search for: enoprotoopt

...encounted two problems: One I easily hacked the sources (wrapped the offending lines with #ifdefs): ./../generic/tclPosixStr.c:347:5: error: duplicate case value case EPFNOSUPPORT: return "EPFNOSUPPORT"; ^ ./../generic/tclPosixStr.c:290:5: error: previously used here case ENOPROTOOPT: return "ENOPROTOOPT"; ^ ./../generic/tclPosixStr.c: In function 'Tcl_ErrnoMsg': ./../generic/tclPosixStr.c:795:5: error: duplicate case value case EPFNOSUPPORT: return "protocol family not supported"; ^ ./../generic/tclPosixStr.c:738:5: error: previously...

...SOCKET, SO_REUSEPORT).unpack(''i'')[0] - assert_equal 1, cur + assert sock.getsockopt(Socket::SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEPORT).bool end if defined?(SO_REUSEPORT) end The error I get when I test 4.7.0 on debian squeeze (in a VM): : 1) Error: : test_reuseport(TestSocketHelper): : Errno::ENOPROTOOPT: Protocol not available : /home/ahobson/git/unicorn/test/ruby-1.9.3/lib/unicorn/socket_helper.rb:183:in `setsockopt'' : /home/ahobson/git/unicorn/test/ruby-1.9.3/lib/unicorn/socket_helper.rb:183:in `new_tcp_server'' : /home/ahobson/git/unicorn/test/ruby-1.9.3/lib/unicorn/socket_help...

...le.c +++ b/src/lib/ostream-file.c @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void o_stream_tcp_flush_via_nodelay(struct file_ostream *fstream) { if (net_set_tcp_nodelay(fstream->fd, TRUE) < 0) { if (errno != ENOTSUP && errno != ENOTSOCK && - errno != ENOPROTOOPT) { + errno != ENOPROTOOPT && errno != EINVAL) { i_error("file_ostream.net_set_tcp_nodelay(%s, TRUE) failed: %m", o_stream_get_name(&fstream->ostream.ostream)); }

...ream-file.c > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void o_stream_tcp_flush_via_nodelay(struct file_ostream *fstream) > { > if (net_set_tcp_nodelay(fstream->fd, TRUE) < 0) { > if (errno != ENOTSUP && errno != ENOTSOCK && > - errno != ENOPROTOOPT) { > + errno != ENOPROTOOPT && errno != EINVAL) { > i_error("file_ostream.net_set_tcp_nodelay(%s, TRUE) failed: %m", > o_stream_get_name(&fstream->ostream.ostream)); > } I do...

...tic void hvs_set_min_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 val) -{ > - /* Ignored. */ > -} > - > -static void hvs_set_max_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 val) -{ > - /* Ignored. */ > -} > - > -static u64 hvs_get_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ > - return -ENOPROTOOPT; > -} > - > -static u64 hvs_get_min_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ > - return -ENOPROTOOPT; > -} > - > -static u64 hvs_get_max_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ > - return -ENOPROTOOPT; > -} > - > static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = { >...

...*vsk, u64 val) -{ - /* Ignored. */ -} - -static void hvs_set_min_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 val) -{ - /* Ignored. */ -} - -static void hvs_set_max_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 val) -{ - /* Ignored. */ -} - -static u64 hvs_get_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ - return -ENOPROTOOPT; -} - -static u64 hvs_get_min_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ - return -ENOPROTOOPT; -} - -static u64 hvs_get_max_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ - return -ENOPROTOOPT; -} - static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = { .get_local_cid = hvs_get_local_cid, @@ -906,12...

...*vsk, u64 val) -{ - /* Ignored. */ -} - -static void hvs_set_min_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 val) -{ - /* Ignored. */ -} - -static void hvs_set_max_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 val) -{ - /* Ignored. */ -} - -static u64 hvs_get_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ - return -ENOPROTOOPT; -} - -static u64 hvs_get_min_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ - return -ENOPROTOOPT; -} - -static u64 hvs_get_max_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk) -{ - return -ENOPROTOOPT; -} - static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = { .get_local_cid = hvs_get_local_cid, @@ -908,12...

dovecot-v1.0-alpha build failed for Solaris 11 (OpenSolaris Nevada). The problematic line is in socket.c line 228. The fix should be to change SOL_TCP to IPPROTO_TCP found in netinet/in.h. This change should work universally on all platforms. Gary

Hi, I've a problem with rsync 2.6.2 and the daemon. I've installed it precisly as I did with 2.6.0 (I've tried before with 2.6.1 and was having the same problems as now with 2.6.2). When I try to a rsync --daemon command the rsync offcourse finishes, but in the log file it says 2004/05/04 21:15:10 [22369] rsyncd version 2.6.2 starting, listening on port 873 2004/05/04 21:15:10

...c struct o2hb_callback_func o2net_hb_up, o2net_hb_down; #define O2NET_HB_PRI 0x1 -static struct o2net_handshake *o2net_hand; -static struct o2net_msg *o2net_keep_req, *o2net_keep_resp; - static int o2net_sys_err_translations[O2NET_ERR_MAX] = {[O2NET_ERR_NONE] = 0, [O2NET_ERR_NO_HNDLR] = -ENOPROTOOPT, @@ -930,19 +927,22 @@ static int o2net_send_tcp_msg(struct socket *sock, struct kvec *vec, } static void o2net_sendpage(struct o2net_sock_container *sc, - void *kmalloced_virt, - size_t size) + void *virt, size_t size) { struct o2net_node *nn = o2net_nn_from_num(sc->sc_nod...

...c struct o2hb_callback_func o2net_hb_up, o2net_hb_down; #define O2NET_HB_PRI 0x1 -static struct o2net_handshake *o2net_hand; -static struct o2net_msg *o2net_keep_req, *o2net_keep_resp; - static int o2net_sys_err_translations[O2NET_ERR_MAX] = {[O2NET_ERR_NONE] = 0, [O2NET_ERR_NO_HNDLR] = -ENOPROTOOPT, @@ -930,19 +927,22 @@ static int o2net_send_tcp_msg(struct socket *sock, struct kvec *vec, } static void o2net_sendpage(struct o2net_sock_container *sc, - void *kmalloced_virt, - size_t size) + void *virt, size_t size) { struct o2net_node *nn = o2net_nn_from_num(sc->sc_nod...

...c struct o2hb_callback_func o2net_hb_up, o2net_hb_down; #define O2NET_HB_PRI 0x1 -static struct o2net_handshake *o2net_hand; -static struct o2net_msg *o2net_keep_req, *o2net_keep_resp; - static int o2net_sys_err_translations[O2NET_ERR_MAX] = {[O2NET_ERR_NONE] = 0, [O2NET_ERR_NO_HNDLR] = -ENOPROTOOPT, @@ -930,19 +927,22 @@ static int o2net_send_tcp_msg(struct socket *sock, struct kvec *vec, } static void o2net_sendpage(struct o2net_sock_container *sc, - void *kmalloced_virt, - size_t size) + void *virt, size_t size) { struct o2net_node *nn = o2net_nn_from_num(sc->sc_nod...

...c struct o2hb_callback_func o2net_hb_up, o2net_hb_down; #define O2NET_HB_PRI 0x1 -static struct o2net_handshake *o2net_hand; -static struct o2net_msg *o2net_keep_req, *o2net_keep_resp; - static int o2net_sys_err_translations[O2NET_ERR_MAX] = {[O2NET_ERR_NONE] = 0, [O2NET_ERR_NO_HNDLR] = -ENOPROTOOPT, @@ -930,19 +927,22 @@ static int o2net_send_tcp_msg(struct socket *sock, struct kvec *vec, } static void o2net_sendpage(struct o2net_sock_container *sc, - void *kmalloced_virt, - size_t size) + void *virt, size_t size) { struct o2net_node *nn = o2net_nn_from_num(sc->sc_nod...

Hi! We are pleased to release Dovecot release v2.3.7. Tarball is available at https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.7.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.7.tar.gz.sig Binary packages are available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes ------- * fts-solr: Removed break-imap-search parameter + Added more events for the new statistics, see ?

Hi! We are pleased to release Dovecot release v2.3.7. Tarball is available at https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.7.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.7.tar.gz.sig Binary packages are available at https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes ------- * fts-solr: Removed break-imap-search parameter + Added more events for the new statistics, see ?

...0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:550: error: ‘ENOMSG’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:552: error: ‘ENOMSG’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:553: error: ‘ENOPROTOOPT’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:554: error: ‘ENOSPC’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:558: error: ‘ENOMEM’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/ll...

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using