search for: enable_

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "enable_".

Did you mean: enables
2008 May 22
1
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches
...ta by default. I've modified the TEST.nightly.report script to add two columns (OPT-BETA and LLC/OPT-BETA), but committing this change would mean that most users will be having a lot of useless columns (though they already have that for the LLC-BETA stuff). Is there a way to access the ENABLE_* variables from the makefile in the report script? If so, you could only show the columns that will contain actual output, which will make the report a lot easier to read as well. 2. The opt-beta output is always processed by llc, so you can only compare llc results with and without a chan...
2008 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches
...is great for measuring the impact of codegen changes. opt-beta allows you to compare "opt -std-compile-opts" vs. "opt <your sequence of optimization passes>" For your use, you can have local command line option to trigger your simplifycfg patch and then you can try ENABLE_OPTBETA=1 OPTBETAOPTIONS="-your-command-line-flag -std-compile- opts" Let me know, if you try this and run into issues. - Devang
2007 Feb 20
5
Recipe for Apache2 on Debian (Etch)
...Simple Text Recipes. There is no ensure attribute. Since you already have done all the hard work, here a simple implementation: {{{ define apache_site($ensure = ''present'', $require => ''apache2'') { case $ensure { ''present'' : { apache_enable_site { "enable_$name": require => $require } } ''absent'' : { apache_disable_site { "disable_$name": } } default: { err( "Unknown ensure value ''$ensure''" ) } } } # Examples: apache_site { ["www.example.com",...
2008 May 21
4
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Mike Stump wrote: > On May 21, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: >> Any thoughts or suggestions on how to do this testing in a >> structured manner? > > I think that if what you're doing is sound, and you get the results > you want, say, on compiling something like gcc with it and others > review the basic idea (hi evan or chris) and
2005 Apr 26
3
Bug#306388: add ignore line for udhcpd
Package: logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Hi, the following two lines should be added either to ignore.d.server/dhcp or ignore.d.server/udhcp to ignore messages from udhcpd (other lines may be necessary) # udhcpd support ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udhcpd\[[0-9]+\]: sending OFFER of [.0-9]+ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udhcpd\[[0-9]+\]: sending ACK to [.0-9]+ filippo