search for: enclined

...not registered*" for any command related to the graphics package. I made a ticket on stackoverflow about it: https://stackoverflow.com/ questions/51242993/difference-between-r-3-4-4-and-r-3-5-1-in-r-api-for-c But nobody could explain why so far. And after reducing my code further, I am now enclined to think this is actually a bug. The code provided in stackOverflow is already reduced, but not minimal yet. Since then, I reduced it further to really ensure that it was not an interference from anything around it. So I removed the GUI and the callbacks. Here is a really minimal example attached....

Hi ogg.k, I've just been asked what the difference was between Kate and the W3C timed text format (http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/) and whether there was any compatibility. It migjht be a question and answer to add to the OggKate wiki page. Cheers, Silvia.

...ufficient knowledge of the way R is programmed to fix > the problem by myself. What's your opinion about that ? Should RMySQL be > updated ? Are you working on that ? In the previous debate you seemed to > believe the problem lies in R (>= 1.8.0), and not in RMySQL. I'm > enclined to think you may be right, since I had a few difficulties with > R >= 1.8.0 (new library to be added for X11, eg). > > If you think this can be useful to others you can cc your answer to R-devel. > > Thanks in advance for any help, > Best regards, > Laurent

...- my /usr/lib/libkrb.a stems from the 4.2-RELEASE cd install I started this comp with (it's dated Nov 2000) and thus hasn't been updated since and any linkage with it, results in undefined des(3) references. Since sysutils/libchk doesn't report the libs as unreferenced, I'm not enclined to throw it out just yet, so a knob would be welcome. -- Melvyn

...ommand related to the > graphics package. > > I made a ticket on stackoverflow about it: https://stackoverflow.com/ > questions/51242993/difference-between-r-3-4-4-and-r-3-5-1-in-r-api-for-c > > But nobody could explain why so far. And after reducing my code further, I > am now enclined to think this is actually a bug. > > The code provided in stackOverflow is already reduced, but not minimal yet. > Since then, I reduced it further to really ensure that it was not an > interference from anything around it. So I removed the GUI and the > callbacks. > Here is a rea...