search for: enthused

Hallo, Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a Slack for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, its a fantastic tool for community support with really nice features for computer centric discussion. https://enterpriselinux.slack.com/shared_invite/MTY4MTM5NjQ2NTc5LTE0OTE5OTkyNTctMjkyNGU1NWQzOA My hope is that those running

...t; > My hope is that those running Rhel and Centos can have a common place to > flame war about SystemD, what to do when FreeIPA replication breaks and > how > to give your network interfaces sensible names without having to use a > pastebin. > > Thoughts? Experiances? > Not enthused with slack. And here's a real question: were you talking about *instead* of this mailing list? I would very much not be happy with that, for the same reason I'm significantly less than enthused by "social media": I prefer actual written-out thoughts, and threads, and being able to...

Hello R users, before asking my question I'd like to stress that I'm an (absolute) beginner in using R, but enthused about the incredible possibilities of it. So I hope my questions are not too stupid. Here's my problem: I have a dataset with skewed distributions. In order to obtain approx multivariate normality by a Box-Cox-Transformation, I used the "Rfwdmv Package" to estimate a common value of...

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev at gmail.com> wrote: > Ping! > > Suggested is a wrapper over a raw pointer that is intended for freeing > wrapped memory at the end of wrappers lifetime if ownership of a raw > pointer was not taken away during the lifetime of the wrapper. > The main difference from unique_ptr is an ability to access the wrapped

> > Not enthused with slack. And here's a real question: were you talking > about *instead* of this mailing list? No, certainly not instead of. A mailing list is essential. I'm part of a few slack communities and it seems an excellent platform for realtime discourse and noob baiting. Very sadly the #ce...

...firewall also be the asterisk server, and hopefully gain some control of tcp flows that way to more highly prioritize voice traffic +apparent simplicity, maybe fax support -s it seems most of the ISDN cards in isdn4linux are not sold in the US, the technology is stagnant, and I'm less than enthused about statements like "Any CAPI based ISDN card will work" when I'd prefer something like ISDN card XXX tested on an opteron running kernel X.Y.Z, using multi-link ppp and and asterisk, no problems.... Any thoughts, sample configurations, other ideas?

...aybe owning" smart pointer, or > whether this is just an indication that the underlying data structure > is *wrong*. The idea of "maybe" and "owning" going to gether, in any > sense, seems flat out broken to me from a design perspective, and so > I'm not enthused about providing abstractions that make it easier to > build systems with unclear ownership semantics. -- Anton -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141002/c6a9d70e/attachment.html>

...proximation in general and nonlinear regression in particular? Or should I push on writing S-Plus code? > > Is anyone out there interested in assisting me with S-Plus code with the potential payoff of collaboration on a publication in the ecological literature? Obviously, I would be equally enthused if an R user was interested in a collaboration. Thanks in advance, Kristian -- Kristian Omland Postdoctoral Research Associate Vermont Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources University of Vermont Burlington VT 05405 voice: (802)656-...

...quot; smart pointer, or >> whether this is just an indication that the underlying data structure is >> *wrong*. The idea of "maybe" and "owning" going to gether, in any sense, >> seems flat out broken to me from a design perspective, and so I'm not >> enthused about providing abstractions that make it easier to build systems >> with unclear ownership semantics. >> >> >> -- >> Anton >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-d...

Hello LLVM Developers! Last year, the LLVM Foundation sponsored a booth at the Grace Hopper Conference. I had 2 amazing volunteers from the community, David Blaikie and Anna Zaks, help me spread the word about LLVM, compilers, and open source. It was a great experience and we are hoping to repeat this at the upcoming 2018 Grace Hopper conference in Houston, TX on September 26-28. I’m looking

I have the following in my dialplan, counts the number of loops and when it hits greater then 5, exit. It works, but errors initially with, "syntax error, unexpected TOK_PLUS, expecting TOK_MINUS or TOK_LP or tolken; Input: +1". Could somebody tell me why? Thanks: ; **************************************** ; Setup a varriable to count the number of ; times the message has been

...oes nothing but serve a JSON API. All of the models are well tested elsewhere, so I needn''t worry about that. My only immediate goal is to be able to fire off requests to a path and check the returned JSON. I''ve tried a number of methods for this today, without being particularly enthused about any of them. I started with user stories, but the conversion to english was difficult for something largely developer-facing. "When I get /widgets/:id" where :id is actually determined behind the scenes did not read well, and a lot of my expectations were tough to express in senten...

...>> whether this is just an indication that the underlying data structure is >>>> *wrong*. The idea of "maybe" and "owning" going to gether, in any sense, >>>> seems flat out broken to me from a design perspective, and so I'm not >>>> enthused about providing abstractions that make it easier to build systems >>>> with unclear ownership semantics. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anton >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An H...

Dear Listers, I've been a big fan of R since graduate school. After working in the industry for years, I haven't had many opportunities to use R and am mainly using SAS. However, I am still forcing myself really hard to stay close to R by reading R-help and books and writing R code by myself for fun. But by and by, I start realizing I have hard time to keep up with R and am afraid that I

Hai, If i may suggest.. AD-DC, fine no changes needed. File server smb.conf, i made some changes, see below. I change the keytab and kerberos methode because your thinking that related to the problem. And i changed some settings below, which are moved from Global setting to Share setting. 3 settings where defined as (S) as in, its a "share" setting, so put it in the share

...change. > > The only change I made (which I did only to help with troubleshooting > via packet capture) was as follows: > OLD - smb encrypt = desired > NEW - smb encrypt = off > > So, while I'm happy that users aren't getting frustrated each > morning, I'm less enthused about not having encryption for W10 > clients. As mentioned earlier in this thread, this looks like a bug, > but I don't know whether it's with samba or with W10. Would you like > me to raise an issue in your bug tracker? > > Thanks for your support with this guys :) >...

Hello, I do not know whether this idea would be considered useful or not. Or easy to implement. But it is the case that on certain Linux distributions there are OS packages with precompiled R packages. However, install.packages (and related functions) download the source ones. Would it be possible to add an extra "repository" (or option) on install.packages that would direct R to

...ld realize that a mechanical > reformatting goes explicitly against current stated (and presumably > previously-agreed-upon) policy. > > -David Right, but my impression is that people who lived through the last update to the spelling conventions are less enthused about a slow transition, this time around, and that bit of the convention would necessarily also be up for revision. --paulr

Hi, I have question again about modifiers for pattern parameters. Vedant suggested such way. > CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: one_or_more(x): x {{+}} But I have some doubts. This should be equal to x+. This approach differs from standard one. In FileCheck I can write CHECK: {{x|y}}{{something}} This line will be equal to regex (x|y)(something). But if I use suggested approach and write same

I''m not a paid developer, but I still feel guilty. I thought it might be entertaining to have a little "programmer confession." So let''s hear an answer to this simple question: What makes you guilty about your Rails development? Mine is a bad one: I don''t write tests. I understand that TDD makes sense, but I just don''t do it. I''ve