search for: ens3nsby

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...eneral, userspace apps only care about the > >> name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > >> as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > >> other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > >> "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > >> name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > >> > >> Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > >> there might be admin script or manageme...

...ll be done on master >interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the >name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long >as admin users can see reliable names that may carry >other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that >"ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a >name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > >Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because >there might be admin script or management software that is already >relying...

...al, userspace apps only care about the > > > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > > > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > > > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > > > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > > > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > > > > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > > > there might be admin script or man...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...ll be done on master >interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the >name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long >as admin users can see reliable names that may carry >other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that >"ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a >name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > >Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because >there might be admin script or management software that is already >relying...

...done on master > interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the > name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > > Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > there might be admin script or management software that is already > re...

...> interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the >> name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long >> as admin users can see reliable names that may carry >> other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that >> "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a >> name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. >> >> Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because >> there might be admin script or management software that is...

...space apps only care about the >>>> name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long >>>> as admin users can see reliable names that may carry >>>> other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that >>>> "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a >>>> name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. >>>> >>>> Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because >>>> there might be admin script...

...eneral, userspace apps only care about the > >> name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long > >> as admin users can see reliable names that may carry > >> other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that > >> "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a > >> name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to. > >> > >> Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because > >> there might be admin script or managem...