search for: enetunreach

I am trying to run my first app on the Solaris server, in a production environment. I get a network unreachable. Why? Does it belongs to database.yml config? Processing CategoriesController#index (for 10.3.70.129 at 2010-01-05 14:00:47) [GET] Errno::ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable - connect(2)): /usr/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:560:in `initialize'' /usr/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:560:in `open'' /usr/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:560:in `connect'' /usr/ruby-enterprise/lib/ruby/1.8/ti...

...know, either. Wait for more comments ? I prefer the second option, because the device is in a transitional state and a connect can block (for at most two seconds) until the device is started. For the first option, I'm also not sure if ECONNREFUSED is the right error to return, maybe is better ENETUNREACH. Cheers, Stefano

...know, either. Wait for more comments ? I prefer the second option, because the device is in a transitional state and a connect can block (for at most two seconds) until the device is started. For the first option, I'm also not sure if ECONNREFUSED is the right error to return, maybe is better ENETUNREACH. Cheers, Stefano

Hi, I've got another one... NFS error 101 with NFSROOT has been discussed a lot, and hpa gave an answer to it which appears right. It's ENETUNREACH, and I suspect my diskless box does not set its IP parameters right. PXElinux is set up as follows: label linvdr kernel kernel-linvdr append initrd=initrd-linvdr acpi=off root=/dev/nfs \ nfsroot=192.168.20.1:/opt/tftpboot/linvdr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192 \ nfsaddrs=192.168.20.20:192.168.2...

...s ? > > I prefer the second option, because the device is in a transitional > state and a connect can block (for at most two seconds) until the device is > started. > > For the first option, I'm also not sure if ECONNREFUSED is the right error > to return, maybe is better ENETUNREACH. > > Cheers, > Stefano IIRC: ECONNREFUSED is what one gets when connecting to remote a port which does not yet have a listening socket, so remote sends back RST. ENETUNREACH is when local network's down, so you can't even send a connection request. EHOSTUNREACH is remote network...

...(12, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 <0.000015> 11:41:52 setsockopt(12, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000018> 11:41:52 connect(12, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(389), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:8b0:1627:1::2", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable) <0.000032> 11:41:52 close(12) = 0 <0.000028> 11:41:52 close(11) = 0 <0.000024> 11:41:52 close(10) = 0 <0.000020> 11:41:52 fcntl(8, F_SETLKW, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=288, len=1}) = 0 <0.000021> 11:41:52 fcntl(8, F_SETLKW, {type=F_U...

...LL, si_utime=0, si_stime=0} --- socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 5 setsockopt(5, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 *connect(5, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(389), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:1291:XXX:85Xa::66XX", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable)* ERROR(exception): uncaught exception - Failed to find a writeable DC for domain 'CENTRAL.DOMAIN.COM.BR' File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python...

...SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) --- socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 5 setsockopt(5, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 connect(5, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(389), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::2", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable) ERROR(exception): uncaught exception - Failed to find a writeable DC for domain 'linex.r00t.la' File "/opt/samba4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File "/opt/samba4/lib/p...

...ILL, si_utime=0, si_stime=0} --- socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 5 setsockopt(5, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 *connect(5, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(389), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2008:29Y:XXX:85Xa::66XX", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable)* ERROR(exception): uncaught exception - Failed to find a writeable DC for domain 'CENTRAL.DOMAIN.COM.BR <http://com.br/>' File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) Fil...

On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 22:21 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:58:33PM +0000, Jon Gerdes wrote: > > winbind has a concept of offline and online but I don't know what > > that > > is, nor how nss works with it. I've tried using smbcontrol to tell > > winbind it is offline or online but that does not seem to work. > > Restarting

...0x2 (flags O_RDWR) fcntl(12, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 setsockopt(12, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, [1], 4) = 0 setsockopt(12, SOL_IP, IP_TOS, [16], 4) = 0 fcntl(12, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 connect(12, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(655), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.1")}, 16) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable) sendto(3, "<27>Jul 2 01:39:52 tinc.jmuchem"..., 114, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 114 close(12) = 0 sendto(3, "<27>Jul 2 01:39:52 tinc.jmuchem"..., 84, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 84 sendto(3, "<29>Jul 2 01:39:5...

...EXEC) = 0 <0.000015> > 11:41:52 setsockopt(12, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000018> > 11:41:52 connect(12, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(389), > inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:8b0:1627:1::2", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, > sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable) > <0.000032> > 11:41:52 close(12) = 0 <0.000028> > 11:41:52 close(11) = 0 <0.000024> > 11:41:52 close(10) = 0 <0.000020> > 11:41:52 fcntl(8, F_SETLKW, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=288, > len=1}) = 0 <0.000021> > 11...

...000015> >> 11:41:52 setsockopt(12, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000018> >> 11:41:52 connect(12, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(389), >> inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:8b0:1627:1::2", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, >> sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable) >> <0.000032> >> 11:41:52 close(12) = 0 <0.000028> >> 11:41:52 close(11) = 0 <0.000024> >> 11:41:52 close(10) = 0 <0.000020> >> 11:41:52 fcntl(8, F_SETLKW, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=288, >> len=1}) = 0...

...> 11:41:52 setsockopt(12, SOL_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000018> > >> 11:41:52 connect(12, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(389), > >> inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2001:8b0:1627:1::2", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, > >> sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable) > >> <0.000032> > >> 11:41:52 close(12) = 0 <0.000028> > >> 11:41:52 close(11) = 0 <0.000024> > >> 11:41:52 close(10) = 0 <0.000020> > >> 11:41:52 fcntl(8, F_SETLKW, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=2...

...m/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:536: error: ‘ENETDOWN’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:537: error: ‘ENETRESET’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:538: error: ‘ENETUNREACH’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:539: error: ‘ENOBUFS’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/llvm3.0/llvm/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:540: error: ‘ECHILD’ was not declared in this scope /home/carl/Downloads/l...

Hi all, Gluster and Ganesha are amazing. Thank you for this great work! I?m struggling with one issue and I think that you might be able to help me. I spent some time by playing with Gluster and Ganesha and after I gain some experience I decided that I should go into production but I?m still struggling with one issue. I have 3x node CentOS 7.3 with the most current Gluster and Ganesha from

...sk->transport; + /* The hypervisor and well-known contexts do not have socket * endpoints. */ - if (!transport->stream_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid, + if (!transport || + !transport->stream_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid, remote_addr->svm_port)) { err = -ENETUNREACH; goto out; } - /* Set the remote address that we are connecting to. */ - memcpy(&vsk->remote_addr, remote_addr, - sizeof(vsk->remote_addr)); - err = vsock_auto_bind(vsk); if (err) goto out; @@ -1586,7 +1651,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *s...

...sk->transport; + /* The hypervisor and well-known contexts do not have socket * endpoints. */ - if (!transport->stream_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid, + if (!transport || + !transport->stream_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid, remote_addr->svm_port)) { err = -ENETUNREACH; goto out; } - /* Set the remote address that we are connecting to. */ - memcpy(&vsk->remote_addr, remote_addr, - sizeof(vsk->remote_addr)); - err = vsock_auto_bind(vsk); if (err) goto out; @@ -1572,7 +1630,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *s...

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using