search for: enrty

I have one field on a from where a number will be entered called "amount". I need to compare this to an existing field in the database also named "amount" to make sure it is a higher number. I also have to find this specific record by comparing it''s "post_id" field with @session[:post].id Any help here would be greatly appreciated. -- Posted via

...conf (do we need them for static IP?). After about 15-20 seconds, again 2-way converstaion is established again. IAX trunk, SIP extension, no NAT. 3. Conversation goes one way for 15-20 sec during the most important part of the conversation (Murphy's Law). You are on a static IP with no dyndns enrty. Trunk is ZAP on PRI, extensions SIP. NAT present but router properly configures for port forwarding. externip and localnet settings present in sip.conf Is think may be due to some reason RTP stream gets lost, routed to wrong IP. But why would this happen during a call and how to stop it from happ...

...pe page (similar in function to basecamp''s) where I can show the last 5 updated items from my 3 differing models, then grouped together by project. Solution ideas: (1) Is it best to create a log model where everytime I add or update another model (like messages, comments, lists etc) an enrty gets added to the log along with the project. I can see this being an overkill and the duplication of data is not correct. (2) In my controller perform a query that searches every model for every item against a given project_id. The order the results by "updated_on". Then select the...

is there anybody who can tell me how to forward request to other host, i would like to forward all dns requests to other dns server and it must be done with packet forwarding because dns server (resolver) must go down. There is many docs about port forwarding based on nat table and explanation consider linux box act like nat with two e cards. thanks, alens

...in 2-way converstaion is > established again. > > IAX trunk, SIP extension, no NAT. > > > > 3. Conversation goes one way for 15-20 sec during the most > important > > part of the conversation (Murphy's Law). You are on a > static IP with > > no dyndns enrty. Trunk is ZAP on PRI, extensions SIP. NAT > present but > > router properly configures for port forwarding. externip > and localnet > > settings present in sip.conf > > > > Is think may be due to some reason RTP stream gets lost, > routed to wrong IP. > >...

A couple of days ago I posted a problem I was having with the smbapasswd command for users (not root). Here is the original post: I have Samba installed on a HP-UX 11.00 system using NIS for UID/password resolution. The smbpasswd file hasbeen initilized and as root I can add a user's password and the user can "attach" the "share". But when the user tries to do the

.../wake code for the pv version. The actual MCS queue can use extra storage in the mcs_nodes[] array to keep track of state and therefore uses directed wakeups. The head contender has no such storage available and reverts to the per-cpu lock entry similar to the current kvm code. We can do a single enrty because any nesting will wake the vcpu and cause the lower loop to retry. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz at infradead.org> --- include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 3 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 69 +++++++++++++- kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 177 ++...

.../wake code for the pv version. The actual MCS queue can use extra storage in the mcs_nodes[] array to keep track of state and therefore uses directed wakeups. The head contender has no such storage available and reverts to the per-cpu lock entry similar to the current kvm code. We can do a single enrty because any nesting will wake the vcpu and cause the lower loop to retry. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz at infradead.org> --- include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 3 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 69 +++++++++++++- kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 177 ++...

...t; > The actual MCS queue can use extra storage in the mcs_nodes[] array to > keep track of state and therefore uses directed wakeups. > > The head contender has no such storage available and reverts to the > per-cpu lock entry similar to the current kvm code. We can do a single > enrty because any nesting will wake the vcpu and cause the lower loop > to retry. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)<peterz at infradead.org> > --- > include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 3 > kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 69 +++++++++++++- > kernel/loc...

...t; > The actual MCS queue can use extra storage in the mcs_nodes[] array to > keep track of state and therefore uses directed wakeups. > > The head contender has no such storage available and reverts to the > per-cpu lock entry similar to the current kvm code. We can do a single > enrty because any nesting will wake the vcpu and cause the lower loop > to retry. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)<peterz at infradead.org> > --- > include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 3 > kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 69 +++++++++++++- > kernel/loc...

Hi Waiman, As promised; here is the paravirt stuff I did during the trip to BOS last week. All the !paravirt patches are more or less the same as before (the only real change is the copyright lines in the first patch). The paravirt stuff is 'simple' and KVM only -- the Xen code was a little more convoluted and I've no real way to test that but it should be stright fwd to make work.

Hi Waiman, As promised; here is the paravirt stuff I did during the trip to BOS last week. All the !paravirt patches are more or less the same as before (the only real change is the copyright lines in the first patch). The paravirt stuff is 'simple' and KVM only -- the Xen code was a little more convoluted and I've no real way to test that but it should be stright fwd to make work.

...d one full entry in the ldap withsmbpasswd -a -m <machine_name>$ in the MS workstation, if is a XP or W2K you need set in the registry: SignOrSeal to "0" in the MS workstation you need join to the domain ASAP via:" blah blah... I interpret this as sayng that I need to add an enrty in both /etc/passwd and the LDAP server. This is absurd to me. If I'm using LDAP, that's the only place where it makes sense to me to add the machine account. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the reason of ou=Computers not working is because Samba needs to see the machine as users and, since nss_...