search for: enhed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 35 matches for "enhed".

Did you mean: ended
2015 Sep 24
4
Meet at MTV to discuss TSAN/android/aarch64?
Hi everyone. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to meet yesterday. I think it was very productive! I am writing to keep a "minutes" of the meet, as I remember them. Action Items: - Jasonk: split up bionic patch to explicitly replace CPP macros with actual calls, one file at a time. - Google/Android: pthread_barrier interface in bionic - *Enh*: 1 paragraph to explain
2008 Oct 30
1
Enh-Req: Mark As Read When Delivered
I'm under the impression bug-reports are supposed to go to the list, so hopefully it's okay if I put in a feature request here too (assuming it's not already implemented; but it doesn't look like it). Basically, all I would like to do is be able to sometimes deliver mail as already mail into mail boxes. Is there some way to do this? If not, could a flag perhaps be added to
1999 Jun 02
0
Compiling SAMBA on DEC UNIX 4.0 W/OUT ENH SEC?
Hello! I am wondering if anyone has compiled Samba on DEC UNIX 4.0 withOUT the OSF1_ENH_SEC stuff? I don't want to use enhanced security, but I can't seem to get away from it. I didn't see any configure options, so I have been editing the source files to remove constants like OSF1_ENH_SEC and HAVE_GETPRPWNAM (among others). Has anyone had any luck with trying to do this? Thanks!
2003 Apr 30
2
[ENH] Clarify rsync flavors (PR#2886)
The 1.7.0 (2003-04-16) "R Installation and Adminsistration" manual mentions various flavors of R available from rsync (section 1.2, p. 1). These are also referred to in various other sources on and offline (e.g., the FAQ). The meaning of r-release vs r-patched was not entirely clear to me. How is the patched version patched? Should it just have bug fixes, and so likely be more
2007 Nov 02
1
[Patch, enh] Permit host and IP addresses in (Allow|Deny)Groups
Hi, I ran across a case in which my server maintenance was simplified by using SSHD configuration options like this in sshd_config: AllowGroups admin at 192.168.0.* sshuser in much the same fashion as (Allow|Deny)Users. In this case, the goal is to provide access to administrators only from the local network, while allowing SSH users to login from anywhere. This (IMHO) simplifies access
2008 May 06
1
Wine 1.00 the AppDB and State of the Winehq website.
In looking forward to the release of wine 1.0 I have a question about "Browse Applications by Rating" http://appdb.winehq.org/browse_by_rating.php When adding test data you can only add reports on what looks like the last 6 releases? Eg wine versions 0.956 / 0.957 /0.958 /0.959 /0.960 /0.961 Do these stat's on "Browse Applications by Rating" report this? If not what does
2013 May 09
1
Moving from Speex to Opus (question 2)
Hello! I was using Speex all the time, and I am now moving to Opus. I had encapsulated the decoder a bit, I had the following cpp file: #include "StdAfx.h" #include "spxcodec.h" #define MAX_FRAME_SIZE 2000 #define MAX_FRAME_BYTES 2000 CSpxCodec::CSpxCodec() : enh(1), rate(8000) { } CSpxCodec::~CSpxCodec() { } void CSpxCodec::Init() { speex_bits_init(&bits);
2008 Apr 04
0
speexdec 1.2.3
Dear Jean-Marc and Peter: Thank you both very much for your time and advice. I did not realize that Lame MP3 code has a -r option (without reading its code). I have tried the suggested command lines verbatim with the added -r option, along with other combination of option settings. I could not figure out how to eliminate the distortion in the result, like voice turning either high or low
2008 Apr 04
2
speexdec 1.2.3
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > Jahn, Ray (R.) a ?crit : > > > Dear Speex codec community: > > > > I am working on conversion of voice files. I could not figure out how to use speexdec.exe 1.2.3 in piped mode in order to avoid the creation of the potentially large intermediate *.wav or *.pcm files. Any
2007 Feb 15
2
simpleR or usingR package by Verzani
...stions? Thank you!! ______________________________________________________ Danmarks Fiskeriundersøgelser er den 1.1.07 fusioneret med Danmarks Tekniske Universitet (DTU), Forskningscenter Risø, Danmarks Fødevareforskning, Danmarks Rumcenter og Danmarks Transportforskning. DTU er den fortsættende enhed. Læs mere om fusionen på www.detnyedtu.dk As of 1 January 2007 The Danish Institute for Fisheries Research has merged with the Technical University of Denmark, Risø National Laboratory, the Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, the Danish National Space Centre and the Danish Transport...
2010 Jul 20
2
[SPAM] [BombData][alltestmode] Re: Speex Echo Cancellation
As for me - speex_echo_cancellation is a better choise. Try using it in capture thread instead of those speex_echo_capture and speex_echo_playback functions. And please, describe your problem in details. Cause the fact that you "didn get echo cancellation" doesn't mean you are doing smth wrong. Regards, Anton A. Shpakovsky -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at
2007 Apr 11
0
Problem with speex
Hello! I am downloaded last version of speex library and did compile DLL. But I am have not good sound : Please see my code (Delphi) and say me please WHat I am do not right. Or please send me correct compiled DLL and example of correct using SPEEX_MODEID_WB and SPEEX_MODEID_UWB , denoise, and other effects. How I can set MONO mode in decode? My Code: smpRt:=32000; n:=10; encbits:
2010 Jul 20
0
[SPAM] [BombData][alltestmode] Re: Speex Echo Cancellation
Anton A. Shpakovsky <saa <at> tomsksoft.com> writes: > > As for me - speex_echo_cancellation is a better choise. Try using it in > capture thread instead > of those speex_echo_capture and speex_echo_playback functions. > > And please, describe your problem in details. Cause the fact that you > "didn get echo cancellation" > doesn't mean you are
2010 Sep 04
0
How to generate integers from uniform distribution with
On 04-Sep-10 19:27:54, Yi wrote: > Enh, I see. > It totally makes sense. > Thank you for your perfect explanation. > Enjoy the long weekend~ > Yi You're welcome! Earlier I tried an experiment with rejection sampling, which seems to work well for the case where you want mean of the sampled values to exactly be the mean of the range being sampled from. The number of tries, even
2005 Oct 09
0
Fw: problem in encoder/decoder
-------Original Message------- From: Eid Date: 10/09/05 14:07:44 To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: problem in encoder/decoder hi all, I'm developing an app to broadcast voice over web. i tried to use speex and download ver 1.04 documentation and use it to develop encoding and decoding but after decoding voice is damaged i attach my encode/decode function. BOOL
2007 Aug 24
0
speex DTX chore
hi there, I am new to mailing list so excuse me if I don't obey to the 'netiquette'. i am writing voice chat and speex is in the root of it. i write it in Java and use JNI to link with 'C'-based Speex 1.2beta. [I know of JSpeex but there are not implemented some features] recently i decided to use DTX feature of speex as well. the code follows. The problem is that no matter
2010 Jul 20
1
[BombData][alltestmode] Re: [SPAM] [BombData][alltestmode] Re: Speex EchoCancellation
Well, I'm not a professional in AEC theory, but what I've mentioned is: speex_echo_state_init(20, 320*10) - frame size should correspond to 20ms. At your sampling rate (16000hz) is should be 16K*0.02 = 320. The same I can notice about echo tail. 100ms: 16000*0.3 = 4800, not 3200 as you has. But that's not crucial I think. Just wanna you get the point. "Internally,
2013 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Internal command line options should not be statically initialized.
>> I definitely agree with the desire to remove command line options and >> having them be initialized as part of the pass would be general >> goodness. However, a few possible issues: >> >> a) a number of command line options aren't really connected to passes >> per-se (backend options) > > We don’t have to ban the old-style options. They can live-on
2013 Sep 17
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Internal command line options should not be statically initialized.
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I definitely agree with the desire to remove command line options and > having them be initialized as part of the pass would be general > goodness. However, a few possible issues: > > a) a number of command line options aren't really connected to passes > per-se
2012 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] Enhance of asm macros
> For compability this problems requiring some compiler switch flag. Can you > give me description/example how it's can be done? grep for DwarfRequiresRelocationForSectionOffset. Something like that might do what you want. Cheers, Rafael