search for: enmerated

Hi, Is there any setting in smb.conf that prevents the AD enumeration like user, group or computer enumeration? We tried to follow different methods recommended by Microsoft for the AD. But they don't seem to work. Still using apps like powershell, we can still enumerate the users, groups etc. Best regards, Anantha Raghava

...ry. Perhaps > you are thinking of libsmbclient ? this can be used by other packages to > provide network browsing. > > You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch for > Samba. I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. We get: smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH I think this is some sort of Mac problem(?) Thanks for everyone's time. Unless you ha...

...his can be used by other packages to >>> provide network browsing. >>> >>> You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch for >>> Samba. >> >> I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't >> enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. >> >> We get: >> smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] >> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH >> >> I think this is some sort of Mac problem(...

...his can be used by other packages to >>> provide network browsing. >>> >>> You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch for >>> Samba. >> >> I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't >> enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. >> >> We get: >> smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] >> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH > > This error is generated by the smbcient librarie...

...his can be used by other packages to >>> provide network browsing. >>> >>> You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch for >>> Samba. >> >> I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't >> enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. >> >> We get: >> smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] >> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH >> >> I think this is some sort of Mac problem(...

...ng of libsmbclient ? this can be used by other packages to > > provide network browsing. > > > > You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch for > > Samba. > > I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't > enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. > > We get: > smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] > Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH > > I think this is some sort of Mac problem(?) Thanks for everyon...

...ng of libsmbclient ? this can be used by other packages to > > provide network browsing. > > > > You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch for > > Samba. > > I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem. The problem is we can't > enmerated shares exposed from MacOS. But our Windows and MacOS clients can. > > We get: > smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] > Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH This error is generated by the smbcient libraries trying to send an SMB1...

...gt;> provide network browsing. >>>> >>>> You could always code up what you require and propose it as a patch >>>> for >>>> Samba. >>> >>> I think this isn't (exactly) a Samba problem.? The problem is we can't >>> enmerated shares exposed from MacOS.? But our Windows and MacOS >>> clients can. >>> >>> We get: >>> smb1cli_req_writev_submit: called for dialect[SMB3_00] server[mac_svr2] >>> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_REVISION_MISMATCH >>> >>> I t...

On 9/27/19 1:11 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 18:57, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 12:48 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 27/09/2019 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> I understand the "Function Discovery" side and wsdd (which is fine >>>> for local same network discovery