search for: ende

Hi, executing the reload command on Asterisk make the Unicall channel unblock all Unicall channels dropping active calls. Is this just a local error (maybe in the other end of my E1 ?), an option in the source (maybe a debugging option ?) or it must be this way ? Asterisk: 1.0.9 unicall: 0.0.3-pre4 protocolvariant: br Thanks, Leonardo Aug 31 15:00:55 WARNING[28411]: Already have a

The floating-point expectations allow for an error tolerance. Is there any similar facility for dates? For example, say I have a custom class that handles date/time spans and I want to spec it: context "A DateRange span" do specify "should know when a week ago is :)" do d = DateRange.new d.last_week.should_be_close_to(1.week.ago, 24*60*60) end end The idea

I have a distributed/replicated setup with Glusterfs 3.0.2, that I'm testing on 4 servers, each with access to /mnt/gluster (which consists of all directories /mnt/data01 - data24) on each server. I'm using configs I built from volgen, but every time I access a file (via an 'ls -l') for the first time, I get all of these messages in my logs on each server: [2010-05-04 10:50:30] W

[ I am initially copying only a few lists since they seem like the most impacted projects and I didn't want to spam all the mailing lists. Please let me know if other lists should be included. ] I submitted D68230 for review but this is not about that patch per se. The patch allows update_cc_test_checks.py to process tests that should check target asm rather than LLVM IR. We use this

Hi, I was wondering I'm going about this in the correct way. I need to test if there are coding sequences or exons in hg19 which match a string of 100bp "D" i.e. [A,G or T]. However I'm getting a strange result. I get a hit on chr7, using the 100bp search however when I search with 60bp sequence of "D" I don't get any hits. library("BSgenome")

Here is a patch that gets the theora_static.dsp project for VC6 building again. Aaron -------------- next part -------------- Index: win32/theora_static.dsp =================================================================== --- win32/theora_static.dsp (revision 13945) +++ win32/theora_static.dsp (working copy) @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ # PROP Intermediate_Dir "Static_Release" # PROP

I have a loop that processes all the raw data files in agiven directory. It should allocate only the memory to accomodate the filenames list. Each file is loaded into RAM one at a time and saved to another directory after processing. The R script runs fine but it had some memory problems so it was terminated before getting to the end of the list. This is a Windows XP desktop with ~ 1GB RAM In the

...ardwarePool.get_default_pool - set_perms(@default_pool) - super('You do not have permission to access networks') - end - - def pre_list - @networks = Network.find(:all) - authorize_admin - end - - def list - respond_to do |format| - format.html { - render :layout => 'tabs-and-content' if params[:ajax] - render :layout => 'help-and-content' if params[:nolayout] - } - format.xml { - render :xml => @pool.to_xml(XML_OPTS) - } - end - end - - def networks_json - json_list(Network.fi...

Is it possible to access the described class in a shared behavior? I''m trying to do something like this: describe "Siberian feline", :shared => true do described_class_instance_as :feline, :name => "fluffy", :breed => "Siberian" # or maybe before(:all) do @feline = described_class.new(:name => "fluffy", :breed =>

I''m a rails newb and have been Googling about this, but I''m still stumped. Not showing everything here, but basically it should be a pretty common setup so I''m sure others know what I''m doing wrong. - A meter can belong to many meter_groups - A meter_group can have many meters. - A user can ''subscribe'' to viewing a meter_group (Subscription)

Hello, While reading Dan North''s BDD tutorial <http://dannorth.net/introducing-bdd>, I tried to implement his ATM example as spec stubs. When I first implemented it creating a context for each of his scenarios, I noticed that there is duplication and a combinatorial explosion of the specs. I attached the full files to this email. For brevity, I will use scenario 1 in the body of

This is not a big deal, but DelegateClass fails with rspec when methods are defined in the the delegating class. Here''s code that demonstrates: require ''delegate'' gem ''rspec'' # Version 1.0.5 ############################################################ # CONTROL EXAMPLE: Works FINE. ############################################################ class

I''ve been going through Pat''s example story and noticed that there was no checking for a bad login. I assume this is because that would have made the article bigger and more complicated than it needed to be. So the question that comes of of this is: How do folks normally handle the negative case? My plan was to just use another scenario, but as a new person to BDD/TDD,

Hello all, I''ve come up w/ a worker class that manages queued jobs using a fixed number of child workers. Well, that''s not quite true -- a new worker is spawned for each job, but you set the total number that may exist at once. There are three components: 1) queue_worker.rb: The singleton worker that manages the child workers. You probably want to auto start this. Make sure you

What are people''s opinions on which of these two styles is better to use? 1) before --------------------------- module UserSpecHelper include GenericSpecHelper def valid_sms_attributes(phone_number="12345") { :phone_number => phone_number } end end describe User, "with phone number" do include UserSpecHelper before(:each) do @user =

...have 8 servers.? 7 of the 8 say that gbe02 is in state State: Peer Rejected (Connected). gbe08 says it is connected to the other?7? but they are all State: Peer Rejected (Connected) So it would appear that gbe02 is out of sync with the group. I triggered a manual self heal by doing a the recommended ./find on a gluster mount. I'm stuck... I cannot find ANY docs on this except one saying: "hi Freddie, ????A Peer is Rejected during "peer probe" if the two peers have conflicting volumes, i.e. volumes with same name but different contents. Is this what happened to you?....

...CodeGen Context =============== The back-end's objects are currently generated once with a set of options handed to it by the front-end. These options are not expected to change throughout the lifetime of the back-end. With the advent of extended function attributes, this is no longer a correct assumption. During LTO for instance, a function's attributes may change how the back-end should generate code for that function. For example, in this code `@foo' won't disable frame pointer generation, but `@bar' will disable it: d...

...:stuff before_filter :login_required, :only => [:create, :edit, :new] def create @stuff= Stuff.new(params[:todo]) @stuff.user = @session[:user] if @stuff.save flash[:notice] = ''Event was successfully created.'' redirect_to :action => ''list'' else render :action => ''new'' end end ... def edit @stuff= Stuff.find(params[:id]) if @stuff.user != @session[:user] flash[:notice] = ''You cannot edit an article you didn\''t upload.'' redirect_to :action => ''show'', :id => @...

Hi, i''m going to implement a syndication-service, which will get lists in xml with some meta-data an enclosed video files, which will get encoded at the end. The syndication run will be startet every five minutes of a full hour. So i thought to build 4 Worker. One for checking which feeds to syndicate (syndication_worker) at a specific time, one for processing the list

I''ve found these two snippets of code useful and would love some feedback. first, .should_have_valid_associations usage: context "A new Product" do specify "should have valid associations" do @product.should_have_valid_associations end end code: (thanks to Wilson/Defiler for converting to rspec) module Spec module Expectations module Should