search for: endcatchbb

...ould end a cleanup block, and would target the next action. I like this because I talk a lot about "unwind edges" in the CFG, and a cleanup finishing feels like an unwind edge. I could also see 'dispatch' here. Some possible new syntax: recover from label %maycatch.int to label %endcatchbb unwind from label %cleanup.obj to label %nextaction unwind from label %cleanup.obj ; unwinds out of the function, hook it up to the unwind edge of an inlined call site For Itanium, tail merging is profitable and doable with phis, so we might want to do this instead: recover to label %endcatchb...

...ext action. I like this because I talk a lot about "unwind edges" in the > CFG, and a cleanup finishing feels like an unwind edge. I could also see > 'dispatch' here. > > > > Some possible new syntax: > > > > recover from label %maycatch.int to label %endcatchbb > > unwind from label %cleanup.obj to label %nextaction > > unwind from label %cleanup.obj ; unwinds out of the function, hook it > up to the unwind edge of an inlined call site > > > > For Itanium, tail merging is profitable and doable with phis, so we might > want...

...ext action. I like this because I talk a lot about "unwind edges" in the > CFG, and a cleanup finishing feels like an unwind edge. I could also see > 'dispatch' here. > > > > Some possible new syntax: > > > > recover from label %maycatch.int to label %endcatchbb > > unwind from label %cleanup.obj to label %nextaction > > unwind from label %cleanup.obj ; unwinds out of the function, hook it > up to the unwind edge of an inlined call site > > > > For Itanium, tail merging is profitable and doable with phis, so we might > want...

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Joseph Tremoulet <jotrem at microsoft.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Thanks for sending this out. We're looking forward to seeing this come > about, since we need funclet separation for LLILC as well (and I have > cycles to spend on it, if that would be helpful). > > > > Some questions about the new proposal: > > >