search for: ens160

I have a couple of CentOS 7 machines running in a vmware environment. On all the older ones I've deployed, the NIC is named ens160, but on all of the new ones, it is named ens192. I can't find any difference in the hardware that would account for this. Any suggestions on what I can do to figure out why some are named ens160 and some ens192? Thanks.

I've read the documentation that domain trusts should be fully supported with both Kerberos and NTLM authentication. I've created a new 2016 domain on a Windows box and created a Samba domain on a Linux box with a BIND9_DLZ backend. Both servers can resolve both DNS domains forwards and backwards and I am able to connect a Windows 10 client to the Samba domain without any issues. The

...:36 myserver httpd[686]: no listening sockets available, shutting down d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver httpd[686]: AH00015: Unable to open logs d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver systemd[1]: httpd.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver kernel: vmxnet3 0000:03:00.0 ens160: intr type 3, mode 0, 2 vectors allocated d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver kernel: vmxnet3 0000:03:00.0 ens160: NIC Link is Up 10000 Mbps d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver kill[924]: kill: cannot find process "" d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver systemd[1]: httpd.service: control process exited, code=exited...

Hi, I am running a Windows Domain based on 2 Samba AD servers. The setup is running mostly fine but I have the impression that the 2 DC's are not syncing their information. For instance: - I added a Windows pc to the domain last week, when I started 'Active directory users and computers' today on a windows pc I could not see that pc, after rebooting one of the DC's the pc

...anything. I did the following on CentOS *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* In another session on the same server: *nc syslog-server -u 514* tcpdump started to show me messages like: *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG, length: 172* After some research I disabled TCO (ethtool -K ens160 tx off rx off), now tcpdump shows: *[udp sum ok] [|syslog]* And I'm also receiving the logs. Yay! I have the same issue on multiple servers with CentOS versions 7.3.1611, 7.4.1708 & 7.5.1804. I'm having the issue no matter if it is a physical or virtual server (they also use different...

On 26/06/2019 11:32, Praveen Ghimire wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I have tried putting the whole rev-domain name. The following is the dhcpd.conf zone definition > > subnet 192.168.14.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { > authoritative; > ddns-update-style standard; > option netbios-name-servers 192.168.14.10; #14.10 is the AD box > option

...]: no listening sockets available, > shutting down > d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver httpd[686]: AH00015: Unable to open logs > d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver systemd[1]: httpd.service: main process exited, > code=exited, status=1/FAILURE > d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver kernel: vmxnet3 0000:03:00.0 ens160: intr type > 3, mode 0, 2 vectors allocated > d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver kernel: vmxnet3 0000:03:00.0 ens160: NIC Link is > Up 10000 Mbps > d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver kill[924]: kill: cannot find process "" > d?c. 17 10:21:36 myserver systemd[1]: httpd.service: control proces...

...ile="/usr/sbin/dhcpd" name="/usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh" pid=2557 comm="dhcp-dyndns.sh" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=112 ouid=0 Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: DHCPRELEASE of 192.168.14.198 from 00:50:56:9b:37:9b (WIN7VM01) via ens160 (found) Jun 27 10:55:07 server5-ad dhcpd[2525]: Removed reverse map on 198.14.168.192.in-addr.arpa. Jun 27 10:55:09 server5-ad named[1097]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone lin.group Jun 27 10:55:09 server5-ad named[1097]: client @0x7efc58052610 192.168.14.198#50682: update 'lin.group/IN...

...ve to add your heartbeat IPs HeartbeatIPofNode1 HeartbeatIPofNode2 HeartbeatIPofNode3 HeartbeatIPofNodeN # EXAMPLE: | 192.168.2.111 | 192.168.2.112 ## IN /etc/ctdb/public_addresses FirstPublicIP/CIDR INTERFACE SecondPublicIP/CIDR INTERFACE ThirdPublicIP/CIDR INTERFACE # EXAMPLE: | 192.168.1.111/30 ens160 | 192.168.1.112/30 ens160 I hope this will help you getting your cluster to work. Regards Sascha Brutscher | Hello, | | from SAMBA 4.9/4.10 there was a big change regarding CTDB. Does anyone | have an example configuration, how to configure a CTDB cluster from | version 4.10? | | Is there someo...

...</ssl-certificate> ... So, there you have it. The only anomaly with the set up was that when the VMWare instance of the site started it was running dhcp and I struggled to wrestle control away from it. And I was never able to get eth0 to work so I used same interface name that dhcp used 'ens160'. Any and all suggestions, recommendation, ideas, and solutions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, --John John Zernick | Senior Systems Administrator (Web)| D: (216) 916-6472 | F: (216) 916-6473<http://www.ideastream.org> Idea Center | 1375 Euclid | Cleveland OH 44115 [ide...

...unning an unknown distribution x86_64 ----------- running command : ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host 2: ens160: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:50:56:9c:25:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.27.2.56/22 brd 172.27.3.255 scope global noprefixroute ens160 inet6 fe80::bbc2:13a4:154:7fb8/64 scope link noprefixroute ----------...

...1 day 5h ago Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) d?c. 21 12:49:35 (failing) systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Bring up/down networking... d?c. 21 12:49:26 (failing) network[747]: Activation de l'interface loopback : [ OK ] d?c. 21 12:49:28 (failing) network[747]: Activation de l'interface ens160 : [ OK ] d?c. 21 12:49:31 (failing) network[747]: Activation de l'interface ens192 : [ OK ] d?c. 21 12:49:31 (failing) systemd[1]: Started LSB: Bring up/down networking. (correct) # systemctl list-units|grep network network.service...

Hello James, > Well it looks like you are using the network service rather than the > recommended NetworkManager ... Yes. That's the way our security experts made the models I use to setup my servers. I'll test a migration to NetworkManager, and take their advice on it. > > The network service is not blocking the flow so it executes and systemd > carries on ... >

...gt; ----------- > running command : ip a > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN > group default qlen 1000 > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > inet6 ::1/128 scope host > 2: ens160: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state > UP group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:50:56:9c:25:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 172.27.2.56/22 brd 172.27.3.255 scope global noprefixroute > ens160 > inet6 fe80::bbc2:13a4:154:7fb8/64 scope link...

On 28/11/2019 20:26, S?rgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 20:09 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 28/11/2019 20:01, S?rgio Basto wrote: >>> This recommendation , why ? wiki say to add it [1] >>> [1] >>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Enable_Extended_ACL_Support_in_the_smb.conf_File >> Yes, but under

...> *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* > > In another session on the same server: > *nc syslog-server -u 514* > > tcpdump started to show me messages like: > *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG, length: 172* > > After some research I disabled TCO (ethtool -K ens160 tx off rx off), now > tcpdump shows: > *[udp sum ok] [|syslog]* > And I'm also receiving the logs. Yay! > > I have the same issue on multiple servers with CentOS versions 7.3.1611, > 7.4.1708 & 7.5.1804. I'm having the issue no matter if it is a physical or > virtua...

...> *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* > > In another session on the same server: > *nc syslog-server -u 514* > > tcpdump started to show me messages like: > *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG, length: 172* > > After some research I disabled TCO (ethtool -K ens160 tx off rx off), now > tcpdump shows: > *[udp sum ok] [|syslog]* > And I'm also receiving the logs. Yay! > > I have the same issue on multiple servers with CentOS versions 7.3.1611, > 7.4.1708 & 7.5.1804. I'm having the issue no matter if it is a physical or > virtua...

...> *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* > > In another session on the same server: > *nc syslog-server -u 514* > > tcpdump started to show me messages like: > *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG, length: 172* > > After some research I disabled TCO (ethtool -K ens160 tx off rx off), now > tcpdump shows: > *[udp sum ok] [|syslog]* > And I'm also receiving the logs. Yay! > > I have the same issue on multiple servers with CentOS versions 7.3.1611, > 7.4.1708 & 7.5.1804. I'm having the issue no matter if it is a physical or > virtua...

...anything. I did the following on CentOS *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514* In another session on the same server: *nc syslog-server -u 514* tcpdump started to show me messages like: *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG, length: 172* After some research I disabled TCO (ethtool -K ens160 tx off rx off), now tcpdump shows: *[udp sum ok] [|syslog]* And I'm also receiving the logs. Yay! I have the same issue on multiple servers with CentOS versions 7.3.1611, 7.4.1708 & 7.5.1804. I'm having the issue no matter if it is a physical or virtual server (they also use different...

...b.conf to: [global] workgroup = sambadc realm = SAMBADC.LCL netbios name = samba-dc server string = SAMBA DC server role = active directory domain controller server services = -dns ldap server require strong auth = no idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes interfaces = lo,ens160 bind interfaces only = yes log level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log max log size = 100000 include = /etc/samba/shares.conf [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/sambadc.lcl/scripts read only = no [sysvol] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol read only = no...