search for: enfor

...proposal > correctly: > You mean I don't need to define any FP operations as machine > instructions at all. Instead, I basically tell that I will expand all > FP operations myself and then I simply expand them into the following > sequence of instructions: > mov arg1, %d0 // enfore register constraint > mov arg2, %d1 // enfore register constraint > call __fsub64 > > Is it correct understanding? If yes, how do I explain that arguments > are to be passed on the concrete physical registers like %d0 and %d1 > and result comes on %d0? Do I need to allocate v...

...side-effects, > they > > look pretty much like real instructions. Thus I have the idea to > > represent them in the tblgen instruction descriptions like > > pseudo-instructions, where constraints define which concrete > physical > > %dX registers are to use. This would enfore correct register > > allocation. > > > > For example: > > def FSUB64: I<0x11, (ops), "fsub64", [(set d0, (fsub d0, d1))]>, > > Imp<[d0,d1],[d0,d1]>; // Uses d0, d1 and defines d0,d1 > > > > This seems to work, at least on si...

...produce operands on registers without any further side-effects, they look pretty much like real instructions. Thus I have the idea to represent them in the tblgen instruction descriptions like pseudo-instructions, where constraints define which concrete physical %dX registers are to use. This would enfore correct register allocation. For example: def FSUB64: I<0x11, (ops), "fsub64", [(set d0, (fsub d0, d1))]>, Imp<[d0,d1],[d0,d1]>; // Uses d0, d1 and defines d0,d1 This seems to work, at least on simple test files. But I would also need a way to conv...

Hi, I was looking into the new Authentication Policy feature: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Policy I had kinda hoped that I would be able to enfore this in a proxy running in front of several backends. This proxy does not authenticate. It use "nopassword". But I realize that the "succes" reported in the final authpolicy req. (command=report) is not what is actaully happening on the IMAP protocol level, but rather the res...

...registers without any further side-effects, they > look pretty much like real instructions. Thus I have the idea to > represent them in the tblgen instruction descriptions like > pseudo-instructions, where constraints define which concrete physical > %dX registers are to use. This would enfore correct register > allocation. > > For example: > def FSUB64: I<0x11, (ops), "fsub64", [(set d0, (fsub d0, d1))]>, > Imp<[d0,d1],[d0,d1]>; // Uses d0, d1 and defines d0,d1 > > This seems to work, at least on simple test files. That should be a...

...est.output.bc However, my passes require other LLVM's passes before and after. For example, the ordering of passes that I want: (1) A couple of LLVM's passes ==> (2) my_loop_pass ==> (3) my_module_pass ==> (4) Other LLVM's standard O3 optimizations (a bunch of passes). Can I enfore such complex pass ordering easily? I'd like to pass just a single argument in opt, which trigers the whole pipeline of passes. I tried to use getAnalysisUsage and addRequired. But, the documentation is somewhat vague, I wasn't able even to enforce the pass in (1) to be executed before (2)...

...proposal > correctly: > You mean I don't need to define any FP operations as machine > instructions at all. Instead, I basically tell that I will expand all > FP operations myself and then I simply expand them into the following > sequence of instructions: > mov arg1, %d0 // enfore register constraint > mov arg2, %d1 // enfore register constraint > call __fsub64 > > Is it correct understanding? Yes, if you tell the legalizer you want to custom expand everything, you can do this. In practice, there may be ones the legalizer doesn't know how to custom exp...

...to be able to ensure that when a new contact is created this can only happen if a valid suberb is associated with it, and which mechanisms of the below are supposed to do this? (a) using DB foreign key constraints information as a basis? (b) using the "has_one" line in the model file to enfore? If neither of these are enforced what is the best way to enforce this integrity? -------------------------- class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :suberb end -------------------------- class Suberb < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :contacts end -------------------------- class C...

...ilures in the proxy is probably very high. regards, Peter Mogensen On 12/14/2017 08:30 AM, Peter Mogensen wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking into the new Authentication Policy feature: > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Policy > > I had kinda hoped that I would be able to enfore this in a proxy running > in front of several backends. This proxy does not authenticate. It use > "nopassword". > > > But I realize that the "succes" reported in the final authpolicy req. > (command=report) is not what is actaully happening on the IMAP protoc...

Full_Name: Henrik Aalborg Nielsen Version: 2.10 OS: Linux (SLES 10 / openSUSE 11.1) Submission from: (NULL) (77.66.63.89) There seems to be a bug in df.residual.nls which is triggered when nls is called with argument na.action = na.exclude; in that case 'resid(object)' will contain NA-values which should be disregarded when counting the number of residuals: df.residual.nls <-

...PF?IPFW and IPSec and VIMAGE have had ignored the existance of Mandatory Access Control, they generate mbuf without a tag for Mandatory Access Control. Many of these has been corrected. b) The audit subsystem's handling of auditing disk full is wrong in locking vnodes 2) to test the correct enforement of various of access control (Mandatory Access Control, ACL, and priviledges in jail). Goal: To prevent the access right violation of the designer's intension 3) the consistency between the Mandatory Access Control Label generated by userland application and the label kernel actually...

Hi Chris, Thanks for this info. This provides even better and more advanced examples of multiclass usage! But your previous explanations were so good that I implemented in my backend last week almost the same that you've done now in the X86InstrSSE.td. I even introduced isCommutable parameter to indicate this property, just as you did. So, by now integer arithmetic and general purpose

...You mean I don't need to define any FP operations as machine > > instructions at all. Instead, I basically tell that I will expand > all > > FP operations myself and then I simply expand them into the > following > > sequence of instructions: > > mov arg1, %d0 // enfore register constraint > > mov arg2, %d1 // enfore register constraint > > call __fsub64 > > > > Is it correct understanding? > > Yes, if you tell the legalizer you want to custom expand everything, > you > can do this. In practice, there may be ones the legal...

For anyone interested, X86InstrSSE.td makes extensive use of multiclasses now if people are looking for examples other than the sparc backend. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

...winedbg: Add a crash dialog for --auto mode. Nicolas Le Cam (7): msi/tests: Test MsiRecordGetString on null and empty strings. msi: Fix buffer length value returned by MSI_RecordGetStringW on null and empty strings. wininet/tests: Fix HttpSendRequestW test on IE5. msi: Enfore use of GetFileAttributes return value. msi/tests: Add empty dir test for the DrLocator part of the AppSearch action. msi: Fix ACTION_AppSearchDr on empty path. msi/tests: Fix package test when run on a different drive than C:\. Nikolay Sivov (19): comctl32/listview: Fix se...