search for: enforement

> > That is a reasonable way to do it. Another reasonable way would be > > to lower them in the instruction selector itself though the use of > > custom expanders. In practice, using instructions with "call foo" > in > them instead of lowering to calls may be simpler. > > Hmm, let me see. Just to check that I understand your proposal > correctly:

Hi, >> My target supports only f64 at the moment. >> Question: How can I tell LLVM that float is the same as double on my >> target? May be by assigning the same register class to both MVT::f32 ?> and MVT::f64? >Just don't assign a register class for the f32 type. This is what the >X86 backend does when it is in "floating point stack mode". This will

Hi, I'm now ready to implement the FP support for my embedded target. My target supports only f64 at the moment. Question: How can I tell LLVM that float is the same as double on my target? May be by assigning the same register class to both MVT::f32 and MVT::f64? But FP is supported only in the emulated mode, because the target does not have any hardware support for FP. Therefore each FP

Hi, I was looking into the new Authentication Policy feature: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Policy I had kinda hoped that I would be able to enfore this in a proxy running in front of several backends. This proxy does not authenticate. It use "nopassword". But I realize that the "succes" reported in the final authpolicy req. (command=report) is not what is

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > I'm now ready to implement the FP support for my embedded target. cool. > My target supports only f64 at the moment. > Question: How can I tell LLVM that float is the same as double on my > target? May be by assigning the same register class to both MVT::f32 > and MVT::f64? Just don't assign a register class for the f32 type.

I'd like to run my own passes (implemented as .so) via the opt tool on a linked bitcode. >opt -load=my_own_pass.so -do_my_passes ... test.bc > test.output.bc However, my passes require other LLVM's passes before and after. For example, the ordering of passes that I want: (1) A couple of LLVM's passes ==> (2) my_loop_pass ==> (3) my_module_pass ==> (4) Other

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >>> such a call instruction? >> >> Why not just make the asm string be "call __fsub64"? > > Well, of course it would be the best solution. But the interesting part > is that I need to generate the machine code directly because for > different reasons use of a system assembler is not an option. As a ok. >

Hi, Is rails supposed to support referential integrity? That is rails either support to be able to ensure that when a new contact is created this can only happen if a valid suberb is associated with it, and which mechanisms of the below are supposed to do this? (a) using DB foreign key constraints information as a basis? (b) using the "has_one" line in the model file to enfore? If

Hi ... After the below thread, I wrote a patch to select on a node-by-node basis which auth-policy request should be done from that node. To my surprise the exact same functionality then turned up in 2.2.34 with just slightly different option names:* * *auth_policy_check_before_auth*: Whether to do policy lookup before authentication is started *auth_policy_check_after_auth*: Whether to do

Full_Name: Henrik Aalborg Nielsen Version: 2.10 OS: Linux (SLES 10 / openSUSE 11.1) Submission from: (NULL) (77.66.63.89) There seems to be a bug in df.residual.nls which is triggered when nls is called with argument na.action = na.exclude; in that case 'resid(object)' will contain NA-values which should be disregarded when counting the number of residuals: df.residual.nls <-

...PF?IPFW and IPSec and VIMAGE have had ignored the existance of Mandatory Access Control, they generate mbuf without a tag for Mandatory Access Control. Many of these has been corrected. b) The audit subsystem's handling of auditing disk full is wrong in locking vnodes 2) to test the correct enforement of various of access control (Mandatory Access Control, ACL, and priviledges in jail). Goal: To prevent the access right violation of the designer's intension 3) the consistency between the Mandatory Access Control Label generated by userland application and the label kernel actually handl...

Hi Chris, Thanks for this info. This provides even better and more advanced examples of multiclass usage! But your previous explanations were so good that I implemented in my backend last week almost the same that you've done now in the X86InstrSSE.td. I even introduced isCommutable parameter to indicate this property, just as you did. So, by now integer arithmetic and general purpose

> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > >>> such a call instruction? > >> > >> Why not just make the asm string be "call __fsub64"? > > > > Well, of course it would be the best solution. But the interesting > part > > is that I need to generate the machine code directly because for > > different reasons use of a system

For anyone interested, X86InstrSSE.td makes extensive use of multiclasses now if people are looking for examples other than the sparc backend. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

The Wine development release 1.1.20 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Show a dialog on application crashes. - Much improved OLE copy/paste support. - Various listview improvements. - More Direct3D code cleanups. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations: