search for: entrants

I have a list of entrants (1-14 in this example) in a competitive event and corresponding win probabilities for each entrant. [(1, 0.049), (2, 0.129), (3, 0.043), (4, 0.013), (5, 0.015), (6, 0.040), (7, 0.066), (8, 0.038), (9, 0.204), (10, 0.022), (11, 0.234), (12, 0.044), (13, 0.068), (14, 0.035)] So, of course...

...gible, an entrant must have designed and implemented a piece of statistical software. The applicant must have begun the development while a student, and must either currently be a student, or have completed all requirements for the last degree earned after January 1, 2000. To apply for the award, entrants must provide the following materials: A current CV. A letter from a faculty mentor at their academic institution. The letter should confirm that the software is the work of the student, certify the student status of the entrant when the software began to be developed (and either the current...

Hi, I am using clang::ToolInvocation class to compile some code in-memory: clang::tooling::ToolInvocation ti ( compilerArgs, new clang::EmitBCAction(), new clang::FileManager(clang::FileSystemOptions()) ); //filename is the name of the source file, e.g. "Somefile.cpp" //sourcecode contains the source of the file ti.mapVirtualFile( filename,

Hi, We installed the latest 1.4.24 on a test machine and can't get zaptel nor dahdi compile. It's a Linux Debian Etch. Errors we have: keewi:/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4# make make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-custom.2/build ARCH=i386 SUBDIRS=/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4/drivers/dahdi DAHDI_INCLUDE=/usr/src/dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4/include DAHDI_MODULES_EXTRA=" " HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes

Hello, I'm using asterisk for a while, fully ip, and i'm now moving to ISDN, so i got a TE110P. The first problem is the "Unexpected Channel selection 3" message. I'm unable to find, on the web, the meaning of such message. Can somebody explain me? My second problem is when a call come in, and hang up. Asterisk shows " -- B-channel 0/31 successfully restarted on

I made a try translating the group names one by one in the setup/provision_users.ldif file. The first groups went OK but when I translate "Incoming Forest Trust Builders" by "Générateurs d'approbations de forêt entrante", I get this error from the script : Traceback (most recent call last): File "source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision", line 1714, in

On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 05:30, Francisco Puentes wrote: > Hi again, and thanks (Reid) for your fast response: Glad to help. > > Yes, it works!!! Only changing the order of libraries in the Makefile. Great! > > Nowaday I have my software with the capability of compile assembly, bytecode > (from buffer and file) and link them with a set of libraries. It seems to > work

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > lost wrote: >> Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? > > You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to that. > Once your LazyFunctionCreator is called, you fill in the body and call > JIT->getPointerToFunction() on it and return that result. > > I

Tried configure of samba-3.2.0 on Sparc Solaris 9 with the following line: ./configure --with-ldap --with-ads --with-pam --with-winbind --with-krb5=/usr/local > $log 2>&1 There is a problem where the following error is produced: configure: error: Active Directory support requires ldap_initialize I can use the same line on samba-3.0.10 and it compiles and works. $

Hello, I've got an Asterisk server with a TDM400P with 2 FXO modules and 2 FXS modules. This server is connected to 2 PSTN lines and 2 analog phones. In my Zaptel configuration, I've defined 2 groups : one for the 2 FXO's and one for the 2 FXS. The asterisk server is just used to add a little IVR and Voicemail service. Eveything works fine, but sometimes the conversation is

Hello, I'm trying to use the version 0.6 of chan_capi-cm for outgoing calls it works perfectly but for incoming calls it doesn't work. I tried to set an extension to dial my from-pstn context and it works. So I think there's a problem with my capi.conf or something... Here's a debug when calling -- CONNECT_IND (PLCI=0x101,DID=9100,CID=46720XXXX,CIP=0x4,CONTROLLER=0x1)

The discussion of malloc optimization from two (three?) weeks ago prompts me to be concerned about implications for kernel compilation. Basically, I have two questions: 1. The particular optimization that was done there was based on the compiler substituting an alternate implementation of malloc(). This may not be appropriate in kernel or deeply embedded systems. Is there a way for someone who is

Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? > See ExecutionEngine::InstallLazyFunctionCreator(). > http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1ExecutionEngine.html#6a126d6cd1fa07a4331179597de0c46a > > Nick >

lost wrote: > Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to that. Once your LazyFunctionCreator is called, you fill in the body and call JIT->getPointerToFunction() on it and return that result. I haven't actually tried this, but it seems to be the only way to use this API, so I presume someone else has.

So you mean that is not the way. But what is InstallLazyFunctionCreator for? 2010/4/17 Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com>: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: >> lost wrote: >>> Ok than, but how to insert a call to an undefined function? >> >> You need to have the function declaration and insert a call to

Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: > Instead, just optimize the opus_select_arch() such that only > the first call to it takes more time, but subsequent calls to > it are much faster. This has been suggested before, but it is a bad idea. The patch posted below is not thread-safe or even re-entrant. You can argue that the results should always be the same, so it won't matter, but this is

So, in the ongoing saga of the unusual 1U short-depth workstation, we have narrowed the field to two choices. Both entrants are configured with 16GB memory (4x4GB), two 2.5" drives (1x250GB SSD and 1x1TB HDD), and an NVIDIA NVS510 graphic card (quad display): 1) SuperMicro 5017R-MF, Xeon E5-2609 processor 2) SuperMicro 5017C-LF, Xeon E3-1220 processor (I wish SuperMicro had a list of their servers by chassis some...

Digium is seeking customer success stories. If you have a nominee, you could win a prize of up to $1000 cash or $2000 in Digium hardware. Digium would like to contact these customers for possible use as references for press quotes and case studies. Depending on the customer and the Asterisk implementation, we will award a prize of up to $2000 in hardware or $1000 in cash. If you have any

Digium is seeking customer success stories. If you have a nominee, you could win a prize of up to $1000 cash or $2000 in Digium hardware. Digium would like to contact these customers for possible use as references for press quotes and case studies. Depending on the customer and the Asterisk implementation, we will award a prize of up to $2000 in hardware or $1000 in cash. If you have any

> 1. The particular optimization that was done there was based on the > compiler substituting an alternate implementation of malloc(). This may > not be appropriate in kernel or deeply embedded systems. Is there a way > for someone who is building that sort of system to enable/disable the > builtin library magic selectively? -ffreestanding > I assume that LLVM can support