Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "enable_".
Did you mean:
enables
2008 May 22
1
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches
...ta by default. I've modified the TEST.nightly.report script to add
two columns (OPT-BETA and LLC/OPT-BETA), but committing this change would
mean that most users will be having a lot of useless columns (though they
already have that for the LLC-BETA stuff).
Is there a way to access the ENABLE_* variables from the makefile in the
report script? If so, you could only show the columns that will contain
actual output, which will make the report a lot easier to read as well.
2. The opt-beta output is always processed by llc, so you can only compare
llc results with and without a chan...
2008 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches
...is great for measuring the impact of codegen changes.
opt-beta allows you to compare "opt -std-compile-opts" vs. "opt <your
sequence of optimization passes>"
For your use, you can have local command line option to trigger your
simplifycfg patch and then you can try
ENABLE_OPTBETA=1 OPTBETAOPTIONS="-your-command-line-flag -std-compile-
opts"
Let me know, if you try this and run into issues.
-
Devang
2007 Feb 20
5
Recipe for Apache2 on Debian (Etch)
...Simple Text Recipes. There is no ensure attribute. Since you
already have done all the hard work, here a simple implementation:
{{{
define apache_site($ensure = ''present'', $require => ''apache2'') {
case $ensure {
''present'' : {
apache_enable_site { "enable_$name": require => $require }
}
''absent'' : {
apache_disable_site { "disable_$name": }
}
default: { err( "Unknown ensure value ''$ensure''" ) }
}
}
# Examples:
apache_site {
["www.example.com",...
2008 May 21
4
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 21, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
>> Any thoughts or suggestions on how to do this testing in a
>> structured manner?
>
> I think that if what you're doing is sound, and you get the results
> you want, say, on compiling something like gcc with it and others
> review the basic idea (hi evan or chris) and
2005 Apr 26
3
Bug#306388: add ignore line for udhcpd
Package: logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
the following two lines should be added either to ignore.d.server/dhcp or
ignore.d.server/udhcp to ignore messages from udhcpd (other lines may be
necessary)
# udhcpd support
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udhcpd\[[0-9]+\]: sending OFFER of [.0-9]+
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udhcpd\[[0-9]+\]: sending ACK to [.0-9]+
filippo