Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "enbable".
Did you mean:
enable
2007 Jun 21
0
Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain
...k box.
>> Which means
>> that if I upgrade to the next version of the library I'd have to reapply
>> the patches.
>
>For those of us working on very memory constrained platforms, I don't think
>that it will ever be a black box, because that would require having ENBABLE
>defines for every rate and feature, so one could build up just what is
>needed. That would be really messy.
>
I'd guess Jean-Marc would never agree to ENABLE defines because it would complicate the life
for non-memory-constrained majority. But we could convince him to add DISABLE...
2007 Jun 19
1
Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 6:38 PM
To: Michael Shatz
Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++
toolchain
>> Yes, data footprint in the new version is quite manageable. Still I would
>> wish better documentation for speex_alloc_scratch().
>