search for: enchufa2

Hi all, Not sure if this belongs to R-devel or R-package-devel. Anyways... Suppose we have objects of class c("foo", "bar"), and there are two S3 methods c.foo, c.bar. In c.foo, I'm trying to modify the dots and forward the dispatch using NextMethod without any success. This is what I've tried so far: c.foo <- function(..., recursive=FALSE) { dots <-

...; http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_06_04 >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > -- > I?aki ?car > http://www.enchufa2.es > @Enchufa2 > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

I've set up a repo with a reproducible example of the issue described in my last email: https://github.com/Enchufa2/dispatchS3dots I?aki 2018-02-20 19:33 GMT+01:00 I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > Not sure if this belongs to R-devel or R-package-devel. Anyways... > > Suppose we have objects of class c("foo", "bar"), and there are two S3 > methods c.f...

Dear all, During a recent package submission, we were highlighted that some lines in our configure script didn't follow the correct syntax. The lines looked like this: x=$(($y/10)) We were indicated at the time that this is because the statement does not use Bourne shell syntax, which is absolutely true, and also that the manual warns about this, which is true again. So far everything

...or uncovering this problem. I don't think there is a way to replace (unnamed) arguments in dots for NextMethod. Tomas On 02/21/2018 02:16 PM, I?aki ?car wrote: > I've set up a repo with a reproducible example of the issue described > in my last email: > > https://github.com/Enchufa2/dispatchS3dots > > I?aki > > 2018-02-20 19:33 GMT+01:00 I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com>: >> Hi all, >> >> Not sure if this belongs to R-devel or R-package-devel. Anyways... >> >> Suppose we have objects of class c("foo", "bar"),...

...se Fedora as the base image instead, because you'll enjoy binary installations for most of CRAN via Copr [1]. You even have a docker image ready to go [2]. (Disclaimer: I'm the maintainer of that project). [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/iucar/cran/ [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/enchufa2/cran2copr/dockerfile -- I?aki ?car

...ties/V3_chap02.html > [4] > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_06_04 > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- I?aki ?car http://www.enchufa2.es @Enchufa2

...'t think there is a way to replace (unnamed) arguments in dots for >> NextMethod. > That's a pity. IMHO, it should be some mechanism for that, but dots > are special in inscrutable ways. > > Anyway, for anyone insterested, I found a workaround: > > https://github.com/Enchufa2/dispatchS3dots#workaround Even though technically this won't be too hard, I don't think NextMethod should be made any more complex than it is now. There should always be a way to implement special dispatch scenarios in R and your workaround shows it is possible specifically in your scena...

...319-335-3386 > Department of Statistics and Fax: 319-335-3017 > Actuarial Science > 241 Schaeffer Hall email: luke-tierney at uiowa.edu > Iowa City, IA 52242 WWW: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu -- I?aki ?car http://www.enchufa2.es @Enchufa2

...ments, but can't do this simple > task. That's an example of really bad UI design. > > Duncan Murdoch > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- I?aki ?car http://www.enchufa2.es @Enchufa2

...> utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_06_04 > >> > >> ______________________________________________ > >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > > > > -- > > I?aki ?car > > http://www.enchufa2.es > > @Enchufa2 > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https...

...to deal with this matter. > > > Just disable code chunk evaluation if suggested packages are missing (see > [1]). As explained by Prof. Ripley, it will only affect Fedora checks on > r-devel, i.e., your users will still see fully evaluated vignettes on CRAN. > > [1] https://www.enchufa2.es/archives/suggests-and-vignettes.html > > I?aki > > > Thanks in advance for your kind assistance, > Ulrich Bodenhofer > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: CRAN packages not using Suggests conditionally > Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 08:...

...ent of Statistics and Fax: 319-335-3017 >> Actuarial Science >> 241 Schaeffer Hall email: luke-tierney at uiowa.edu >> Iowa City, IA 52242 WWW: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu > > > -- > I?aki ?car > http://www.enchufa2.es > @Enchufa2

...Just disable code chunk evaluation if suggested packages are >> ??? missing (see [1]). As explained by Prof. Ripley, it will only >> ??? affect Fedora checks on r-devel, i.e., your users will still see >> ??? fully evaluated vignettes on CRAN. >> >> ??? [1] https://www.enchufa2.es/archives/suggests-and-vignettes.html >> ??? <https://www.enchufa2.es/archives/suggests-and-vignettes.html> >> >> ??? I?aki >> >> >> ??????? Thanks in advance for your kind assistance, >> ??????? Ulrich Bodenhofer >> >> >> >>...

...06_04 >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> >> >> >>> -- >>> I?aki ?car >>> http://www.enchufa2.es >>> @Enchufa2 >> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-proje...

...> > > Just disable code chunk evaluation if suggested packages are > missing (see [1]). As explained by Prof. Ripley, it will only > affect Fedora checks on r-devel, i.e., your users will still see > fully evaluated vignettes on CRAN. > > [1] https://www.enchufa2.es/archives/suggests-and-vignettes.html > <https://www.enchufa2.es/archives/suggests-and-vignettes.html> > > I?aki > > > Thanks in advance for your kind assistance, > Ulrich Bodenhofer > > > > -------- Forwarded Message --------...

On 9 August 2018 at 20:37, Tomas Kalibera wrote: | So to answer your original question, this could probably be handled in | Rcpp, Hm. Why do you say that / what did you have in mind? Recall that we do not alter SEXPs or introduce additional additional reference counters -- because we do not think that altering the basic R API for such calls would be a wise strategy. So we do more or less what

Hi all, Is there a better to way to subset the ROWs (in the sense of NROW) of an vector, matrix, data frame or array than this? subset_ROW <- function(x, i) { nd <- length(dim(x)) if (nd <= 1L) { x[i] } else { dims <- rep(list(quote(expr = )), nd - 1L) do.call(`[`, c(list(quote(x), quote(i)), dims, list(drop = FALSE))) } } subset_ROW(1:10, 4:6) #> [1] 4 5 6

Hi all, We are excited to announce that this new feature is coming to Fedora 33, which is in beta state. See [1] or [2] for more information on how to test it. [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/fedora/ [2] https://www.enchufa2.es/archives/switch-blas-lapack-without-leaving-your-r-session.html Regards, -- I?aki ?car

...e (unnamed) arguments in dots for >>> NextMethod. >> >> That's a pity. IMHO, it should be some mechanism for that, but dots >> are special in inscrutable ways. >> >> Anyway, for anyone insterested, I found a workaround: >> >> https://github.com/Enchufa2/dispatchS3dots#workaround > > Even though technically this won't be too hard, I don't think NextMethod > should be made any more complex than it is now. There should always be a way > to implement special dispatch scenarios in R and your workaround shows it is > possible spec...