search for: engtools

...1) it can simply a compiler driver that does thread level parallelism; 2) or a tool that generates Makfiles which are fed into parallel make to explore single node parallelism; 3) or a tool that generates BUILD files that feed into distributed build system (such as Google's blaze: http://google-engtools.blogspot.com/2011/08/build-in-cloud-how-build-system-works.html) Another benefit is it will make compiler debugging easier. thanks, David On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail....

...er driver that does thread level parallelism; > 2) or a tool that generates Makfiles which are fed into parallel make > to explore single node parallelism; > 3) or a tool that generates BUILD files that feed into distributed > build system (such as Google's blaze: > http://google-engtools.blogspot.com/2011/08/build-in-cloud-how-build-system-works.html) > > Another benefit is it will make compiler debugging easier. > > thanks, > > David > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Sh...

...vel parallelism; >> 2) or a tool that generates Makfiles which are fed into parallel make >> to explore single node parallelism; >> 3) or a tool that generates BUILD files that feed into distributed >> build system (such as Google's blaze: >> >> http://google-engtools.blogspot.com/2011/08/build-in-cloud-how-build-system-works.html) >> >> Another benefit is it will make compiler debugging easier. >> >> thanks, >> >> David >> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >>...

On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > 3.2 Compile partitions independently > -------------------------------------- > > There are two camps: one camp advocate compiling partitions via multi-process, > the other one favor multi-thread. > > Inside Apple compiler teams, I'm the only one belong to the 1st comp. I think >

Hi, There: This is the proposal for parallelizing post-ipo stage. See the following for details. I also attach a toy-grade rudimentary implementation. This implementation can be used to illustrate some concepts here. This patch is not going to be committed. Unfortunately, this weekend I will be too busy to read emails. Please do not construe delayed response as being rude :-).