search for: ensambl

...nes sobre las redes neuronales ( y el deep learning) pero no consigo entender el tipo de operaciones que se hacen en cada una de las capas de las redes neuronales. Necesito alguna explicacion más para tontos. ¿Alguien entiende bien lo que hace una red neuronal? Por ejemplo, un randomForest hace el ensamble por boostrap de árbole sde clasificación. Un SVM crea hiperplanos separando zonas, y una red neuronal hace "operaciones" en las capas, y les va asignando pesos, ¿pero uqe transformaciones? Gracias!!! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 9 Sep 2007 at 23:11, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > To me, Vorbis comments are insufficient. Ask anyone playing in an ensamble > if they would like recognition. Ask the record label holding the rights to > a song. Ask the music geek that wants his music collection sorted by > something other than artist, album, or release year. They would all prefer > this to Vorbis comments. FWIW, I find them sufficient....

Hi Daniel,, > I really have to ask you: Have you even tried to describe media using the > excising solutions? I don't mean adding subtitles and editing stuff. I mean > really say what a Ogg file contins. There is no working wheels for this. > Vorbis comments--used in FLAC too--can describe content with a very limited > field names (and badly enforced standards). I have and I

On Monday 10. September 2007 00:00:43 David K. Gasaway wrote: > On 9 Sep 2007 at 23:11, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > > To me, Vorbis comments are insufficient. Ask anyone playing in an > > ensamble if they would like recognition. Ask the record label holding > > the rights to a song. Ask the music geek that wants his music > > collection sorted by something other than artist, album, or release > > year. They would all prefer this to Vorbis comments. > > FWIW, I find t...

...t;person role="vocal instrument" uri="http://person.no/" > > xml:lang="nb-NO">Person Peopleson</person> > > So we're looking at replacing vorbiscomment with a xml version? Yes. To me, Vorbis comments are insufficient. Ask anyone playing in an ensamble if they would like recognition. Ask the record label holding the rights to a song. Ask the music geek that wants his music collection sorted by something other than artist, album, or release year. They would all prefer this to Vorbis comments. > How ?intensively have you looked at improvin...

...scomment for what you're after is a good thing. It supports your argument. Otherwise you are just waving your hands in the air saying everything that exists is bad and needs to be replace, but not explaining why it is bad. > To me, Vorbis comments are insufficient. Ask anyone playing in an ensamble > if they would like recognition. Ask the record label holding the rights to > a song. Ask the music geek that wants his music collection sorted by > something other than artist, album, or release year. Agreed. > They would all prefer this to Vorbis comments. Not agreed - "this...

...everything that exists is bad and needs > to be replace, but not explaining why it is bad. I did not think it would be necessary, but sure. Here is what you get with Vorbis comments: Artist=Person Peopleson > > To me, Vorbis comments are insufficient. Ask anyone playing in an > > ensamble if they would like recognition. Ask the record label holding > > the rights to a song. Ask the music geek that wants his music > > collection sorted by something other than artist, album, or release > > year. > > Agreed. > > > They would all prefer this to Vorbis c...

Daniel, these are all good ideas and worth progressing. However, it may be better not to merge too many goals in one format (MPEG-7 did that and ended up as a big mess). So, I suggest to start by structuring the types of things you want - then finding out which parts belong where into existing formats such as vorbis comment, Skeleton and CMML, and only then start to develop a new format. For