and maybe QoS from the firewall. I

Hi folks. Thanks for having patience with a newbie... I am going through the setup exercise at http://chayden.net/Asterisk/SeUpAsteriskAtHome.htm I am trying to do it all on BroadVoice since this is just experimental, and the 100 minutes of outgoing from them should be enough for now. So I set up BroadVoice for both inbound and outbound, using a combination of the instructions referenced