Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "encrypted_state_init_ghcb".
Did you mean:
encrypted_state_init_ghcbs
2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...e7be9bb49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
+void __init encrypted_state_init_ghcbs(void);
bool sme_active(void);
bool sev_active(void);
bool sev_es_active(void);
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp) { }
static inline void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { }
+stat...
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
> void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
> void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
>
> +void __init encrypted_state_init_ghcbs(void);
> bool sme_active(void);
> bool sev_active(void);
> bool sev_es_active(void);
> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static inline void __init sme_early_init(void) { }
> static inline void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp) { }
> static inline void __init sme_enable(struc...
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.