search for: entry_handler

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "entry_handler".

Did you mean: entry_handle
2019 May 24
0
[PATCH] VMCI: Fix integer overflow in VMCI handle arrays
The VMCI handle array has an integer overflow in vmci_handle_arr_append_entry when it tries to expand the array. This can be triggered from a guest, since the doorbell link hypercall doesn't impose a limit on the number of doorbell handles that a VM can create in the hypervisor, and these handles are stored in a handle array. In this change, we introduce a mandatory max capacity for handle
2014 Feb 26
1
help with gotoExitingHandler(R_NilValue, call, entry); . Implementation of error handling internally
...format, ap); while ((list = findSimpleErrorHandler()) != R_NilValue) { char *buf = errbuf; SEXP entry = CAR(list); R_HandlerStack = CDR(list); strncpy(buf, localbuf, BUFSIZE - 1); /* Rvsnprintf(buf, BUFSIZE - 1, format, ap);*/ buf[BUFSIZE - 1] = 0; if (IS_CALLING_ENTRY(entry)) { if (ENTRY_HANDLER(entry) == R_RestartToken) return; /* go to default error handling; do not reset stack */ else { SEXP hooksym, hcall, qcall; /* protect oldstack here, not outside loop, so handler stack gets unwound in case error is protect stack overflow */ PROTECT(oldstack); hooksym = inst...
2012 Oct 30
29
[PATCH 00/12] VMCI for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VMCI linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware. -split guest, host and core driver code into different files -use EXPORT_SYMBOLS_GPL -remove vmci_device_get and vmci_device_release APIs -simplify the event deliver mechanism -driver ioctl code cleanup -sparse clean * * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with
2012 Oct 30
29
[PATCH 00/12] VMCI for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VMCI linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware. -split guest, host and core driver code into different files -use EXPORT_SYMBOLS_GPL -remove vmci_device_get and vmci_device_release APIs -simplify the event deliver mechanism -driver ioctl code cleanup -sparse clean * * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with
2013 Jan 08
13
[PATCH 00/12] VMCI for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VMCI linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments. Summary of changes: - Rebase our linux kernel tree from v3.5 to v3.7. - Fix all checkpatch warnings and errors. Fix some checkpatch with -strict errors. This addresses Greg's comment: On 15 Nov 2012
2013 Jan 08
13
[PATCH 00/12] VMCI for Linux upstreaming
* * * This series of VMCI linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments. Summary of changes: - Rebase our linux kernel tree from v3.5 to v3.7. - Fix all checkpatch warnings and errors. Fix some checkpatch with -strict errors. This addresses Greg's comment: On 15 Nov 2012
2012 Oct 16
11
[PATCH 00/10] VMCI for Linux upstreaming
* * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (vmw_vmci) and VMCI Sockets (vmw_vsock) kernel modules for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vmci kernel module. The vmw_vsock kernel module will be presented in a later
2012 Oct 16
11
[PATCH 00/10] VMCI for Linux upstreaming
* * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (vmw_vmci) and VMCI Sockets (vmw_vsock) kernel modules for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vmci kernel module. The vmw_vsock kernel module will be presented in a later
2013 Nov 15
23
[PATCH -tip RFC v2 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series
2013 Nov 15
23
[PATCH -tip RFC v2 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined, it is easy to maintain. This series
2013 Nov 20
28
[PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined
2013 Nov 20
28
[PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist
Hi, Here is the version 3 of NOKPORBE_SYMBOL series. Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've introduced NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macros can be placed right after the function is defined