search for: eor

...quot; "NA" > [2,] "testB" "2.1" "NA" "testA" > [3,] "testC" "1.3.1" "NA" "NA" > With the attached write.dcf() it returns TRUE. > > The diff would be > 19,22c19,24 > < eor <- character(nr * nc) > < eor[seq.int(1, nr - 1) * nc] <- "\n" > < writeLines(paste(formatDL(rep.int(colnames(x), nr), c(t(x)), > < style = "list", width = width, indent = indent), eor, > --- >> tx <- t(x) >> not....

..." "0.1-1" "" "NA" [2,] "testB" "2.1" "NA" "testA" [3,] "testC" "1.3.1" "NA" "NA" With the attached write.dcf() it returns TRUE. The diff would be 19,22c19,24 < eor <- character(nr * nc) < eor[seq.int(1, nr - 1) * nc] <- "\n" < writeLines(paste(formatDL(rep.int(colnames(x), nr), c(t(x)), < style = "list", width = width, indent = indent), eor, --- > tx <- t(x) > not.na <- c(!is.na(tx)) >...

...m_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:12:2: error: unknown directive .syntax unified ^ /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:25:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'eor' eor r1, r0, r0, ror #16 ^~~ /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:26:15: error: unknown token in expression bic r1, r1, #0xff0000 ^ /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:27:3: error: unknown use of instruct...

Dear R-Help, I am trying to perform forward selection on the following coxph model: >my.bpfs <- Surv(bcox$pfsdays, bcox$pfscensor) > b.cox <- coxph(my.bpfs ~ Cbase + Abase + Cbave + CbSD + KPS + gender + as.factor(eor) + Age)>stepAIC(b.cox, scope=list(upper =~ Cbase + Abase + Cbave + CbSD + KPS + gender + as.factor(eor) + Age, lower=~1), direction= c("forward")) However the following code returns the full model. How do I write the code so that forward selection is performed? Thanks, Rupa [[alter...

I am currently trying to compile a pretty simple program to work on an experimental board. It contains an (FPGA-version of) an ARMv4 processor. So basically, I try this (on my Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS): clang -v --target=arm-none-eabi -c barehello.c -o barehelloCLANG.o clang -v --target=arm-none-eabi -c io.c -o io.o clang -v --target=arm-none-eabi barehelloCLANG.o io.o -o helloCLANGstatic -static

...b/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:12:2: error: unknown directive >> .syntax unified >> ^ >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:25:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'eor' >> eor r1, r0, r0, ror #16 >> ^~~ >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:26:15: error: unknown token in expression >> bic r1, r1, #0xff0000 >> ^ >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins...

...b/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:12:2: error: unknown directive >> .syntax unified >> ^ >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:25:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'eor' >> eor r1, r0, r0, ror #16 >> ^~~ >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:26:15: error: unknown token in expression >> bic r1, r1, #0xff0000 >> ^ >> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins...

...builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S > > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:12:2: error: unknown directive > > .syntax unified > > ^ > > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:25:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'eor' > > eor r1, r0, r0, ror #16 > > ^~~ > > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:26:15: error: unknown token in expression > > bic r1, r1, #0xff0000 > > ^ > > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builti...

...pecific to my setup or a global phenomenon. So far, ActiveRecord::Base and its descendants are the only classes with which I see this behaviour and furthermore it seems to be limited to Ruby 1.9.1. Mayday! Thanks, Niels (about to dig into array.c) $ ruby --version; rails --version; ruby <<EOR require "rubygems" gem "activerecord" require "activerecord" puts "\nActiveRecord::Base disappears:" [1,String,''foo'',ActiveRecord::Base].collect {|a,b| puts [a,b].inspect} puts "\nActiveRecord::Base stays:" [1,String,''fo...

I was wondering if there was a way to recompile ogg123 so that it didnt look for "Ogg" at the start of each file. Ie change it so it looked for "Dog" or something. Why you ask? because in theory Im not ment to have any music files on my work computer NFI why but just cant. If I could mask an ogg file to look like another file then I could beat the system. Assuming that they even know what Ogg Vorbis is. the bits in the header I would like to change are Ogg vorbis Xiphophorus libVorbi...

...gt;> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:12:2: error: unknown directive > >>> .syntax unified > >>> ^ > >>> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:25:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'eor' > >>> eor r1, r0, r0, ror #16 > >>> ^~~ > >>> /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:26:15: error: unknown token in expression > >>> bic r1, r1, #0xff0000 > >>> ^ > >>>...

...s/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:12:2: error: unknown directive > .syntax unified > ^ > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:25:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'eor' > eor r1, r0, r0, ror #16 > ^~~ > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:26:15: error: unknown token in expression > bic r1, r1, #0xff0000 > ^ > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:27:3: er...

...defined and predictable. - The generated bitpattern is defined. - The generated bitpattern differs from the reference bitpattern. - for LLVM r157187 (updated at 2012-05-21 14:18:06 BST.) - for LLVM built with no assertions[2] The full log from MC Hammer is very large (>16GB) this is theoretically available on request. Of more interest, is the attached triaged summary of these logs, showing that there are six bugs of this kind found (summary from log reproduced below [3]). If anyone is interested in seeing the results for any particular slice of the test space then I will consider...

...s/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:12:2: error: unknown directive > .syntax unified > ^ > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:25:3: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'eor' > eor r1, r0, r0, ror #16 > ^~~ > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:26:15: error: unknown token in expression > bic r1, r1, #0xff0000 > ^ > /home/llvm_all/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/arm/bswapsi2.S:27:3: er...

...g-only=regcoalescing to see what is going wrong. If you want to take a look at this yourself, the issue is easy to reproduce with Thumb1: $ cat > test.c typedef unsigned long long t; t foo(t a, t b) { t a4 = b^a^18; return a4; } $ clang -cc1 -triple thumbv5-u-u -S -O2 test.c -o - [...] eors r1, r3 mov r3, r0 eors r3, r2 movs r0, #18 eors r0, r3 bx lr [...] -Eli

..., r0, r1 %tmp1 = xor i32 4294967295, %b ; %tmp2 = or i32 %tmp1, %a -- > orn r0, r0, r1 %tmp = xor i32 %b, 4294967295 ; %tmp1 = and i32 %a, %tmp -- > bic r0, r0, r1 But this doesn't: %tmp = xor i32 %b, 4294967295 ; %tmp1 = and i32 %tmp, %a -- > eor r1, r1, #4294967295 ; and r0, r1, r0 On the surface it seems that the selector is not commuting the AND operands. I've attached the complete test files. I can take a look but I need a pointer to get started. David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

I've seen this posting before but I need to get a grasp on this. I am using winbindd for users that don't have a local account on a Linux box. I thought that placing the entries below in the smb.conf would create users in ou=Idmap. Instead the ou=Idmap increments the uidNumber with every user that is added,but the user ID mappings are stored in /usr/local/var/locks/winbindd_idmap.tdb. What

...967295, %b ; %tmp2 = or i32 %tmp1, %a -- > > orn r0, r0, r1 > %tmp = xor i32 %b, 4294967295 ; %tmp1 = and i32 %a, %tmp -- > > bic r0, r0, r1 > > But this doesn't: > > %tmp = xor i32 %b, 4294967295 ; %tmp1 = and i32 %tmp, %a -- > > eor r1, r1, #4294967295 ; and r0, r1, r0 > > On the surface it seems that the selector is not commuting the AND > operands. I've attached the complete test files. I can take a look > but I need a pointer to get started. No, isel is trying to commute the AND. See ARMGenDAGISel.inc (...

Hi Borja, > Without doing what i mentioned and letting LLVM expand all operations wider > than 8 bits as you asked, the code produced is excellent supposing that many > of the moves there should be 16 bit moves reducing code size and right > register allocation, also something important for me is that the code is > better than gcc's. When i say right reg allocation it doesnt

...vector_und +.swi: .long vector_swi +.pabt: .long vector_pabt +.dabt: .long vector_dabt +.adx: .long vector_reserved +.irq: .long vector_irq +.fiq: .long vector_fiq + + .align 5 +vector_reset: +1: + b 1b + + .align 5 +vector_irq: + SAVE_CONTEXT 0x18, 4 + + mrs r0, spsr + and r0, r0, #PSR_MODE_MASK + eors r0, r0, #PSR_MODE_SVC + + bne return_to_guest + + cpsid i + + RESTORE_CONTEXT + + .align 5 +vector_dabt: + str r0, [sp, #-16] + str lr, [sp, #-12] + mrs r0, spsr + str r0, [sp, #-8] + sub r0, sp, #16 + + msr cpsr_cxsf, #(PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT | PSR_MODE_SVC) + + sub sp, sp, #CT...