search for: enablesegmentedstacks

...at variable sized alloca's are handled by using the heap. This is an interesting idea, but you have to be careful to avoid leaks if exceptions are enabled. *) If I remember correctly, you wanted to fold the red zone in the "do I need more stack" check, but I seed that you have a !EnableSegmentedStacks in the Red Zone check. Have you decided not to do it? *) You intend for the runtime to be compatible with the gcc one? Their stack allocating function is called __morestack... > [1] https://github.com/sanjoy/llvm/tree/segmented-stacks > Cheers, Rafael

Hi! I've attached my first week of work as a patchset for review. This is also available on Github [1]. By next Monday I intend to (more or less) finish up the preliminary parts concerning the codegen; and start working on the runtime (so that I can do a basic sanity check). [1] https://github.com/sanjoy/llvm/tree/segmented-stacks -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com

On 08/10/2011 11:03 AM, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Hi! > > Attached my pre-midterm GSoC work for segmented stacks for review (with > the required fixes). Nice work! + extern bool EnableSegmentedStacks; Can you add a comment like the other declarations? I think the patch looks good. There are possible improvements, but the patch is already in an state where it can be tested and extended by others, so IMHO it is probably good to commit. Duncan, Chris, what do you think? Some possible work it...

Hi! Attached my pre-midterm GSoC work for segmented stacks for review (with the required fixes). Thanks! -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-New-command-line-option-to-enable-segmented-stacks.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1699 bytes Desc: not available URL:

...re handled by using the > heap. This is an interesting idea, but you have to be careful to avoid > leaks if exceptions are enabled. > > *) If I remember correctly, you wanted to fold the red zone in the > "do I > need more stack" check, but I seed that you have a > !EnableSegmentedStacks in the Red Zone check. Have you decided not > to do it? > > *) You intend for the runtime to be compatible with the gcc one? Their > stack allocating function is called __morestack... > >> [1] https://github.com/sanjoy/llvm/tree/segmented-stacks >> > > Cheers, &gt...