search for: enshrinement

> >>>>> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> writes: > > PD> "Venables, Bill (CMIS, Cleveland)" <Bill.Venables at cmis.CSIRO.AU> > PD> writes: > >> The fact that every elementary book on statistics does it this way > >> does not make it correct. To be helpful, a histogram really

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> >

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: >> We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap >> seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? > > Apparently Red Hat is well aware of the upcoming leap second:

Second test after big upgrade.. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services

...n at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... > > They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance on April 1 deserved fortune enshrinement. It reminded me of one of my favorite articles: "P-Values are Random Variables". Unfortunately a legal copy of that paper is still behind a corporate firewall for which you would need to fork over USD 50.00, but a google search for "P-Values are Random Variables The American Statis...

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:25 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Looking at build-procedure files for link-order hints is technically > "written down" but not really human-friendly and not at all what I had in > mind. J > > I get that writing it down on a doc page will have the usual bit-rot > problems, but if you want to tell developers

...m> wrote: >> >> On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >>> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... >> They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? > Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance on April 1 deserved fortune enshrinement. It reminded me of one of my favorite articles: "P-Values are Random Variables". > > Unfortunately a legal copy of that paper is still behind a corporate firewall for which you would need to fork over USD 50.00, but a google search for "P-Values are Random Variables The America...

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > >> > period. Therefore that

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.

Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case. Unfortunately that hack got uprooted in commit

I wanted to present some of the particular reasons why I'm pretty strongly opposed to a purely flat layout of projects the way the current github 'llvm-project' repository looks, as that hasn't happened on the list yet. I'm replying to myself as I don't see a much better place to hang that conversation. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at

On 11/10/2015 05:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote: >> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> >> >> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >> period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in >> >> commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Bill Kelly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: >> On 13 October 2015 at 17:16, Kuperstein, Michael M via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> The FreeBSD CoC is, IMHO, much better in this respect ( https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html ).

On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> > Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 > > drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >> > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in >> > >> > commit

On 01/16/2015 07:05 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:43 AM, G Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: >>> We have another leap second coming. Have past bugs with Centos and leap >>> seconds (specifically high CPU spikes) been resolved? Should we be worried? >>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at reaching-clients.com> wrote: > > Fascinating - describes what's happening but no mention of how we can rest > assured that all will be well.... > As I ponder it, I recognise that most of our systems are constantly > calculating date/time values based upon the epoch - the number of seconds > since a particular

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at

When we are at it, the one with the title "[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Use drm_vblank_on/off consistently" from Daniel, which has a reviewed and tested by me also never made it into nouveau. Maybe pick that up as well? -mario On 12/01/2015 04:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter