search for: entrusted

Hi I have compiled dovecot 2.3.6 on RH 8, and I copied the configuration from dovecot 2.0.9 however, when I try to connect the new machine the certificate is not recognized The same certificate is working with apache CONNECTED(00000004) depth=0 ... verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate verify return:1 depth=0 ... verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate

I appeal to those entrusted with the keeping of the R flame, the S flame, and the S-Plus flame to relate a bit of history. How did S, S-Plus, and R get their names? Going from S to S-Plus appears clear, a commercial company purchased rights to S, developed a product that they wanted to indicate was related to S, but was more...

Hi all, We have a small network with WinXP Prof SP2 machines and a Linux (Debian) PDC using Samba 3.0.22. We encountered the following situation: One user was not able to lo into the domain any more some days ago. Using logging on samba side, I found out that samba correctly authenticates the machine and the workstation. Though, XP did not log in, giving a message that the password might not

...d user after the > realtime scheduler is selected. Running as root after that is not > required. That does not solve the problem at all. If you run jackd as root, you must run *all* JACK clients as root. They are not all coded that way, and some cannot be. Neither they nor jackd should be entrusted with God-like superuser powers. -- joq

Another GlusterFS 3.1 question on my blog (http://cloudarchitect.posterous.com). Any help/ideas will be appreciated. Thanks Joshua ---- Here's my challenge: I have several 1 tb ebs volumes now that are un-replicated and reaching capacity. I'm trying to suss out the most efficient way to get each one of these into its own replicated 4 tb gluster fs. My hope was that I could snapshot

...ltime scheduler is selected. Running as root after that is not > > required. > > That does not solve the problem at all. If you run jackd as root, you > must run *all* JACK clients as root. They are not all coded that way, > and some cannot be. Neither they nor jackd should be entrusted with > God-like superuser powers. I can't really comment on jackd itself, as I haven't looked that much into it. If running jackd as root requires client apps to also run as root then that is a pretty bad issue. I would of thought that running jackd as a realtime process (whether root...

Karl Heyes <karl@xiph.org> writes: > Are you running with realtime privileges, for this you need to start as > root if you want that. Even with realtime privileges there may be odd > cases where the scheduling latency is a bit too high, it all depends on > the drivers and kernel version but the current state is not that bad and > getting better. There are several ways to

Hi - I have a similar question -- I really like using gmail.com, but I''m growing distrustful of entrusting any more of my personal information with Google. I''ve searched the rail list archives that I have (here in my gmail acct, ironic, eh?) but haven''t seen a mention of a web-based Rails powered email solution. Is there one available or in the works, or should I add

Due to unpleasant (but arguably valid) policy changes at work, any SSH server within the work firewall must accept only PKI authentication. Unless we can convince the higher-ups otherwise, we will also have to use the commercial SSH server within the firewall. Of course, I should be able to use whatever client I like. Unfortunately, it is not clear that I can get OpenSSH to use PKI authentication.

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:30 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Cal Webster wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 08:08 -0500, mark wrote: > >> On 12/03/14 17:34, Cal Webster wrote: > >> > Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in > >> > CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil > >> > web

Hello all, As some of you may already know from comments in the GitHub pull requests and other media, due to pre-emption by real life our long-term leader and main maintainer, Arnaud Quette, had to step down from this role and from intensive involvement in the NUT project (we hope he would still be able to help on occasion, time permitting). He asked the members of the core team to take over,

Hello all, As some of you may already know from comments in the GitHub pull requests and other media, due to pre-emption by real life our long-term leader and main maintainer, Arnaud Quette, had to step down from this role and from intensive involvement in the NUT project (we hope he would still be able to help on occasion, time permitting). He asked the members of the core team to take over,

Good Day, With warm heart I offer my friendship, and my greetings, and I hope this letter meets you in good time. It will be surprising to you to receive this proposal from me since you do not know me personally. However, I am sincerely seeking your confidence in this transaction, which I propose with my free mind and I hope you will open-heartedly read through and give me your most needed

On 9 May 2016 at 03:07, C Bergström <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > As activity on the thread dies down and I guess it has been socialized > to the point of annoyance (myself and probably others based on private > emails).. I'll assume the current draft is mostly stable, but to > confirm, Chandler are you done playing with your CoC? I personally think the code is fine

On Mon, June 20, 2016 13:16, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >>> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on >>> epistemology. >>> This is based on the experience (the evidence) of some of the >>> world's foremost experts in the

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:46 AM JF Bastien <jfbastien at apple.com> wrote: > And I do agree that if someone were to come in and put in the significant > amounts of work to make LLVM directly usable in security-sensitive places, > then we could support that. But none of that should have anything to do > with the security group or its membership. All of that work and discussion,

Hi, I was wondering how a linux box configured as a firewall stacked up against some of the commercial products like checkpoint-1 and gauntlet. Can someone direct me to a good book or online doc that compares linux to some other firewall methods? Mind you, I''m not talking about a firewall in the classical sense, ie ip forwarding turned off and used as a proxy, but the typical Linux box

Not sure if it''s been posted yet, my email is currently down... http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/10/suns_zfs_is_clo.html Interesting piece. This is the second post from Yager that shows solaris in a pretty good light. I particularly like his closing comment: "If you haven''t checked out ZFS yet, do, because it will eventually become ubiquitously implemented