Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "enocoding".
Did you mean:
encoding
2003 Apr 03
1
OGG in RIFF-WAVE (encoding with MSACM)
So i'm trying to write an app that enocodes WAV files to "Ogg in a RIFF-WAV"
files. Theese are used in Fruity Loops, and since the software itself does
not have
this feature i wanted to write one myself. The point for it is to save space
when
sharing "zipped loop packages". Such packages contain the samples (WAV) and
the song
file (FLP). At first i wrote just an encoder
2003 Apr 17
1
Re: Please confirm your message
Hi vorbis!
Ezt írtad Wednesday, April 16, 2003, 4:22:39 PM perckor:
vxo> Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org.
vxo> We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of
vxo> "Re: [vorbis] Re: OGG in RIFF-WAVE (encoding with MSACM)".
vxo> Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your
vxo> mailer's
2019 May 10
1
players who cannot handle switching to a fallback mount point?
Hello. I have same problem, and I think that it's because AAC+ uses VBR and
when it's changes, is not the same bitrate, because varies...
El jue., 9 may. 2019 a las 21:29, Michel van Dop (<mvandop at xs4all.nl>)
escribió:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for the information. I already try a player to discover the
> stream type of both streams if the are the same.
> But i can
2018 Nov 26
4
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> There has been a TODO waiting for quite a long time in
> drm_dp_mst_topology.c:
>
> /* We cannot rely on port->vcpi.num_slots to update
> * topology_state->avail_slots as the port may not exist if the parent
> * branch device was unplugged. This should be fixed by tracking
> * per-port slot allocation
2018 Nov 29
1
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 09:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:44:14PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 20:44 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > We could do this the other way around so it looks like this maybe
> >
> > struct kref; /* manages kfree() */
> > struct topology_kref; /* corresonds to lifetime in topology
2018 Nov 28
3
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 20:44 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:48:59PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:04:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > > There has been a TODO waiting
2018 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:04:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > There has been a TODO waiting for quite a long time in
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology.c:
> > >
> > > /* We cannot rely on port->vcpi.num_slots to update
> >
2018 Nov 26
0
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 22:04 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > There has been a TODO waiting for quite a long time in
> > drm_dp_mst_topology.c:
> >
> > /* We cannot rely on port->vcpi.num_slots to update
> > * topology_state->avail_slots as the port may not exist if the parent
> > *
2018 Nov 26
0
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:04:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > There has been a TODO waiting for quite a long time in
> > drm_dp_mst_topology.c:
> >
> > /* We cannot rely on port->vcpi.num_slots to update
> > * topology_state->avail_slots as the port may not exist if the parent
> >
2018 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:48:59PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:04:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > There has been a TODO waiting for quite a long time in
> > > > drm_dp_mst_topology.c:
> >
2018 Nov 28
0
[PATCH v6 3/6] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:44:14PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 20:44 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:48:59PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:04:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at
2018 Nov 16
8
[PATCH v6 0/6] drm/dp_mst: Improve VCPI helpers, use in nouveau
This patchset does some cleaning up of the atomic VCPI helpers for MST,
and converts nouveau over to using them. I would have included amdgpu in
this patch as well, but at the moment moving them over to the atomic
helpers is nontrivial.
[sorry for still not adding your R-Bs! I ended up needing to make a
lot of changes to make it so we do actually kref() each port in the
atomic state]
Cc: Daniel