search for: enviously

...ards? I spent the last few hours moving my project (extempore.moso.com.au) over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to discover no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function level. This is absolutely mandatory for my project. I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously my fault, I wasn't paying close enough att...

On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of money to tend systems over new year's eve/day. I was working for an ISP at the time and got none of this. Nothing happened. I don't even recall

...ving my project (extempore.moso.com.au<http://extempore.moso.com.au>) over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to discover no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function level. This is absolutely mandatory for my project. I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously my fault, I wasn't paying close enough att...

Gents, We''re hard at work on a new Rails app. We''re a small group of developers...not a web designer in the bunch. We know CSS enough to be dangerous, but we shy away from the "softer" skills (all the while envious of those with that capability). We intend to grow our application in terms of functionality, but I need to make sure we keep an eye towards

...gt; over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to > discover **** > > no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function > level. **** > > This is absolutely mandatory for my project. **** > > ** ** > > I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a **** > > couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was **** > > attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly**** > > concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously &g...

...ving my project (extempore.moso.com.au<http://extempore.moso.com.au>) over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to discover no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function level. This is absolutely mandatory for my project. I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously my fault, I wasn't paying close enough att...

...ving my project (extempore.moso.com.au<http://extempore.moso.com.au>) over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to discover no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function level. This is absolutely mandatory for my project. I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously my fault, I wasn't paying close enough att...

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:46 PM Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: > > On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. > > I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these > people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of > money to tend systems over

Is it possible to create an alternate list for the people who insist on spending their days posting long-winded political commentary and opinion? Maybe something like centos-offtopic? Reading the list has gone from "fun" status to "chore." Just a suggestion. Cheers, C

...gt; over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to > discover **** > > no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function > level. **** > > This is absolutely mandatory for my project. **** > > **** > > I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a **** > > couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was **** > > attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly**** > > concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously &g...

...moving my project (extempore.moso.com.au) > over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to > discover > no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function > level. > This is absolutely mandatory for my project. > > I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a > couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was > attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly > concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously > my fault, I wasn't pay...

>Hey, ktorrent looks pretty good! >Thanks for the hint! Maybe it's time to give KDE a second look :) LEC

Does * support ISDN Primary Rate Interface (PRI) - 2B Transfer Capability for T-1/PRI? In other words the ability to take a call and join it to another call and then drop off letting the CO-switch take over. -Kevin Kevin Fjelsted, President AltiCom CTI, Inc. Track Me Down! One number Access, Press 11# during the voice mail message greeting to have me F-O-U-N-D! Phone: 612.259.0722 Fax:

So, after some discussion of our new control workstations, we are iterating in on a solution; we are looking at a 1U short-depth SuperMicro SuperServer 5017R-MF with a graphics card in the PCI-Ex16 expansion slot. However, the display requirements have increased to 3 or more monitors for future expansion, so I was wondering whether anyone had any experience with triple- or quad-display single card

...ving my project (extempore.moso.com.au<http://extempore.moso.com.au>) over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to discover no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function level. This is absolutely mandatory for my project. I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously my fault, I wasn't paying close enough att...

On 09/14/2018 03:36 PM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > Hello, > > ok, I found that cpu pinning was wrong, so I corrected it to be 1:1. The issue > with iozone remains the same. > > The spec is running, however, it runs slower than 1-NUMA case. > > The corrected XML looks like follows: [Reformated XML for better reading] <cpu mode="host-passthrough">

Hello, so the current domain configuration: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='4-7' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='8-11' memory='62000000' /><cell cpus='12-15'

...gt; over to MCJIT (particularly for ARM), and am a little horrified to > discover **** > > no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a function > level. **** > > This is absolutely mandatory for my project. **** > > **** > > I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a **** > > couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was **** > > attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly**** > > concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglected. This is obviously &g...

Hallo Im using CentOS 7 Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version Thanks Johann Fock Von meinem iPad gesendet

..., and am a little horrified to >> discover **** >> >> no ability to compile, and just as importantly to recompile, at a >> function level. **** >> >> This is absolutely mandatory for my project. **** >> >> **** >> >> I have been looking enviously at MCJIT's ARM+DWARF support for a **** >> >> couple of years and was under the misapprehension that MCJIT was **** >> >> attempting to be a *drop-in* replacement for JIT. So I wasn't overly**** >> >> concerned about the primary JIT being largely neglect...